16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing to Predict Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cancer

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This pilot cohort study estimates sensitivity and specificity of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing for its ability to predict bloodstream infection in patients at high risk of life-threatening infection.

          Key Points

          Question

          Might plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing (mcfDNA-seq) predict bloodstream infection (BSI) in immunocompromised patients days before the onset of attributable symptoms?

          Findings

          This pilot cohort study included 47 pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory cancer. The causative pathogen was identified by mcfDNA-seq in the 3 days before onset of BSI in 12 of 16 episodes; of 33 negative control samples collected from the same patient population, mcfDNA-seq was negative in 27 and identified no common pathogens in 30.

          Meaning

          In patients with imminent BSI, it appears that mcfDNA-seq can identify clinically relevant pathogens days before onset of attributable symptoms.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common, life-threatening complication of treatment for cancer. Predicting BSI before onset of clinical symptoms would enable preemptive therapy, but there is no reliable screening test.

          Objective

          To estimate sensitivity and specificity of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing (mcfDNA-seq) for predicting BSI in patients at high risk of life-threatening infection.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A prospective pilot cohort study of mcfDNA-seq for predicting BSI in pediatric patients (<25 years of age) with relapsed or refractory cancers at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, a specialist quaternary pediatric hematology-oncology referral center. Remnant clinical blood samples were collected during chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. Samples collected during the 7 days before and at onset of BSI episodes, along with negative control samples from study participants, underwent blinded testing using a mcfDNA-seq test in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments/College of American Pathologists–approved laboratory.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcomes were sensitivity of mcfDNA-seq for detecting a BSI pathogen during the 3 days before BSI onset and specificity of mcfDNA-seq in the absence of fever or infection in the preceding or subsequent 7 days.

          Results

          Between August 9, 2017, and June 4, 2018, 47 participants (27 [57%] male; median age [IQR], 10 [5-14] years) were enrolled; 19 BSI episodes occurred in 12 participants, and predictive samples were available for 16 episodes, including 15 bacterial BSI episodes. In the 3 days before the onset of infection, predictive sensitivity of mcfDNA-seq was 75% for all BSIs (12 of 16; 95% CI, 51%-90%) and 80% (12 of 15; 95% CI, 55%-93%) for bacterial BSIs. The specificity of mcfDNA-seq, evaluated on 33 negative control samples from enrolled participants, was 82% (27 of 33; 95% CI, 66%-91%) for any bacterial or fungal organism and 91% (30 of 33; 95% CI, 76%-97%) for any common BSI pathogen, and the concentration of pathogen DNA was lower in control than predictive samples.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          A clinically relevant pathogen can be identified by mcfDNA-seq days before the onset of BSI in a majority of episodes, potentially enabling preemptive treatment. Clinical application appears feasible pending further study.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03226158

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics.

          Although general definitions of the sepsis continuum have been published for adults, no such work has been done for the pediatric population. Physiologic and laboratory variables used to define the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and organ dysfunction require modification for the developmental stages of children. An international panel of 20 experts in sepsis and clinical research from five countries (Canada, France, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States) was convened to modify the published adult consensus definitions of infection, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, and organ dysfunction for children. Consensus conference. This document describes the issues surrounding consensus on four major questions addressed at the meeting: a) How should the pediatric age groups affected by sepsis be delineated? b) What are the specific definitions of pediatric SIRS, infection, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock? c) What are the specific definitions of pediatric organ failure and the validity of pediatric organ failure scores? d) What are the appropriate study populations and study end points required to successfully conduct clinical trials in pediatric sepsis? Five subgroups first met separately and then together to evaluate the following areas: signs and symptoms of sepsis, cell markers, cytokines, microbiological data, and coagulation variables. All conference participants approved the final draft of the proceedings of the meeting. Conference attendees modified the current criteria used to define SIRS and sepsis in adults to incorporate pediatric physiologic variables appropriate for the following subcategories of children: newborn, neonate, infant, child, and adolescent. In addition, the SIRS definition was modified so that either criteria for fever or white blood count had to be met. We also defined various organ dysfunction categories, severe sepsis, and septic shock specifically for children. Although no firm conclusion was made regarding a single appropriate study end point, a novel nonmortality end point, organ failure-free days, was considered optimal for pediatric clinical trials given the relatively low incidence of mortality in pediatric sepsis compared with adult populations. We modified the adult SIRS criteria for children. In addition, we revised definitions of severe sepsis and septic shock for the pediatric population. Our goal is for these first-generation pediatric definitions and criteria to facilitate the performance of successful clinical studies in children with sepsis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

