Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Free vascularized fascia lata flap for total columella reconstruction

      , , ,
      American Journal of Otolaryngology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units.

          Facial reconstruction with only free microvascular flaps has rarely produced an aesthetic result. Menick stated, "Distant skin always appears as a mismatched patch within residual normal facial skin." In addition, earlier techniques using a single large nasal lining flap or bilateral nasal lining vaults incurred a high incidence of airway obstruction. The authors describe 10 consecutive patients requiring reconstruction of the nasal vestibule and columella lining from October of 1997 through May of 2005. Most of them also required reconstruction of the floor of the nose, the platform on which the alar bases and columella rest, and defects of the facial units adjacent to the nose. Aesthetic nasal reconstruction used two separate skin paddles to reconstruct the lining for the nasal vestibule and columella, an artistically constructed nasal framework made of cartilage, a forehead flap for cover, and other flaps and grafts to reconstruct adjacent facial unit defects. The average patient age was 41.8 years (range, 10.4 to 65.3 years). Follow-up (from the time of the first operative stage) averaged 26.4 months (range, 4 to 49 months). Nine patients had functional airways, and one required nasal airway support with internal silicone tubes. At the time of publication, eight patients had normal-appearing noses, and two were awaiting secondary surgery to correct persistent deformity. Microvascular free flaps have proved to be highly reliable and efficacious for restoration of missing elements of the nasal lining and adjacent facial soft-tissue defects in total and subtotal nasal reconstruction. Combined with a forehead flap, this aesthetic approach allows for reconstruction of the center of the face layer by layer and facial unit by facial unit. Specific attention is paid to the artistic creation of normal nasal dimensions, proportion, and form using carved and assembled cartilage grafts and by secondary subcutaneous contouring. In addition, this technique produces a patent airway.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Microvascular repair of heminasal, subtotal, and total nasal defects with a folded radial forearm flap and a full-thickness forehead flap.

            The site, size, and depth of tissue loss, irradiation, or composite injury to adjacent cheek and lip may make local tissues inadequate or unavailable for the repair of major nasal defects. In 13 patients, a single, folded, horizontal radial forearm flap was used to line the vault and columella, with an incontinuity fasciocutaneous extension to resurface the nasal floor, with or without primary dorsal support. Later, excess external forearm skin was turned over to adjust the nostril margin and alar base positions. Delayed primary cartilage grafts completed subunit support. A three-stage full-thickness forehead flap provided covering skin. Three-dimensional contouring of the midlayer framework was performed over the entire nasal surface, during an intermediate operation, before pedicle division. Good to excellent aesthetic and functional results were obtained in total and subtotal defects in five operations over 8 months, including a late revision. Partial necrosis of the folded columellar lining (n = 2) and dehiscence of unilateral alar lining (n = 1) were salvaged at forehead flap transfer by hinging over excess external forearm skin (n = 2) or by folding the extension of the forehead flap for columellar lining (n = 1). Indolent cartilage infection necessitated débridement (n = 4) and partial support replacement (n = 3). No free flaps were lost or required to salvage a complication. The approach is reliable, efficient, and applicable to varied defects and has the ability to correct design errors and complications before pedicle division. An unscarred lining sleeve, defined three-dimensional contour, and thin conforming skin cover are restored.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Nasal Lining

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Otolaryngology
                American Journal of Otolaryngology
                Elsevier BV
                01960709
                January 2022
                January 2022
                : 43
                : 1
                : 103226
                Article
                10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103226
                34782174
                623f45a5-4dd7-466b-81ff-9a96c966a041
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2,291

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors203