4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Demographic and health characteristics associated with fish and n-3 fatty acid supplement intake during pregnancy: results from pregnancy cohorts in the ECHO programme

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          n-3 fatty acid consumption during pregnancy is recommended for optimal pregnancy outcomes and offspring health. We examined characteristics associated with self-reported fish or n-3 supplement intake.

          Design:

          Pooled pregnancy cohort studies.

          Setting:

          Cohorts participating in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium with births from 1999 to 2020.

          Participants:

          A total of 10 800 pregnant women in twenty-three cohorts with food frequency data on fish consumption; 12 646 from thirty-five cohorts with information on supplement use.

          Results:

          Overall, 24·6 % reported consuming fish never or less than once per month, 40·1 % less than once a week, 22·1 % 1–2 times per week and 13·2 % more than twice per week. The relative risk (RR) of ever ( v. never) consuming fish was higher in participants who were older (1·14, 95 % CI 1·10, 1·18 for 35–40 v. <29 years), were other than non-Hispanic White (1·13, 95 % CI 1·08, 1·18 for non-Hispanic Black; 1·05, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·10 for non-Hispanic Asian; 1·06, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·10 for Hispanic) or used tobacco (1·04, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·08). The RR was lower in those with overweight v. healthy weight (0·97, 95 % CI 0·95, 1·0). Only 16·2 % reported n-3 supplement use, which was more common among individuals with a higher age and education, a lower BMI, and fish consumption (RR 1·5, 95 % CI 1·23, 1·82 for twice-weekly v. never).

          Conclusions:

          One-quarter of participants in this large nationwide dataset rarely or never consumed fish during pregnancy, and n-3 supplement use was uncommon, even among those who did not consume fish.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fish Oil-Derived Fatty Acids in Pregnancy and Wheeze and Asthma in Offspring.

          Background Reduced intake of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) may be a contributing factor to the increasing prevalence of wheezing disorders. We assessed the effect of supplementation with n-3 LCPUFAs in pregnant women on the risk of persistent wheeze and asthma in their offspring. Methods We randomly assigned 736 pregnant women at 24 weeks of gestation to receive 2.4 g of n-3 LCPUFA (fish oil) or placebo (olive oil) per day. Their children formed the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood2010 (COPSAC2010) cohort and were followed prospectively with extensive clinical phenotyping. Neither the investigators nor the participants were aware of group assignments during follow-up for the first 3 years of the children's lives, after which there was a 2-year follow-up period during which only the investigators were unaware of group assignments. The primary end point was persistent wheeze or asthma, and the secondary end points included lower respiratory tract infections, asthma exacerbations, eczema, and allergic sensitization. Results A total of 695 children were included in the trial, and 95.5% completed the 3-year, double-blind follow-up period. The risk of persistent wheeze or asthma in the treatment group was 16.9%, versus 23.7% in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.97; P=0.035), corresponding to a relative reduction of 30.7%. Prespecified subgroup analyses suggested that the effect was strongest in the children of women whose blood levels of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid were in the lowest third of the trial population at randomization: 17.5% versus 34.1% (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.83; P=0.011). Analyses of secondary end points showed that supplementation with n-3 LCPUFA was associated with a reduced risk of infections of the lower respiratory tract (31.7% vs. 39.1%; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.98; P=0.033), but there was no statistically significant association between supplementation and asthma exacerbations, eczema, or allergic sensitization. Conclusions Supplementation with n-3 LCPUFA in the third trimester of pregnancy reduced the absolute risk of persistent wheeze or asthma and infections of the lower respiratory tract in offspring by approximately 7 percentage points, or one third. (Funded by the Lundbeck Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00798226 .).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy

