3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient selection for spinal cord stimulation: The importance of an integrated assessment of clinical and psychosocial factors

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Psychological functioning of people living with chronic pain: a meta-analytic review.

          Chronic pain (CP; >3 months) is a common condition that is associated with significant psychological problems. Many people with CP do not fit into discrete diagnostic categories, limiting the applicability of research that is specific to a particular pain diagnosis. This meta-analysis synthesized the large extant literature from a general CP, rather than diagnosis-specific, perspective to systematically identify and compare the psychological problems most commonly associated with CP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prognostic factors of spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain.

            Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for more than 20 years in the treatment of diverse pain conditions. Although recent studies have identified more clearly those conditions for which SCSoffers a favorable prognosis, the identification of a patient population in whom reasonably long-term success can be expected has been difficult. In an effort to improve patient selection and increase the overall success rate of treatment, we have examined various physical, demographic, and psychosocial variables as predictors of SCS outcome. The study population consisted of 40 patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain, 85% of whom were diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome. Medical history and demographic data were collected as part of an initial assessment along with patient responses to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the visual analogue pain rating scale (VAS), the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Sickness Impact Profile. Treatment outcomes were examined and found to improve significantly after 3 months of stimulation. Subsequent regression analysis revealed that patient age, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory depression subscale D, and the evaluative subscale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQe) were important predictors of posttreatment pain status. Increased patient age and D subscale scores correlated negatively with pain status, as measured by the percentage of changes in pretreatment and posttreatment VAS scores, % delta VAS. In contrast, higher MPQe correlated with improved pain status. By the use of the following equation and the definition commonly associated with SCS success (at least 50% decrease in the VAS pain level), the success or failure of 3 months of SCS was correctly predicted in 88% of the study population. Our results suggest that patient age, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory depression, and MPQe may be clinically useful in the prediction of pain status after 3 months of SCS in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain. % delta VAS = 112.57 - 1.98 (D)-1.68 (Age) + 35.54 (MPQe).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.

              The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) has determined that there is a need for guidance regarding safety and risk reduction for implantable neurostimulation devices. The INS convened an international committee of experts in the field to explore the evidence and clinical experience regarding safety, risks, and steps to risk reduction to improve outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                European Journal of Pain
                European Journal of Pain
                Wiley
                1090-3801
                1532-2149
                October 2022
                August 02 2022
                October 2022
                : 26
                : 9
                : 1873-1881
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mid and South Essex University Hospitals Basildon UK
                [2 ]Centre for Decision Analysis and Support Ismar Healthcare Lier Belgium
                [3 ]Clinical Neuropsychology Service Oxford University Hospitals Oxford UK
                [4 ]Anaesthesiology & Pain Therapy Unit Santa Chiara University Hospital Pisa Italy
                [5 ]Leeds Pain and Neuromodulation Centre Leeds Teaching Hospitals Leeds UK
                [6 ]Department of Neurosurgery Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild Paris France
                [7 ]Department of Anaesthesiology AZ Delta Roeselare Belgium
                [8 ]Department of Pain Medicine The James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK
                [9 ]FederDolore‐SICD, Anaesthesiology & Pain Therapy Unit Santa Chiara University Hospital Pisa Italy
                [10 ]Pain Unit ICS Maugeri Pavia Italy
                [11 ]Department of Neurosurgery Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
                [12 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management Rijnstate Hospital Velp The Netherlands
                [13 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Treatment Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [14 ]Department of Neurosurgery Friederikenstift Hannover Hannover Germany
                [15 ]Department of Anaesthesiology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
                Article
                10.1002/ejp.2009
                66c153c0-eb19-4c2b-bad4-05743051fe4e
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article