2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Controversies in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Using Distraction Osteogenesis - A Systematic Review

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The three commonly employed sequences of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis with dentofacial deformities include post-arthroplastic distraction osteogenesis (PAD), simultaneous arthroplastic distraction osteogenesis (SAD), and pre-arthroplastic distraction osteogenesis (PrAD).

          Objective:

          The aim of this systematic review is to compare the effectiveness of various sequences of DO in the management of TMJ ankylosis with micrognathia/and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

          Data Sources:

          A comprehensive online and manual search of English language literature with no date restrictions was done on March 2020.

          Eligibility Criteria:

          Inclusion criteria were case series and prospective and retrospective studies involving adult/paediatric human subjects with unilateral/bilateral TMJ ankylosis and micrognathia/OSAS treated with DO.

          Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods:

          Of 73 studies identified, only 10 were included in the qualitative synthesis. The outcomes assessed were as follows: maximum mouth opening (MMO), posterior airway space (PAS), polysomnography variables, reankylosis, mandibular length, and chin and mandible position.

          Results:

          All the included studies showed high risk of bias. MMO and mandibular length increased, chin and mandibular position improved by the end of treatment in all the three sequences, and polysomnography variables and PAS significantly improved in PrAD compared to PAD and improved in SAD compared to baseline. Reankylosis was significantly less in PrAD.

          Conclusion:

          More well-designed studies comparing the three sequences of DO should be carried out to arrive at a consensus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Syndromic Craniosynostosis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children: is it necessary to perform mandibular distraction simultaneously?

              Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis in children disturbs not only mandibular growth, but also facial skeletal development. Costochondral graft was used to ensure growth, but it had proven to be unpredictable. The authors evaluate retrospectively 41 patients who underwent temporomandibular joint reconstruction during the last 10 years. Twenty were treated by costochondral graft, 15 by arthroplasty, and 6 by other surgical procedures, and they were excluded. The etiology was septic in 54% of the cases. Follow-up was at least 12 months in all cases. Arthroplasty was a quicker and easier procedure than the costochondral graft, reducing operating time, risk of blood transfusion, and hospital stays and costs. It also was associated with less risk of reankylosis, 13%vs 25%. Furthermore, it was associated with a minor morbidity and secondary complications. Seventy-five percent of the patients treated with bone graft required additional secondary surgery. Radiographically, the authors observed a remodeled neocondyle at the level of proximal mandibular end in cases treated by arthroplasty. On clinical examination, patients showed variable degrees of facial deformity and an unknown potential of mandibular growth after TMJ arthroplasty. The authors also observed improved clinical and radiologic appearance after ankylosis correction. Is it reasonable to perform ankylosis release and mandibular distraction simultaneously without knowing which patients will be able to experience growth with time? In that case it would be necessary a predict growth to apply the exact amount of mandibular distraction for obtaining stable results. Timing of mandibular distraction, after TMJ arthroplasty is performed and mandibular function restored, must be specific to each patient's needs, assuring the best distraction conditions and planning. The authors present their treatment protocol, including TMJ joint arthroplasty with temporal muscle interposition, and mandibular distraction osteogenesis, as a second procedure, to correct residual asymmetry or retrognathism if necessary.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Maxillofac Surg
                Ann Maxillofac Surg
                AMS
                Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                2231-0746
                2249-3816
                Jul-Dec 2021
                01 February 2022
                : 11
                : 2
                : 298-305
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Dyna Albert, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: dyn.albrt@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                AMS-11-298
                10.4103/ams.ams_208_20
                8848700
                35265502
                6636e81e-5de5-48cc-b1a4-dc4b810cdcdb
                Copyright: © 2022 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 18 September 2020
                : 11 October 2021
                : 25 October 2021
                Categories
                Systematic Review

                ankylosis,arthroplasty,congenital abnormalities,distraction osteogenesis,temporomandibular joint

                Comments

                Comment on this article