            Higher intakes of foods containing omega‐3 long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA), such as fish, during pregnancy have been associated with longer gestations and improved perinatal outcomes. This is an update of a review that was first published in 2006. To assess the effects of omega‐3 LCPUFA, as supplements or as dietary additions, during pregnancy on maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes and longer‐term outcomes for mother and child. For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth’s Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov , the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ( ICTRP ) (16 August 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing omega‐3 fatty acids (as supplements or as foods, stand‐alone interventions, or with a co‐intervention) during pregnancy with placebo or no omega‐3, and studies or study arms directly comparing omega‐3 LCPUFA doses or types. Trials published in abstract form were eligible for inclusion. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias in trials and assessed quality of evidence for prespecified birth/infant, maternal, child/adult and health service outcomes using the GRADE approach. In this update, we included 70 RCTs (involving 19,927 women at low, mixed or high risk of poor pregnancy outcomes) which compared omega‐3 LCPUFA interventions (supplements and food) compared with placebo or no omega‐3. Overall study‐level risk of bias was mixed, with selection and performance bias mostly at low risk, but there was high risk of attrition bias in some trials. Most trials were conducted in upper‐middle or high‐income countries; and nearly half the trials included women at increased/high risk for factors which might increase the risk of adverse maternal and birth outcomes. Preterm birth 42 weeks was probably increased from 1.6% to 2.6% in women who received omega‐3 LCPUFA compared with no omega‐3 (RR 1.61 95% CI 1.11 to 2.33; 5141 participants; 6 RCTs; moderate‐quality evidence ). For infants, there was a possibly reduced risk of perinatal death (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.03; 10 RCTs, 7416 participants; moderate‐quality evidence: 62/3715 versus 83/3701 infants) and possibly fewer neonatal care admissions (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.03; 9 RCTs, 6920 participants; moderate‐quality evidence ‐ 483/3475 infants versus 519/3445 infants). There was a reduced risk of low birthweight (LBW) babies (15.6% versus 14%; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; 15 trials, 8449 participants; high‐quality evidence); but a possible small increase in large‐for‐gestational age (LGA) babies (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.36; 6 RCTs, 3722 participants; moderate‐quality evidence, for omega‐3 LCPUFA compared with no omega‐3. Little or no difference in small‐for‐gestational age or intrauterine growth restriction (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.13; 8 RCTs, 6907 participants; moderate‐quality evidence) was seen. For the maternal outcomes , there is insufficient evidence to determine the effects of omega‐3 on induction post‐term (average RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.98; 3 trials, 2900 participants; low‐quality evidence), maternal serious adverse events (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.72; 2 trials, 2690 participants; low‐quality evidence), maternal admission to intensive care (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.63; 2 trials, 2458 participants; low‐quality evidence), or postnatal depression (average RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.77; 2 trials, 2431 participants; low‐quality evidence). Mean gestational length was greater in women who received omega‐3 LCPUFA (mean difference (MD) 1.67 days, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.39; 41 trials, 12,517 participants; moderate‐quality evidence), and pre‐eclampsia may possibly be reduced with omega‐3 LCPUFA (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.01; 20 trials, 8306 participants; low‐quality evidence). For the child/adult outcomes, very few differences between antenatal omega‐3 LCPUFA supplementation and no omega‐3 were observed in cognition, IQ, vision, other neurodevelopment and growth outcomes, language and behaviour (mostly low‐quality to very low‐quality evidence). The effect of omega‐3 LCPUFA on body mass index at 19 years (MD 0, 95% CI ‐0.83 to 0.83; 1 trial, 243 participants; very low‐quality evidence) was uncertain. No data were reported for development of diabetes in the children of study participants. In the overall analysis, preterm birth < 37 weeks and early preterm birth < 34 weeks were reduced in women receiving omega‐3 LCPUFA compared with no omega‐3. There was a possibly reduced risk of perinatal death and of neonatal care admission , a reduced risk of LBW babies; and possibly a small increased risk of LGA babies with omega‐3 LCPUFA. For our GRADE quality assessments, we assessed most of the important perinatal outcomes as high‐quality (e.g. preterm birth) or moderate‐quality evidence (e.g. perinatal death). For the other outcome domains (maternal, child/adult and health service outcomes) GRADE ratings ranged from moderate to very low, with over half rated as low. Reasons for downgrading across the domain were mostly due to design limitations and imprecision. Omega‐3 LCPUFA supplementation during pregnancy is an effective strategy for reducing the incidence of preterm birth, although it probably increases the incidence of post‐term pregnancies. More studies comparing omega‐3 LCPUFA and placebo (to establish causality in relation to preterm birth) are not needed at this stage. A further 23 ongoing trials are still to report on over 5000 women, so no more RCTs are needed that compare omega‐3 LCPUFA against placebo or no intervention. However, further follow‐up of completed trials is needed to assess longer‐term outcomes for mother and child, to improve understanding of metabolic, growth and neurodevelopment pathways in particular, and to establish if, and how, outcomes vary by different types of omega‐3 LCPUFA, timing and doses; or by characteristics of women. What is the issue? Do omega‐3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA) taken during pregnancy ‐ either as supplements or as dietary additions in food (such as some types of fish) ‐ improve health outcomes for babies and their mothers? This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was first published in 2006. Why is this important? Preterm birth (babies born before 37 weeks pregnancy (gestation)) is a leading cause of disability or death in the first five years of life. Fish and fish oil contain omega‐3 LCPUFA (particularly docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)) and have been associated with longer pregnancies. So it is suggested that additional omega‐3 LCPUFAs in pregnancy may reduce the number of babies born preterm and may improve outcomes for children and mothers. However, many pregnant women do not eat fish very often. Encouraging pregnant women to eat fatty fish (which generally have low toxin levels) or to use omega‐3 LCPUFA supplements may improve children’s and women's health. This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was first published in 2006. What evidence did we find? We searched for evidence in August 2018 and found 70 randomised controlled trials (RCTs; this type of trial provides the most reliable results) (involving 19,927 women). Most trials evaluated a group of women who received omega‐3 LCPUFA and compared them with a group of women who received something that looked like omega‐3 LCPUFA but did not contain it (placebo) or received no omega‐3. The trials were mostly undertaken in upper‐middle or high‐income countries. Some studies included women at increased risk of preterm birth. The quality of the evidence from the included studies ranged from high to very low; this affected the certainty of the findings for different outcomes. We found the incidence of preterm birth (before 37 weeks) and very preterm birth (before 34 weeks) was lower in women who received omega‐3 LCPUFA compared with no additional omega‐3. There were also fewer babies with low birthweight. However, omega‐3 LCPUFA probably increased the incidence of pregnancies continuing beyond 42 weeks, although there was no difference identified in induction of labour for post‐term pregnancies. The risk of the baby dying or being very sick and going to neonatal intensive care may be lower with omega‐3 LCPUFA compared with no omega‐3. We did not see any differences between groups for serious adverse events for mothers or in postnatal depression. Very few differences between the omega‐3 LCPUFA groups and no omega‐3 groups were observed in child development and growth. Eleven trials reported that they had received industry funding. When we omitted these trials from the main outcomes (such as preterm birth and very preterm birth) it made very little, or no difference, to the results. What does this mean? Increasing omega‐3 LCPUFA intake during pregnancy, either through supplements or in foods, may reduce the incidence of preterm birth (before 37 weeks and before 34 weeks) and there may be less chance of having a baby with a low birthweight. Women who take omega‐3 LCPUFA supplements during pregnancy may also be more likely to have longer pregnancies. More studies are underway and their results will be included in a further update of this review. Future studies could consider if and how outcomes may vary in different populations of women, and could test different ways of increasing omega‐3 LCPUFA during pregnancy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dietary fat intakes for pregnant and lactating women.

