103
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MD 1 , 2 , 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , MD 6 , , PhD 7 , , PhD 7 , , MD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MSN 5 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD 1 , , PharmD, PhD 1 , , PharmD 5 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , MBBS, PhD 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , , MBBS 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , , MD 2 , 3 , , MD 14 , , MD 6 , , MBBS, PhD 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , , MD 5 , , MD 4 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 ,
      JAMA Oncology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the spectrum, timing, and incidence of fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors?

          Findings

          A broad range of regimen-specific toxic effects caused fatalities in 0.3% to 1.3% of treated patients; fatal toxic effects tended to occur very early in treatment (median of 40 and 14.5 days for monotherapy and combination immunotherapy, respectively).

          Meaning

          Fatal toxic effects from immune checkpoint inhibitors are rare but have diverse causes; awareness is needed among clinicians across disciplines given the increase in use of these agents.

          Abstract

          This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzes the incidence of regimen-specific fatal toxic effects associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of cancer treatment. Although rare, fulminant and fatal toxic effects may complicate these otherwise transformative therapies; characterizing these events requires integration of global data.

          Objective

          To determine the spectrum, timing, and clinical features of fatal ICI-associated toxic effects.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          We retrospectively queried a World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database (Vigilyze) comprising more than 16 000 000 adverse drug reactions, and records from 7 academic centers. We performed a meta-analysis of published trials of anti–programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) to evaluate their incidence using data from large academic medical centers, global WHO pharmacovigilance data, and all published ICI clinical trials of patients with cancer treated with ICIs internationally.

          Exposures

          Anti–CTLA-4 (ipilimumab or tremelimumab), anti–PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), or anti–PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Timing, spectrum, outcomes, and incidence of ICI-associated toxic effects.

          Results

          Internationally, 613 fatal ICI toxic events were reported from 2009 through January 2018 in Vigilyze. The spectrum differed widely between regimens: in a total of 193 anti–CTLA-4 deaths, most were usually from colitis (135 [70%]), whereas anti–PD-1/PD-L1–related fatalities were often from pneumonitis (333 [35%]), hepatitis (115 [22%]), and neurotoxic effects (50 [15%]). Combination PD-1/CTLA-4 deaths were frequently from colitis (32 [37%]) and myocarditis (22 [25%]). Fatal toxic effects typically occurred early after therapy initiation for combination therapy, anti–PD-1, and ipilimumab monotherapy (median 14.5, 40, and 40 days, respectively). Myocarditis had the highest fatality rate (52 [39.7%] of 131 reported cases), whereas endocrine events and colitis had only 2% to 5% reported fatalities; 10% to 17% of other organ-system toxic effects reported had fatal outcomes. Retrospective review of 3545 patients treated with ICIs from 7 academic centers revealed 0.6% fatality rates; cardiac and neurologic events were especially prominent (43%). Median time from symptom onset to death was 32 days. A meta-analysis of 112 trials involving 19 217 patients showed toxicity-related fatality rates of 0.36% (anti–PD-1), 0.38% (anti–PD-L1), 1.08% (anti–CTLA-4), and 1.23% (PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In the largest evaluation of fatal ICI-associated toxic effects published to date to our knowledge, we observed early onset of death with varied causes and frequencies depending on therapeutic regimen. Clinicians across disciplines should be aware of these uncommon lethal complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation.

          Over the past decade, advances have been made in the care of patients undergoing transplantation. We conducted a study to determine whether these advances have improved the outcomes of transplantation. We analyzed overall mortality, mortality not preceded by relapse, recurrent malignant conditions, and the frequency and severity of major complications of transplantation, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and hepatic, renal, pulmonary, and infectious complications, among 1418 patients who received their first allogeneic transplants at our center in Seattle in the period from 1993 through 1997 and among 1148 patients who received their first allogeneic transplants in the period from 2003 through 2007. Components of the Pretransplant Assessment of Mortality (PAM) score were used in regression models to adjust for the severity of illness at the time of transplantation. In the 2003-2007 period, as compared with the 1993-1997 period, we observed significant decreases in mortality not preceded by relapse, both at day 200 (by 60%) and overall (by 52%), the rate of relapse or progression of a malignant condition (by 21%), and overall mortality (by 41%), after adjustment for components of the PAM score. The results were similar when the analyses were limited to patients who received myeloablative conditioning therapy. We also found significant decreases in the risk of severe GVHD; disease caused by viral, bacterial, and fungal infections; and damage to the liver, kidneys, and lungs. We found a substantial reduction in the hazard of death related to allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation, as well as increased long-term survival, over the past decade. Improved outcomes appear to be related to reductions in organ damage, infection, and severe acute GVHD. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              VigiBase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: Basic Facts

