104
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met+SU): a randomised controlled trial

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 9 , on behalf of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes 5 (LEAD-5) met+SU Study Group
      Diabetologia
      Springer-Verlag
      DPP-4, Exenatide, Incretin, Insulin glargine, LEAD-5

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims/hypothesis

          The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus vs placebo and insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin), all in combination with metformin and glimepiride.

          Methods

          This randomised (using a telephone or web-based randomisation system), parallel-group, controlled 26 week trial of 581 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on prior monotherapy (HbA 1c 7.5–10%) and combination therapy (7.0–10%) was conducted in 107 centres in 17 countries. The primary endpoint was HbA 1c. Patients were randomised (2:1:2) to liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily ( n = 232), liraglutide placebo ( n = 115) and open-label insulin glargine ( n = 234), all in combination with metformin (1 g twice daily) and glimepiride (4 mg once daily). Investigators, participants and study monitors were blinded to the treatment status of the liraglutide and placebo groups at all times.

          Results

          The number of patients analysed as intention to treat were: liraglutide n = 230, placebo n = 114, insulin glargine n = 232. Liraglutide reduced HbA 1c significantly vs glargine (1.33% vs 1.09%; −0.24% difference, 95% CI 0.08, 0.39; p = 0.0015) and placebo (−1.09% difference, 95% CI 0.90, 1.28; p < 0.0001). There was greater weight loss with liraglutide vs placebo (treatment difference –1.39 kg, 95% CI 2.10, 0.69; p = 0.0001), and vs glargine (treatment difference −3.43 kg, 95% CI 4.00, 2.86; p < 0.0001). Liraglutide reduced systolic BP (−4.0 mmHg) vs glargine (+0.5 mmHg; −4.5 mmHg difference, 95% CI 6.8, −2.2; p = 0.0001) but not vs placebo ( p = 0.0791). Rates of hypoglycaemic episodes (major, minor and symptoms only, respectively) were 0.06, 1.2 and 1.0 events/patient/year, respectively, in the liraglutide group (vs 0, 1.3, 1.8 and 0, 1.0, 0.5 with glargine and placebo, respectively). A slightly higher number of adverse events (including nausea at 14%) were reported with liraglutide, but only 9.8% of participants in the group receiving liraglutide developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.

          Conclusions/interpretation

          Liraglutide added to metformin and sulfonylurea produced significant improvement in glycaemic control and bodyweight compared with placebo and insulin glargine. The difference vs insulin glargine in HbA 1c was within the predefined non-inferiority margin.

          Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00331851
          Funding: The study was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S.
          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-009-1472-y) contains a list of members of the LEAD-5 Study Group, which is available to authorised users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.

          To compare the abilities and associated hypoglycemia risks of insulin glargine and human NPH insulin added to oral therapy of type 2 diabetes to achieve 7% HbA(1c). In a randomized, open-label, parallel, 24-week multicenter trial, 756 overweight men and women with inadequate glycemic control (HbA(1c) >7.5%) on one or two oral agents continued prestudy oral agents and received bedtime glargine or NPH once daily, titrated using a simple algorithm seeking a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Glycemic Control With Diet, Sulfonylurea, Metformin, or Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusProgressive Requirement for Multiple Therapies (UKPDS 49)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and a sulfonylurea.

              This study evaluated the effects of exenatide, a novel incretin mimetic, in hyperglycemic patients with type 2 diabetes unable to achieve glycemic control with metformin-sulfonylurea combination therapy. A 30-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 733 subjects (aged 55 +/- 10 years, BMI 33.6 +/- 5.7 kg/m(2), A1C 8.5 +/- 1.0%; means +/- SD) randomized to 5 microg subcutaneous exenatide b.i.d. (arms A and B) or placebo for 4 weeks. Thereafter, arm A remained at 5 microg b.i.d. and arm B escalated to 10 microg b.i.d. Subjects continued taking their dose of metformin and were randomized to either maximally effective (MAX) or minimum recommended (MIN) doses of sulfonylurea. Week 30 A1C changes from baseline (+/-SE) were -0.8 +/- 0.1% (10 microg), -0.6 +/- 0.1% (5 microg), and +0.2 +/- 0.1% (placebo; adjusted P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), yielding placebo-adjusted reductions of -1.0% (10 microg) and -0.8% (5 microg). In the evaluable population, exenatide-treated subjects were more likely to achieve A1C < or =7% than placebo-treated subjects (34% [10 microg], 27% [5 microg], and 9% [placebo]; P < 0.0001). Both exenatide arms demonstrated significant weight loss (-1.6 +/- 0.2 kg from baseline each exenatide arm, -0.9 +/- 0.2 kg placebo; P < or = 0.01 vs. placebo). Mild or moderate nausea was the most frequent adverse event. The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was 28% (10 microg), 19% (5 microg), and 13% (placebo) and appeared lower with MIN than with MAX sulfonylurea treatment. Exenatide significantly reduced A1C in patients with type 2 diabetes unable to achieve adequate glycemic control with maximally effective doses of combined metformin-sulfonylurea therapy. This improvement in glycemic control was associated with no weight gain and was generally well tolerated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                drj@royalsurrey.nhs.uk
                Journal
                Diabetologia
                Diabetologia
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0012-186X
                1432-0428
                14 August 2009
                October 2009
                : 52
                : 10
                : 2046-2055
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Guildford Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX UK
                [2 ]Department of Endocrinology, Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark
                [3 ]University Hospital, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
                [4 ]Care Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
                [5 ]School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
                [6 ]Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases Clinic, Niš, Serbia
                [7 ]Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
                [8 ]CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (CIBERDEM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III,
                [9 ]Diabetes Research Unit, Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
                Article
                1472
                10.1007/s00125-009-1472-y
                2744824
                19688338
                60d7a6b0-9dba-4b6e-b51e-956ef51743a2
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 18 May 2009
                : 30 June 2009
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2009

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                dpp-4,lead-5,incretin,exenatide,insulin glargine
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                dpp-4, lead-5, incretin, exenatide, insulin glargine

                Comments

                Comment on this article