2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      How to Read, Write, and Review the Imaging Literature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

          In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide to reviewing a manuscript that we hope will improve the quality of reviews for the AJR. We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The template we have provided can be used to serve as a checklist for important questions to ask about manuscripts during the review process. Finally, the principles presented here also can be used as a guide for authors by providing a list of important features to include during manuscript preparation and thereby prospectively address questions that good reviewers are likely to ask.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators.

            Writing scientific manuscripts can be unnecessarily daunting, if not paralyzing. This paralysis is usually the result of one of two reasons: either researchers do not know how to start, or they do not know what to put where. However, most radiology manuscripts follow a definable blueprint. In this article, I attempt to lay out the paragraph-by-paragraph development of a typical radiology paper. If authors can accomplish the writing of the 18 paragraphs of text described in this article, they will produce a manuscript that is properly organized, correct in its essentials, and ready for the finishing hand of a seasoned writer and mentor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

              The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are an important effort aimed at establishing when imaging should be used in medicine. However, substantial improvements in the Appropriateness Criteria are necessary for them to meet current standards for evidence-based guidelines. In this article, we provide concrete suggestions for improving the evidence basis of the Appropriateness Criteria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
                Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
                Elsevier BV
                03630188
                March 2021
                March 2021
                : 50
                : 2
                : 109-114
                Article
                10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.002
                32024599
                5f5daaac-1ea7-49a4-921f-e480d4eef44d
                © 2021

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                8
                0
                4
                0
                Smart Citations
                8
                0
                4
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content4,180

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors71