4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Virulence Differences in Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici from the Central and Eastern United States

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Phytopathology
      Scientific Societies

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          cooccur: Probabilistic Species Co-Occurrence Analysis inR

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Durable resistance of crops to disease: a Darwinian perspective.

            This review takes an evolutionary view of breeding crops for durable resistance to disease. An understanding of coevolution between hosts and parasites leads to predictors of potentially durable resistance, such as corresponding virulence having a high fitness cost to the pathogen or resistance being common in natural populations. High partial resistance can also promote durability. Whether or not resistance is actually durable, however, depends on ecological and epidemiological processes that stabilize genetic polymorphism, many of which are absent from intensive agriculture. There continues to be no biological, genetic, or economic model for durable resistance. The analogy between plant breeding and natural selection indicates that the basic requirements are genetic variation in potentially durable resistance, effective and consistent selection for resistance, and an efficient breeding process in which trials of disease resistance are integrated with other traits. Knowledge about genetics and mechanisms can support breeding for durable resistance once these fundamentals are in place.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chromosomal location of Pm35, a novel Aegilops tauschii derived powdery mildew resistance gene introgressed into common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

              A single gene controlling powdery mildew resistance was identified in the North Carolina germplasm line NC96BGTD3 (NCD3) using genetic analysis of F(2) derived lines from a NCD3 X Saluda cross. Microsatellite markers linked to this Pm gene were identified and their most likely order was Xcfd7, 10.3 cM, Xgdm43, 8.6 cM, Xcfd26, 11.9 cM, Pm gene. These markers and the Pm gene were assigned to chromosome 5DL by means of Chinese Spring Nullitetrasomic (Nulli5D-tetra5A) and ditelosomic (Dt5DL) lines. A detached leaf test showed a distinctive disease reaction to six pathogen isolates among the NCD3 Pm gene, Pm2 (5DS) and Pm34 (5DL). An allelism test showed independence between Pm34 and the NCD3 Pm gene. Together, the tests provided strong evidence for the presence of a novel Pm gene in NCD3, and this gene was designated Pm35.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Phytopathology
                Phytopathology
                Scientific Societies
                0031-949X
                March 2018
                March 2018
                : 108
                : 3
                : 402-411
                Affiliations
                [1 ]First author: Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC; and first, second, and fourth authors: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, third author: Department of Statistics, and fifth author: Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695.
                Article
                10.1094/PHYTO-06-17-0211-R
                29082810
                6191b38c-57d7-4eea-945d-4f71380bf2b4
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article