11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology - present and future (Review)

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since its introduction in 1959, artificial intelligence technology has evolved rapidly and helped benefit research, industries and medicine. Deep learning, as a process of artificial intelligence (AI) is used in ophthalmology for data analysis, segmentation, automated diagnosis and possible outcome predictions. The association of deep learning and optical coherence tomography (OCT) technologies has proven reliable for the detection of retinal diseases and improving the diagnostic performance of the eye's posterior segment diseases. This review explored the possibility of implementing and using AI in establishing the diagnosis of retinal disorders. The benefits and limitations of AI in the field of retinal disease medical management were investigated by analyzing the most recent literature data. Furthermore, the future trends of AI involvement in ophthalmology were analyzed, as AI will be part of the decision-making regarding the scientific investigation, diagnosis and therapeutic management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Automated Identification of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Deep Learning

            Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable blindness globally. Performing retinal screening examinations on all diabetic patients is an unmet need, and there are many undiagnosed and untreated cases of DR. The objective of this study was to develop robust diagnostic technology to automate DR screening. Referral of eyes with DR to an ophthalmologist for further evaluation and treatment would aid in reducing the rate of vision loss, enabling timely and accurate diagnoses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

              Question Can an algorithm based on deep learning achieve expert-level performance at diagnosing plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity? Finding In this technology evaluation study including 5511 retinal photographs, using 5-fold cross-validation, the algorithm achieved mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 and 0.99 for the diagnoses of normal and plus disease, respectively. On an independent test set of 100 images, the algorithm achieved 91% accuracy and a quadratic-weighted κ coefficient of 0.92, outperforming 6 of 8 retinopathy of prematurity experts. Meaning These findings suggest the proposed algorithm can objectively diagnose plus disease with a proficiency comparable with human experts. This technology evaluation study examines the validity of an algorithm based on deep learning for automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity from retinal photographs. Importance Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. The decision to treat is primarily based on the presence of plus disease, defined as dilation and tortuosity of retinal vessels. However, clinical diagnosis of plus disease is highly subjective and variable. Objective To implement and validate an algorithm based on deep learning to automatically diagnose plus disease from retinal photographs. Design, Setting, and Participants A deep convolutional neural network was trained using a data set of 5511 retinal photographs. Each image was previously assigned a reference standard diagnosis (RSD) based on consensus of image grading by 3 experts and clinical diagnosis by 1 expert (ie, normal, pre–plus disease, or plus disease). The algorithm was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and tested on an independent set of 100 images. Images were collected from 8 academic institutions participating in the Imaging and Informatics in ROP (i-ROP) cohort study. The deep learning algorithm was tested against 8 ROP experts, each of whom had more than 10 years of clinical experience and more than 5 peer-reviewed publications about ROP. Data were collected from July 2011 to December 2016. Data were analyzed from December 2016 to September 2017. Exposures A deep learning algorithm trained on retinal photographs. Main Outcomes and Measures Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate performance of the algorithm against the RSD. Quadratic-weighted κ coefficients were calculated for ternary classification (ie, normal, pre–plus disease, and plus disease) to measure agreement with the RSD and 8 independent experts. Results Of the 5511 included retinal photographs, 4535 (82.3%) were graded as normal, 805 (14.6%) as pre–plus disease, and 172 (3.1%) as plus disease, based on the RSD. Mean (SD) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistics were 0.94 (0.01) for the diagnosis of normal (vs pre–plus disease or plus disease) and 0.98 (0.01) for the diagnosis of plus disease (vs normal or pre–plus disease). For diagnosis of plus disease in an independent test set of 100 retinal images, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 93% with 94% specificity. For detection of pre–plus disease or worse, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 94%, respectively. On the same test set, the algorithm achieved a quadratic-weighted κ coefficient of 0.92 compared with the RSD, outperforming 6 of 8 ROP experts. Conclusions and Relevance This fully automated algorithm diagnosed plus disease in ROP with comparable or better accuracy than human experts. This has potential applications in disease detection, monitoring, and prognosis in infants at risk of ROP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Exp Ther Med
                Exp Ther Med
                ETM
                Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
                D.A. Spandidos
                1792-0981
                1792-1015
                October 2020
                12 August 2020
                12 August 2020
                : 20
                : 4
                : 3469-3473
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Grigore T. Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iaşi, Romania
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology, ‘N. Oblu‘ Clinical Hospital, 700309 Iași, Romania
                [3 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Transmed Expert, 700011 Iaşi; 4‘Retina Center’ Eye Clinic, 700126 Iaşi, Romania
                [4 ]‘Retina Center’ Eye Clinic, 700126 Iași, Romania
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Professor Danuț Costin, Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Grigore T. Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 University Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania oftalmoconsultiasi@ 123456yahoo.ro

                *Contributed equally

                Article
                ETM-0-0-9118
                10.3892/etm.2020.9118
                7465350
                32905155
                63e993eb-d119-4343-8795-b149091523e5
                Copyright: © Moraru et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 29 May 2020
                : 30 June 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Medicine
                artificial intelligence,deep learning,convolutional neural networks,machine learning,ophthalmology,oct,image processing,image analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article