              The primary objective of a phase II clinical trial of a new drug or regimen is to determine whether it has sufficient biological activity against the disease under study to warrant more extensive development. Such trials are often conducted in a multi-institution setting where designs of more than two stages are difficult to manage. This paper presents two-stage designs that are optimal in the sense that the expected sample size is minimized if the regimen has low activity subject to constraints upon the size of the type 1 and type 2 errors. Two-stage designs which minimize the maximum sample size are also determined. Optimum and "minimax" designs for a range of design parameters are tabulated. These designs can also be used for pilot studies of new regimens where toxicity is the endpoint of interest.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                19 December 2019
                April 2020
                27 February 2020
                19 December 2019
                : 6
                : 4
                : 552-556
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
                [2 ]Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
                [3 ]Karius Inc, Redwood City, California
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
                [5 ]Department of Pediatrics, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
                [6 ]Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
                [7 ]Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [8 ]Department of Computational Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 28, 2019.
                Published Online: December 19, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4120
                Correction: This article was corrected on February 27, 2020, to change to CC-BY-NC-ND open access status.
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2019 Goggin KP et al. JAMA Oncology.
                Corresponding Authors: Joshua Wolf, MBBS, PhD, FRACP, Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Mailstop 320, Memphis, TN 38105 ( joshua.wolf@ 123456stjude.org ) and Charles Gawad, MD, PhD, Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Mailstop 1260, Memphis, TN 38105 ( charles.gawad@ 123456stjude.org ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Wolf and Gawad had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Wolf and Gawad contributed equally to the study.
                Concept and design: Goggin, Hong, Wolf, Gawad.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Goggin, Gonzalez-Pena, Inaba, Hong, Natarajan, Kuenzinger, Sun, Wolf, Gawad.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Goggin, Allison, Hong, Ahmed, Hollemon, Mahmud, Youssef, Brenner, Maron, Choi, Rubnitz, Tang, Wolf, Gawad.
                Statistical analysis: Sun, Tang, Wolf.
                Obtained funding: Wolf, Gawad.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Gonzalez-Pena, Inaba, Allison, Hong, Hollemon, Natarajan, Brenner, Choi, Rubnitz, Wolf, Gawad.
                Supervision: Wolf, Gawad.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ahmed reports being an employee of Karius Inc. Dr Brenner reports receiving nonfinancial support from Karius Inc and grants from the National Cancer Institute. Dr Gawad reports receiving nonfinancial support from Karius Inc; support from a Career Award for Medical Scientists from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, a Scholar Award from the Hyundai Foundation for Pediatric Cancer Research, and a Special Fellow award from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society; and developmental funds from the St Jude Children’s Research Hospital Cancer Center. Ms Hollemon reports being an employee of Karius Inc. Dr Hong reports receiving personal fees as an employee of Karius Inc. Dr Inaba reports receiving nonfinancial support from Karius Inc. Dr Wolf reports receiving nonfinancial support from Karius Inc and research support from Merck, Astellas, Cempra, and CareFusion. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities and Karius Inc.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Karius Inc had no role in the design or conduct of the study. Representatives of Karius Inc were involved in sample processing; management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review and approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Keith Laycock, PhD, for editorial support, Jose Ferrolino, MD, for database support, and Kristen Branum, BS, for advice about study design and conduct, as well as Aditya Gaur, MD, and the Children’s Hospital Association Childhood Cancer & Blood Disorders Network for directly providing a list of organisms from blood cultures from their bloodstream infections database to help develop a list of common bloodstream infections pathogens in children with cancer. Dr Laycock, Dr Ferrolino, and Ms Branum were compensated by St Jude for their contributions.
                Article
                cbr190011
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4120
                6990667
                31855231
                5fcf3b24-dad6-4a40-b407-834ab4e188bb
                Copyright 2019 Goggin KP et al. JAMA Oncology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 12 June 2019
                : 28 July 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Brief Report
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article