2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Low Dose of Doxorubicin Potentiates the Effect of Temozolomide in Glioblastoma Cells.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy as the main therapeutic strategy. Doxorubicin (DOX) is not used in gliomas due to its low bioavailability in the brain; however, new delivery strategies and low doses may be effective in the long term, especially as part of a drug cocktail. Our aim was to evaluate the chronic effects of low doses of DOX and TMZ in GBM. Human U87-ATCC cells and a primary GBM culture were chronically treated with TMZ (5 μM) and DOX (1 and 10 nM) alone or combined. DOX resulted in a reduction in the number of cells over a period of 35 days and delayed the cell regrowth. In addition, DOX induced cell senescence and reduced tumor sphere formation and the proportion of NANOG- and OCT4-positive cells after 7 days. Low doses of TMZ potentiated the effects of DOX on senescence and sphere formation. This combined response using low doses of DOX may pave the way for its use in glioma therapy, with new technologies to overcome its low blood-brain barrier permeability.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Mol Neurobiol
          Molecular neurobiology
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1559-1182
          0893-7648
          May 2018
          : 55
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Laboratory of Cellular Plasticity and Signaling, Department of Biophysics, Institute of Biosciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
          [2 ] Laboratory of Cellular Plasticity and Signaling, Department of Biophysics, Institute of Biosciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. lenz@ufrgs.br.
          [3 ] Center of Biotechnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. lenz@ufrgs.br.
          [4 ] Departamento de Biofísica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500 Prédio 43431 Lab 115, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91501-970, Brazil. lenz@ufrgs.br.
          [5 ] Laboratory of Cellular Plasticity and Signaling, Department of Biophysics, Institute of Biosciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. plopez@hcpa.edu.br.
          [6 ] Graduate Program in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. plopez@hcpa.edu.br.
          [7 ] Research Center, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, HCPA, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. plopez@hcpa.edu.br.
          [8 ] Centro de Pesquisas Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Largo Eduardo Z. Faraco, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil. plopez@hcpa.edu.br.
          Article
          10.1007/s12035-017-0611-6
          10.1007/s12035-017-0611-6
          28612256
          5e4070b8-1577-4826-868e-06907df4d9cc
          History

          Cancer stem cell,Cell proliferation,Cell senescence,Doxorubicin,Glioblastoma,Temozolomide

          Comments

          Comment on this article