              , , (2007)
              Dietary fat intake in pregnancy and lactation affects pregnancy outcomes and child growth, development and health. The European Commission charged the research project PERILIP, jointly with the Early Nutrition Programming Project, to develop recommendations on dietary fat intake in pregnancy and lactation. Literature reviews were performed and a consensus conference held with international experts in the field, including representatives of international scientific associations. The adopted conclusions include: dietary fat intake in pregnancy and lactation (energy%) should be as recommended for the general population; pregnant and lactating women should aim to achieve an average dietary intake of at least 200 mg DHA/d; intakes of up to 1 g/d DHA or 2.7 g/d n-3 long-chain PUFA have been used in randomized clinical trials without significant adverse effects; women of childbearing age should aim to consume one to two portions of sea fish per week, including oily fish; intake of the DHA precursor, alpha-linolenic acid, is far less effective with regard to DHA deposition in fetal brain than preformed DHA; intake of fish or other sources of long-chain n-3 fatty acids results in a slightly longer pregnancy duration; dietary inadequacies should be screened for during pregnancy and individual counselling be offered if needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Public Health Nutr
                Public Health Nutr
                PHN
                Public Health Nutrition
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                1368-9800
                1475-2727
                2024
                27 February 2024
                : 27
                : 1
                : e94
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Division of Chronic Disease research across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute , 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, USA
                [ 2 ]Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, USA
                [ 3 ] RTI International , Raleigh, NC, USA
                [ 4 ] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, USA
                [ 5 ]Department of Pediatrics, Joseph M. Sanzari Children’s Hospital, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine , Nutley, NJ, USA
                [ 6 ] Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, NY, USA
                [ 7 ] Marshfield Clinic Research Institute , Marshfield, WI, USA
                [ 8 ]Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [ 9 ]Department of Medical Psychology, Charité University of Medicine Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [ 10 ]Development, Health, Disease Research Program, University of California Irvine , Irvine, CA, USA
                [ 11 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
                [ 12 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia , Athens, GA, USA
                [ 13 ]Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
                [ 14 ]Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, USA
                [ 15 ]Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine , New York, NY, USA
                [ 16 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [ 17 ] Avera Research Institute , Sioux Falls, SD, USA
                [ 18 ]Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Lebanon, NH, USA
                [ 19 ] New York State Psychiatric Institute , New York, NY, USA
                [ 20 ] Columbia University Irving Medical center , New York, NY, USA
                [ 21 ]Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Neuroscience, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester , Rochester, NY, USA
                [ 22 ]Brown Center for the Study of Children at Risk, Women and Infants Hospital , Providence, RI, USA
                [ 23 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System , Detroit, MI, USA
                [ 24 ] AJ Drexel Autism Institute , Philadelphia, PA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Email emily_oken@ 123456harvardpilgrim.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-3339
                Article
                S136898002400051X
                10.1017/S136898002400051X
                10993063
                38410088
                61e8daa5-e898-494e-b357-453e99edbabd
                © The Authors 2024

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2023
                : 16 January 2024
                : 13 February 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 33, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Short Communication
                Nutritional Epidemiology

                Public health
                pregnancy,fish,dha,n-3 fatty acid
                Public health
                pregnancy, fish, dha, n-3 fatty acid

                Comments

                Comment on this article