8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lorlatinib in pretreated ALK- or ROS1-positive lung cancer and impact of TP53 co-mutations: results from the German early access program

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          We report on the results of the German early access program (EAP) with the third-generation ALK- and ROS1-inhibitor lorlatinib.

          Patients and Methods:

          Patients with documented treatment failure of all approved ALK/ROS1-specific therapies or with resistance mutations not covered by approved inhibitors or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis were enrolled and analyzed.

          Results:

          In total, 52 patients were included [median age 57 years (range 32–81), 54% female, 62% never smokers, 98% adenocarcinoma]; 71% and 29% were ALK- and ROS1-positive, respectively. G1202R and G2032R resistance mutations prior to treatment with lorlatinib were observed in 10 of 26 evaluable patients (39%), 11 of 39 patients showed TP53 mutations (28%). Thirty-six patients (69%) had active brain metastases (BM) and nine (17%) leptomeningeal carcinomatosis when entering the EAP. Median number of prior specific TKIs was 3 (range 1–4). Median duration of treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), response rate and time to treatment failure were 10.4 months, 8.0 months, 54% and 13.0 months. Calculated 12-, 18- and 24-months survival rates were 65, 54 and 47%, overall survival since primary diagnosis (OS2) reached 79.6 months. TP53 mutations were associated with a substantially reduced PFS (3.7 versus 10.8 month, HR 3.3, p = 0.003) and were also identified as a strong prognostic biomarker (HR for OS2 3.0 p = 0.02). Neither prior treatments with second-generation TKIs nor BM had a significant influence on PFS and OS.

          Conclusions:

          Our data from real-life practice demonstrate the efficacy of lorlatinib in mostly heavily pretreated patients, providing a clinically meaningful option for patients with resistance mutations not covered by other targeted therapies and those with BM or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

          Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

            Background Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. Methods In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. Results During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P<0.001); the median progression-free survival with alectinib was not reached. The results for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival were consistent with those for the primary end point. A total of 18 patients (12%) in the alectinib group had an event of CNS progression, as compared with 68 patients (45%) in the crizotinib group (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28; P<0.001). A response occurred in 126 patients in the alectinib group (response rate, 82.9%; 95% CI, 76.0 to 88.5) and in 114 patients in the crizotinib group (response rate, 75.5%; 95% CI, 67.8 to 82.1) (P=0.09). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with alectinib (41% vs. 50% with crizotinib). Conclusions As compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in primary treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ALEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075840 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer.

              The efficacy of the ALK inhibitor crizotinib as compared with standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. We conducted an open-label, phase 3 trial comparing crizotinib with chemotherapy in 343 patients with advanced ALK-positive nonsquamous NSCLC who had received no previous systemic treatment for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral crizotinib at a dose of 250 mg twice daily or to receive intravenous chemotherapy (pemetrexed, 500 mg per square meter of body-surface area, plus either cisplatin, 75 mg per square meter, or carboplatin, target area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Crossover to crizotinib treatment after disease progression was permitted for patients receiving chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent radiologic review. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with crizotinib than with chemotherapy (median, 10.9 months vs. 7.0 months; hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.60; P<0.001). Objective response rates were 74% and 45%, respectively (P<0.001). Median overall survival was not reached in either group (hazard ratio for death with crizotinib, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.26; P=0.36); the probability of 1-year survival was 84% with crizotinib and 79% with chemotherapy. The most common adverse events with crizotinib were vision disorders, diarrhea, nausea, and edema, and the most common events with chemotherapy were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and decreased appetite. As compared with chemotherapy, crizotinib was associated with greater reduction in lung cancer symptoms and greater improvement in quality of life. Crizotinib was superior to standard first-line pemetrexed-plus-platinum chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Pfizer; PROFILE 1014 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01154140.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ther Adv Med Oncol
                Ther Adv Med Oncol
                TAM
                sptam
                Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1758-8340
                1758-8359
                9 February 2021
                2021
                : 13
                : 1758835920980558
                Affiliations
                [1-1758835920980558]Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, D-13353, Germany Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Berlin, Germany
                [2-1758835920980558]Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, and Translational Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
                [3-1758835920980558]Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V University of Munich (LMU), Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich (TOM), Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Bayern, Germany
                [4-1758835920980558]Department of Internal Medicine II, University Clinic of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
                [5-1758835920980558]Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [6-1758835920980558]HELIOS Klinikum Emil-von-Behring, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin, Germany
                [7-1758835920980558]Department of Internal Medicine III (Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
                [8-1758835920980558]Department of Respiratory Medicine and Cardiology, Evangelisches Diakonissenkrankenhaus Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [9-1758835920980558]Department of Hematology and Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
                [10-1758835920980558]Hämato-Onkologie Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
                [11-1758835920980558]Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumonology, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
                [12-1758835920980558]Onkologie Dreiländereck, Lörrach, Germany
                [13-1758835920980558]Private Practice for Hematology and Oncology, Saalfeld, Germany
                [14-1758835920980558]Department of Hematology and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
                [15-1758835920980558]Institute for Hematopathology, Hamburg, Germany
                [16-1758835920980558]Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
                [17-1758835920980558]Department Internal Medicine-Oncology, Pius Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-7129
                Article
                10.1177_1758835920980558
                10.1177/1758835920980558
                7876585
                33613692
                65b8ce51-4f69-443a-937b-85f892f0031e
                © The Author(s), 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 15 September 2020
                : 17 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: German Research Foundation, ;
                Funded by: charité – universitätsmedizin berlin, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002839;
                Categories
                Advances in Treatment of Lung Cancer Patients with Targetable Mutations
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2021
                ts1

                alk,brain metastases,early access program,lorlatinib,nsclc,ros1,tp53

                Comments

                Comment on this article