19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Naftopidil and propiverine hydrochloride for treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and concomitant overactive bladder: a prospective randomized controlled study.

      Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
      Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists, adverse effects, therapeutic use, Aged, Benzilates, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscarinic Antagonists, Naphthalenes, Piperazines, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Hyperplasia, complications, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urination, physiology, Urologic Diseases, drug therapy, etiology, physiopathology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To assess the efficacy and safety of propiverine hydrochloride (antimuscarinic), naftopidil (alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist) or both in patients with male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and concomitant overactive bladder (OAB). Men aged at least 50 years who had a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8 or higher and bladder dairy documenting micturition frequency (more than eight micturitions/24 h) and urgency (more than one episode/24 h), with or without urgency urinary incontinence were randomized into three groups: group N, naftopidil (50 mg once daily) only; group P, propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once daily); and group NP, naftopidil (50 mg once daily) plus propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once daily) for a 4-week treatment regimen. A total of 66 men, including 20 in group N, 23 in group P and 23 in group NP, were treated and 58 (87.9%) completed the 4 weeks of treatment. IPSS improved significantly in groups N and NP. Urinary frequency improved significantly in groups P and NP. Postvoid residual urine volume increased significantly in groups P and NP. Significant improvements in urgency episodes were noted in each group. One patient in group P required catheterization owing to acute urinary retention and another stopped medication because of difficulty in voiding. These results suggest that each treatment showed effectiveness for male LUTS with OAB. However, there are some possibilities of adverse effects with propiverine hydrochloride monotherapy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article