104
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Diagnosis of ‘specific’ language impairment traditionally required nonverbal IQ to be within normal limits, often resulting in restricted access to clinical services for children with lower NVIQ. Changes to DSM‐5 criteria for language disorder removed this NVIQ requirement. This study sought to delineate the impact of varying NVIQ criteria on prevalence, clinical presentation and functional impact of language disorder in the first UK population study of language impairment at school entry.

          Methods

          A population‐based survey design with sample weighting procedures was used to estimate population prevalence. We surveyed state‐maintained reception classrooms ( n = 161 or 61% of eligible schools) in Surrey, England. From a total population of 12,398 children (ages 4–5 years), 7,267 (59%) were screened. A stratified subsample ( n = 529) received comprehensive assessment of language, NVIQ, social, emotional and behavioural problems, and academic attainment.

          Results

          The total population prevalence estimate of language disorder was 9.92% (95% CI 7.38, 13.20). The prevalence of language disorder of unknown origin was estimated to be 7.58% (95% CI 5.33, 10.66), while the prevalence of language impairment associated with intellectual disability and/or existing medical diagnosis was 2.34% (95% CI 1.40, 3.91). Children with language disorder displayed elevated symptoms of social, emotional and behavioural problems relative to peers, F(1, 466) = 7.88, =  .05, and 88% did not make expected academic progress. There were no differences between those with average and low‐average NVIQ scores in severity of language deficit, social, emotional and behavioural problems, or educational attainment. In contrast, children with language impairments associated with known medical diagnosis and/or intellectual disability displayed more severe deficits on multiple measures.

          Conclusions

          At school entry, approximately two children in every class of 30 pupils will experience language disorder severe enough to hinder academic progress. Access to specialist clinical services should not depend on NVIQ.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

              R. Goodman (1997)
              A novel behavioural screening questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), was administered along with Rutter questionnaires to parents and teachers of 403 children drawn from dental and psychiatric clinics. Scores derived from the SDQ and Rutter questionnaires were highly correlated; parent-teacher correlations for the two sets of measures were comparable or favoured the SDQ. The two sets of measures did not differ in their ability to discriminate between psychiatric and dental clinic attenders. These preliminary findings suggest that the SDQ functions as well as the Rutter questionnaires while offering the following additional advantages: a focus on strengths as well as difficulties; better coverage of inattention, peer relationships, and prosocial behaviour; a shorter format; and a single form suitable for both parents and teachers, perhaps thereby increasing parent-teacher correlations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.norbury@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Child Psychol Psychiatry
                J Child Psychol Psychiatry
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7610
                JCPP
                Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0021-9630
                1469-7610
                16 May 2016
                November 2016
                : 57
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1111/jcpp.2016.57.issue-11 )
                : 1247-1257
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity College London LondonUK
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychology Royal HollowayUniversity of London LondonUK
                [ 3 ] Newcomen CentreSt Thomas’ Hospital LondonUK
                [ 4 ] Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London LondonUK
                [ 5 ] Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London LondonUK
                [ 6 ] Department of Biostatistics Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London LondonUK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Courtenay Frazier Norbury, Psychology and Language Sciences, Chandler House, Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PN, UK; Email: c.norbury@ 123456ucl.ac.uk

                Article
                JCPP12573
                10.1111/jcpp.12573
                5082564
                27184709
                13720642-ff1b-4be0-a055-6b92252393aa
                © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 April 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 11, Words: 8816
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: WT094836AIA
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London
                Funded by: Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
                Funded by: King's College London
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jcpp12573
                November 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.9.6 mode:remove_FC converted:27.10.2016

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                developmental language disorder,nviq discrepancy,prevalence,functional impairment

                Comments

                Comment on this article