12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Paradox of diversity in the collective brain

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human societies are collective brains. People within every society have cultural brains—brains that have evolved to selectively seek out adaptive knowledge and socially transmit solutions. Innovations emerge at a population level through the transmission of serendipitous mistakes, incremental improvements and novel recombinations. The rate of innovation through these mechanisms is a function of (1) a society's size and interconnectedness (sociality), which affects the number of models available for learning; (2) fidelity of information transmission, which affects how much information is lost during social learning; and (3) cultural trait diversity, which affects the range of possible solutions available for recombination. In general, and perhaps surprisingly, all three levers can increase and harm innovation by creating challenges around coordination, conformity and communication. Here, we focus on the ‘paradox of diversity’—that cultural trait diversity offers the largest potential for empowering innovation, but also poses difficult challenges at both an organizational and societal level. We introduce ‘cultural evolvability’ as a framework for tackling these challenges, with implications for entrepreneurship, polarization and a nuanced understanding of the effects of diversity. This framework can guide researchers and practitioners in how to reap the benefits of diversity by reducing costs.

          This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references172

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The weirdest people in the world?

          Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Culture and Cognition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                January 31, 2022
                December 13, 2021
                December 13, 2021
                : 377
                : 1843 , Discussion meeting issue ‘The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines’ organized and edited by Andrew Whiten, Dora Biro, Ellen C. Garland and Simon Kirby
                : 20200316
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Organizational Behavior, University of Lausanne (UNIL), , Chavannes-près-Renens, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
                [ 2 ] Department of Biology, McGill University, , Dr Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Canada, H3A 1B1
                [ 3 ] Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), , Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
                [ 4 ] Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, , Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1M1
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5704503.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-8183
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-5763
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7079-5166
                Article
                rstb20200316
                10.1098/rstb.2020.0316
                8666911
                34894736
                64386b3e-71f8-4ef2-8b4f-d1d62e165504
                © 2021 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : June 19, 2021
                : October 6, 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007631;
                Award ID: 3368
                Categories
                1001
                70
                Articles
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                January 31, 2022

                Philosophy of science
                cultural evolution,diversity,collective intelligence,collective brain,innovation,evolvability

                Comments

                Comment on this article