95
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of cancer treatment. Although rare, fulminant and fatal toxic effects may complicate these otherwise transformative therapies; characterizing these events requires integration of global data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation.

          Over the past decade, advances have been made in the care of patients undergoing transplantation. We conducted a study to determine whether these advances have improved the outcomes of transplantation. We analyzed overall mortality, mortality not preceded by relapse, recurrent malignant conditions, and the frequency and severity of major complications of transplantation, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and hepatic, renal, pulmonary, and infectious complications, among 1418 patients who received their first allogeneic transplants at our center in Seattle in the period from 1993 through 1997 and among 1148 patients who received their first allogeneic transplants in the period from 2003 through 2007. Components of the Pretransplant Assessment of Mortality (PAM) score were used in regression models to adjust for the severity of illness at the time of transplantation. In the 2003-2007 period, as compared with the 1993-1997 period, we observed significant decreases in mortality not preceded by relapse, both at day 200 (by 60%) and overall (by 52%), the rate of relapse or progression of a malignant condition (by 21%), and overall mortality (by 41%), after adjustment for components of the PAM score. The results were similar when the analyses were limited to patients who received myeloablative conditioning therapy. We also found significant decreases in the risk of severe GVHD; disease caused by viral, bacterial, and fungal infections; and damage to the liver, kidneys, and lungs. We found a substantial reduction in the hazard of death related to allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation, as well as increased long-term survival, over the past decade. Improved outcomes appear to be related to reductions in organ damage, infection, and severe acute GVHD. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              VigiBase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: Basic Facts

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncology
                JAMA Oncol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2374-2437
                December 01 2018
                December 01 2018
                : 4
                : 12
                : 1721
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
                [3 ]INSERM, UMR ICAN 1166, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
                [6 ]National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [7 ]Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [8 ]Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [9 ]University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [10 ]Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [11 ]Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [12 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Westmeade Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [13 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [14 ]Department of Cutaneous Oncology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
                Article
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923
                6440712
                30242316
                5f6a8954-1905-4096-a24d-e079ee5f364c
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article