3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Retrospective bullying trajectories in adults with self‐reported oral language difficulties

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Previous research has consistently evidenced that children with speech and language difficulties suffer more bullying victimisation during middle school years, whereas other educative stages remain less explored. Moreover, there are divergent results in previous evidence about the types of victimisation (physical, verbal, relational) youths may experience.

          Aims

          To examine the retrospective developmental trajectories of bullying victimisation in adults with and without self‐reported oral language difficulties across seven educational stages (preschool to university). Special attention was given to the prevalence and types of victimisation.

          Methods & Procedures

          A total of 336 participants (ages between 18 and 65, M = 30.3) from a sample of 2259 participants that fully answered an online survey were classified as having experienced oral language difficulties (LD) not associated with a biomedical condition. A comparable control group ( n = 336; ages between 18 and 72, M = 30.0) was randomly selected for statistical between‐groups contrasts. Responses to the California Bullying Victimization Scale–Retrospective (CBVS‐R) were analysed by generalised estimating equations (GEE) including language groups, types of bullying, and educational stages as explanatory variables. Specific language group comparisons in terms of percentages were conducted using chi‐square tests.

          Outcomes & Results

          GEE results suggested that experiencing LD was associated with an overall increase in the likelihood of bullying victimisation, Wald's χ 2 (1) = 8.41, p < 0.005 for the main effect of the LD group, along almost all educational stages, Wald's χ 2 (6) = 3.13, p = 0.69 for the LD group × educational stage interaction. Finally, a higher proportion of participants in the LD group reported having suffered teasing behaviours at the second cycle of elementary, the first cycle of secondary, and baccalaureate. They also reported with a higher proportion being physically hurt at preschool and having received sexual comments at the second cycle of elementary, Wald's χ 2 (93) = 259.87, p < 0.001 for the LD group × educational stage × type of bullying interaction.

          Conclusions & Implications

          People with oral language difficulties experience more bullying victimisation behaviours than their typically developing peers. Heightened bullying prevalence in children with language difficulties seems to emerge as early as 6–9 years old and persists along the rest of schooling. Not all victimisation forms seem to show differential increased rates in people with speech/language difficulties, evidencing important implications for bullying assessment. Results highlight the need to provide particular support to individuals with language difficulties against bullying during the entire schooling.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology

          Background Lack of agreement about criteria and terminology for children's language problems affects access to services as well as hindering research and practice. We report the second phase of a study using an online Delphi method to address these issues. In the first phase, we focused on criteria for language disorder. Here we consider terminology. Methods The Delphi method is an iterative process in which an initial set of statements is rated by a panel of experts, who then have the opportunity to view anonymised ratings from other panel members. On this basis they can either revise their views or make a case for their position. The statements are then revised based on panel feedback, and again rated by and commented on by the panel. In this study, feedback from a second round was used to prepare a final set of statements in narrative form. The panel included 57 individuals representing a range of professions and nationalities. Results We achieved at least 78% agreement for 19 of 21 statements within two rounds of ratings. These were collapsed into 12 statements for the final consensus reported here. The term ‘Language Disorder’ is recommended to refer to a profile of difficulties that causes functional impairment in everyday life and is associated with poor prognosis. The term, ‘Developmental Language Disorder’ (DLD) was endorsed for use when the language disorder was not associated with a known biomedical aetiology. It was also agreed that (a) presence of risk factors (neurobiological or environmental) does not preclude a diagnosis of DLD, (b) DLD can co‐occur with other neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. ADHD) and (c) DLD does not require a mismatch between verbal and nonverbal ability. Conclusions This Delphi exercise highlights reasons for disagreements about terminology for language disorders and proposes standard definitions and nomenclature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: review of the evidence

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study

              Background Diagnosis of ‘specific’ language impairment traditionally required nonverbal IQ to be within normal limits, often resulting in restricted access to clinical services for children with lower NVIQ. Changes to DSM‐5 criteria for language disorder removed this NVIQ requirement. This study sought to delineate the impact of varying NVIQ criteria on prevalence, clinical presentation and functional impact of language disorder in the first UK population study of language impairment at school entry. Methods A population‐based survey design with sample weighting procedures was used to estimate population prevalence. We surveyed state‐maintained reception classrooms (n = 161 or 61% of eligible schools) in Surrey, England. From a total population of 12,398 children (ages 4–5 years), 7,267 (59%) were screened. A stratified subsample (n = 529) received comprehensive assessment of language, NVIQ, social, emotional and behavioural problems, and academic attainment. Results The total population prevalence estimate of language disorder was 9.92% (95% CI 7.38, 13.20). The prevalence of language disorder of unknown origin was estimated to be 7.58% (95% CI 5.33, 10.66), while the prevalence of language impairment associated with intellectual disability and/or existing medical diagnosis was 2.34% (95% CI 1.40, 3.91). Children with language disorder displayed elevated symptoms of social, emotional and behavioural problems relative to peers, F(1, 466) = 7.88, p = .05, and 88% did not make expected academic progress. There were no differences between those with average and low‐average NVIQ scores in severity of language deficit, social, emotional and behavioural problems, or educational attainment. In contrast, children with language impairments associated with known medical diagnosis and/or intellectual disability displayed more severe deficits on multiple measures. Conclusions At school entry, approximately two children in every class of 30 pupils will experience language disorder severe enough to hinder academic progress. Access to specialist clinical services should not depend on NVIQ.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                angels.esteller@uib.es
                Journal
                Int J Lang Commun Disord
                Int J Lang Commun Disord
                10.1111/(ISSN)1460-6984
                JLCD
                International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1368-2822
                1460-6984
                23 February 2022
                May-Jun 2022
                : 57
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/jlcd.v57.3 )
                : 578-592
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Investigació en Desenvolupament, Educació i Llenguatge (I+DEL), Institut de Recerca i Innovació Educativa (IRIE) Universitat de les Illes Balears Palma Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Àngels Esteller‐Cano, Investigació en Desenvolupament, Educació i Llenguatge (I+DEL), Institut de Recerca i Innovació Educativa (IRIE), Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain.

                Email: angels.esteller@ 123456uib.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-9906
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-8194
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1284-9955
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0286-6572
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4337-1325
                Article
                JLCD12708
                10.1111/1460-6984.12708
                9306547
                35195330
                65f2d81f-f906-4a4d-aed5-712b97c779ca
                © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 30 July 2021
                : 31 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 15, Words: 9426
                Categories
                Research Report
                Research Reports
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May/June 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:22.07.2022

                Neurosciences
                bullying,language difficulties,retrospective,schooling,victimisation
                Neurosciences
                bullying, language difficulties, retrospective, schooling, victimisation

                Comments

                Comment on this article