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                13 September 2018
                December 2018
                11 October 2018
                13 September 2019
                : 4
                : 12
                : 1721-1728
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance Unit, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
                [3 ]INSERM, UMR ICAN 1166, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
                [6 ]National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [7 ]Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [8 ]Melanoma Institute of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [9 ]University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [10 ]Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [11 ]Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [12 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Westmeade Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [13 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [14 ]Department of Cutaneous Oncology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Corresponding Author: Douglas B. Johnson, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Ave, 777 Preston Research Bldg, Nashville, TN 37232 ( douglas.b.johnson@ 123456vumc.org ).
                Accepted for Publication: June 6, 2018.
                Correction: This article was corrected on October 11, 2018, to fix the fatality rate percentage for adrenal depicted in Figure 1C.
                Published Online: September 13, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923
                Author Contributions: Dr Johnson had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Study concept and design: Wang, Salem, Chandra, Das, Balko, Chism, Long, Hassel, Moslehi, Johnson.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Wang, Salem, Cohen, Menzer, Ye, Zhao, Das, Beckermann, Ha, Rathmell, Ancell, Balko, Bowman, Davis, Horn, Long, Carlino, Lebrun-Vignes, Eroglu, Hassel, Menzies, Sosman, Sullivan, Johnson.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Wang, Chandra, Ye, Balko, Long, Menzies, Sosman, Sullivan, Moslehi, Johnson.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Wang, Salem, Cohen, Menzer, Zhao, Das, Beckermann, Ha, Rathmell, Ancell, Balko, Bowman, Davis, Chism, Horn, Long, Carlino, Lebrun-Vignes, Eroglu, Hassel, Menzies, Sosman, Sullivan, Moslehi, Johnson.
                Statistical analysis: Wang, Ye, Zhao, Long, Johnson.
                Obtained funding: Rathmell, Johnson.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Salem, Ha, Rathmell, Bowman, Chism, Long, Carlino, Hassel, Menzies, Sullivan, Johnson.
                Study supervision: Salem, Menzer, Rathmell, Lebrun-Vignes, Hassel, Moslehi, Johnson.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Johnson serves on advisory boards for Array Biopharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, and Navigate BP, and receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. Dr Rathmell receives research funding from Incyte. Dr Menzies serves on advisory boards for BMS, MSD Merck, Novartis, Roche and Pierre-Fabre. Dr Long serves on advisory boards and steering committees for Amgen, Array Biopharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre and Roche. Dr Sosman serves on Advisory Boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Genentech, and Curis. No other disclosures are reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by The Cancer ITMO of the French National Alliance for Life and Health Sciences (AVIESAN): “Plan Cancer 2014-2019” (Drs Salem and Lebrun-Vignes) by NIH/NCI K23 CA204726 (Dr Johnson), NIH K24 CA172355 (Dr Rathmell), the James C. Bradford Jr Melanoma Fund (Dr Johnson), and the Melanoma Research Foundation (Dr Johnson).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The National Alliance for Life and Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, the James C. Bradford Jr Melanoma Fund, and the Melanoma Research Foundation had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The supplied data from Vigilyze come from a variety of sources. The likelihood of a causal relationship is not the same in all reports. The information does not represent the opinion of the World Health Organization.
                Article
                PMC6440712 PMC6440712 6440712 coi180071
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923
                6440712
                30242316
                5f6a8954-1905-4096-a24d-e079ee5f364c
                Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
                History
                : 18 May 2018
                : 27 June 2018
                : 28 June 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article