11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preslaughter factors affecting mobility, blood parameters, bruising, and muscle pH of finished beef cattle in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Decades of work have focused on reducing fear, stress, and discomfort in cattle during the preslaughter phase by improving and promoting animal handling, transportation, and management processes. Even still, there is limited information about the effects of preslaughter factors on animal welfare and meat quality outcomes in finished cattle in the United States. This study aimed to track individual animals through the slaughter process to identify preslaughter factors associated with key welfare and quality outcomes. A total of 454 cattle from one commercial slaughter facility were studied. Preslaughter factors assessed included distance traveled, truck waiting time, lairage density, lairage duration, and season. Animal characteristics, i.e., body weight, breed, and sex, were also recorded. One trained observer scored the mobility of all cattle using the North American Meat Institute’s 1-4 scale (i.e., normal to extremely reluctant to move). Exsanguination blood was collected and analyzed for cortisol, creatine kinase, and lactate. Carcass bruising was scored using a modified version of the National Beef Quality Audit’s bruise-scoring methodology (i.e., no bruise, one bruise ≤ the size of a deck of cards, one bruise > than the size of a deck of cards, and multiple bruises). Ultimate muscle pH was measured 32 to 36 h postmortem. Multi-predictor models were selected for each outcome variable using Akaike Information Criterion. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models and categorical outcome variables with mixed-effect logistic regression models. Longer truck waiting times were associated with increased cortisol ( P = 0.04) and lactate ( P = 0.02) concentrations. Similarly, increased lairage duration was associated with increased creatine kinase concentrations ( P = 0.05) and the odds of cattle being bruised ( P = 0.03). Less space allowance per animal in lairage was associated with increased odds of cattle having impaired mobility ( P = 0.01). There was a seasonal effect for many of the measured outcomes; the summer season was associated with greater lactate concentrations ( P < 0.0001), increased odds of impaired mobility ( P < 0.0001), and increased odds of carcass bruising ( P = 0.003). The findings of this study indicate that many of the preslaughter factors assessed influence critical welfare and meat quality outcomes of finished beef cattle, warranting future research and consideration.

          Abstract

          This research investigates the complex relationships between preslaughter factors, animal welfare, and meat quality outcomes in a population of finished beef cattle. Several factors, including truck waiting time, lairage density and duration, and season were associated with physiological stress parameters, cattle mobility, and carcass bruising, further highlighting the importance of the preslaughter period for animal welfare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle.

            Data from 3 summer feedlot studies were utilized to determine the environmental factors that influence heat stress in cattle and also to determine wind speed (WSPD; m.s(-1)) and solar radiation (RAD; W.m(-2)) adjustments to the temperature-humidity index (THI). Visual assessments of heat stress, based on panting scores (0 = no panting to 4 = severe panting), were collected from 1400 to 1700. Mean daily WSPD, black globe temperature at 1500, and minimums for nighttime WSPD, nighttime black globe THI, and daily relative humidity were found to have the greatest influence on panting score from 1400 to 1700 (R2 = 0.61). From hourly values for THI, WSPD, and RAD, panting score was determined to equal -7.563 + (0.121 x THI) - (0.241 x WSPD) + (0.00082 x RAD) (R2 = 0.49). Using the ratio of WSPD to THI and RAD to THI (- 1.992 and 0.0068 for WSPD and RAD, respectively), adjustments to the THI were derived for WSPD and RAD. On the basis of these ratios and the average hourly data for 1400 to 1700, the THI, adjusted for WSPD and RAD, equals [4.51 + THI - (1.992 x WSPD) + (0.0068 x RAD)]. Four separate cattle studies, comparable in size, type of cattle, and number of observations to the 3 original studies, were utilized to evaluate the accuracy of the THI equation adjusted for WSPD and RAD, and the relationship between the adjusted THI and panting score. Mean panting score derived from individual observations of black-hided cattle in these 4 studies were 1.22, 0.94, 1.32, and 2.00 vs. the predicted panting scores of 1.15, 1.17, 1.30, and 1.96, respectively. Correlations between THI and panting score in these studies ranged from r = 0.47 to 0.87. Correlations between the adjusted THI and mean panting score ranged from r = 0.64 to 0.80. These adjustments would be most appropriate to use, within a day, to predict THI during the afternoon hours using hourly data or current conditions. In addition to afternoon conditions, nighttime conditions, including minimum WSPD, minimum black globe THI, and minimum THI, were also found to influence heat stress experienced by cattle. Although knowledge of THI alone is beneficial in determining the potential for heat stress, WSPD and RAD adjustments to the THI more accurately assess animal discomfort.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review.

              This paper reviews the effects of road transport on the welfare, carcass and meat quality of cattle, swine and poultry in North America (NA). The main effects of loading density, trailer microclimate, transport duration, animal size and condition, management factors including bedding, ventilation, handling, facilities, and vehicle design are summarized by species. The main effects listed above all have impacts on welfare (stress, health, injury, fatigue, dehydration, core body temperature, mortality and morbidity) and carcass and meat quality (shrink, bruising, pH, color defects and water losses) to varying degrees. It is clear that the effect of road transport is a multi-factorial problem where a combination of stressors rather than a single factor is responsible for the animal's well-being and meat quality post transport. Animals least fit for transport suffer the greatest losses in terms of welfare and meat quality while market ready animals (in particular cattle and pigs) in good condition appear to have fewer issues. More research is needed to identify the factors or combination of factors with the greatest negative impacts on welfare and meat quality relative to the species, and their size, age and condition under extreme environmental conditions. Future research needs to focus on controlled scientific assessments, under NA conditions, of varying loading densities, trailer design, microclimate, and handling quality during the transport process. Achieving optimal animal well-being, carcass and meat quality will entirely depend on the quality of the animal transport process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Transl Anim Sci
                Transl Anim Sci
                tranas
                Translational Animal Science
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2573-2102
                2024
                13 March 2024
                13 March 2024
                : 8
                : txae035
                Affiliations
                Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
                Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
                Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
                Department of Statistics, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
                Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
                Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-9899
                Article
                txae035
                10.1093/tas/txae035
                10983080
                38562213
                64d806d0-9cff-445c-81d3-a1911d6b4be8
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 January 2024
                : 12 March 2024
                : 01 April 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Animal Health and Well Being
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960

                cattle welfare indicators,dark cutting,fed cattle,meat quality,preslaughter stress,truck waiting time

                Comments

                Comment on this article