8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on grain and oilseed trade

      1 , 1 , 2
      Agribusiness
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper provides an ex‐post impact assessment of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on international grain and oilseed trade. We use a commodity‐level empirical model to assess the counterfactual trade effects and evaluate the region‐specific global trade reallocation effects. We find that grain and oilseed imports from Ukraine were 78.2% below the counterfactual between February and July 2022. The Russia–Ukraine war caused substantial trade diversion, mainly benefiting countries in North America and Europe. The adjustment of global grain and oilseed trade operates primarily through price adjustments, with considerable heterogeneity across commodity groups. Our ex‐ante analysis demonstrates that the Ukraine–Russia war had substantial trade implications for the directly involved countries but only limited ones for the global grain and oilseed markets in terms of traded quantity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Log of Gravity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

              Linear regressions with period and group fixed effects are widely used to estimate treatment effects. We show that they estimate weighted sums of the average treatment effects (ATE ) in each group and period, with weights that may be negative. Due to the negative weights, the linear regression coefficient may for instance be negative while all the ATEs are positive. We propose another estimator that solves this issue. In the two applications we revisit, it is significantly different from the linear regression estimator. (JEL C21, C23, D72, J31, J51, L82)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Agribusiness
                Agribusiness
                Wiley
                0742-4477
                1520-6297
                January 2023
                December 27 2022
                January 2023
                : 39
                : 1
                : 291-299
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut USA
                [2 ] Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA
                Article
                10.1002/agr.21794
                6277789a-90c8-4059-b0ab-e3194186cc6a
                © 2023

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article