16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Key Challenges and Opportunities Associated with the Use of In Vitro Models to Detect Human DILI: Integrated Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plans

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of late-stage clinical drug attrition, market withdrawal, black-box warnings, and acute liver failure. Consequently, it has been an area of focus for toxicologists and clinicians for several decades. In spite of considerable efforts, limited improvements in DILI prediction have been made and efforts to improve existing preclinical models or develop new test systems remain a high priority. While prediction of intrinsic DILI has improved, identifying compounds with a risk for idiosyncratic DILI (iDILI) remains extremely challenging because of the lack of a clear mechanistic understanding and the multifactorial pathogenesis of idiosyncratic drug reactions. Well-defined clinical diagnostic criteria and risk factors are also missing. This paper summarizes key data interpretation challenges, practical considerations, model limitations, and the need for an integrated risk assessment. As demonstrated through selected initiatives to address other types of toxicities, opportunities exist however for improvement, especially through better concerted efforts at harmonization of current, emerging and novel in vitro systems or through the establishment of strategies for implementation of preclinical DILI models across the pharmaceutical industry. Perspectives on the incorporation of newer technologies and the value of precompetitive consortia to identify useful practices are also discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references119

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells as a model for familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

            Characterized by ventricular dilatation, systolic dysfunction, and progressive heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most common form of cardiomyopathy in patients. DCM is the most common diagnosis leading to heart transplantation and places a significant burden on healthcare worldwide. The advent of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offers an exceptional opportunity for creating disease-specific cellular models, investigating underlying mechanisms, and optimizing therapy. Here, we generated cardiomyocytes from iPSCs derived from patients in a DCM family carrying a point mutation (R173W) in the gene encoding sarcomeric protein cardiac troponin T. Compared to control healthy individuals in the same family cohort, cardiomyocytes derived from iPSCs from DCM patients exhibited altered regulation of calcium ion (Ca(2+)), decreased contractility, and abnormal distribution of sarcomeric α-actinin. When stimulated with a β-adrenergic agonist, DCM iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes showed characteristics of cellular stress such as reduced beating rates, compromised contraction, and a greater number of cells with abnormal sarcomeric α-actinin distribution. Treatment with β-adrenergic blockers or overexpression of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) adenosine triphosphatase (Serca2a) improved the function of iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from DCM patients. Thus, iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from DCM patients recapitulate to some extent the morphological and functional phenotypes of DCM and may serve as a useful platform for exploring disease mechanisms and for drug screening.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity.

              The occurrence of idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity is a major problem in all phases of clinical drug development and the most frequent cause of post-marketing warnings and withdrawals. This review examines the clinical signatures of this problem, signals predictive of its occurrence (particularly of more frequent, reversible, low-grade injury) and the role of monitoring in prevention by examining several recent examples (for example, troglitazone). In addition, the failure of preclinical toxicology to predict idiosyncratic reactions, and what can be done to improve this problem, is discussed. Finally, our current understanding of the pathophysiology of experimental drug hepatotoxicity is examined, focusing on acetaminophen, particularly with respect to the role of the innate immune system and control of cell-death pathways, which might provide targets for exploration and identification of risk factors and mechanisms in humans.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomed Res Int
                Biomed Res Int
                BMRI
                BioMed Research International
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2314-6133
                2314-6141
                2016
                5 September 2016
                : 2016
                : 9737920
                Affiliations
                1UCB BioPharma SPRL, Chemin du Foriest, R9 Building, 1420 Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium
                2AbbVie, 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA
                3Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
                4Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
                5Drug Safety Consultant, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11, UK
                6Sanofi, Bâtiment C. Bernard, 13 Quai Jules Guesdes, Zone B, BP14, 94403 Vitry-sur-Seine Cedex, France
                7U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
                8Novartis Pharma AG, Klybeckstrasse 141, 4057 Basel, Switzerland
                9Hoffmann La-Roche Inc., 4000 Basel, Switzerland
                10School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Gründenstrasse 40, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland
                11Ipsen Biosciences Inc., 650 E Kendall Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
                12Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France
                13Pfizer R&D, Drug Safety Research and Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA
                14Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
                Author notes
                *Franck A. Atienzar: franck.atienzar@ 123456ucb.com

                Academic Editor: Hwa-Liang Leo

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-3830
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6453-2351
                Article
                10.1155/2016/9737920
                5027328
                5f09d5e7-fc91-4d71-be37-a13da344265f
                Copyright © 2016 Franck A. Atienzar et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 April 2016
                : 22 June 2016
                Categories
                Review Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article