43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice

      review-article
      a , b , c , d , e , f , g , d , a , d , h , a , i , a , i , d , j , d , f , k , g , l , m , a , , for the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group
      Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
      American Society for Microbiology
      Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilms, phages

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, and clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered. Large gaps in knowledge contribute to heterogeneity in approach and lack of consensus in many important clinical areas. The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has convened a panel of experts in phage therapy, clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and pharmacology, who worked with regulatory experts and a funding agency to identify questions based on a clinical framework and divided them into three themes: potential clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, laboratory testing, and pharmacokinetic considerations. Suggestions are provided as answers to a series of questions intended to inform clinicians considering experimental phage therapy for patients in their clinical practices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references202

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug resistant Mycobacterium abscessus

          A 15-year-old cystic fibrosis patient with a disseminated Mycobacterium abscessus infection was treated with a three-phage cocktail following bilateral lung transplantation. Effective lytic phage derivatives that efficiently kill the infectious M. abscessus strain were developed by genome engineering and forward genetics. Intravenous phage treatment was well tolerated and associated with objective clinical improvement including sternal wound closure, improved liver function, and substantial resolution of infected skin nodules.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and Use of Personalized Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutic Cocktails To Treat a Patient with a Disseminated Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection.

            Widespread antibiotic use in clinical medicine and the livestock industry has contributed to the global spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens, including Acinetobacter baumannii We report on a method used to produce a personalized bacteriophage-based therapeutic treatment for a 68-year-old diabetic patient with necrotizing pancreatitis complicated by an MDR A. baumannii infection. Despite multiple antibiotic courses and efforts at percutaneous drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst, the patient deteriorated over a 4-month period. In the absence of effective antibiotics, two laboratories identified nine different bacteriophages with lytic activity for an A. baumannii isolate from the patient. Administration of these bacteriophages intravenously and percutaneously into the abscess cavities was associated with reversal of the patient's downward clinical trajectory, clearance of the A. baumannii infection, and a return to health. The outcome of this case suggests that the methods described here for the production of bacteriophage therapeutics could be applied to similar cases and that more concerted efforts to investigate the use of therapeutic bacteriophages for MDR bacterial infections are warranted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation in chronic otitis due to antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; a preliminary report of efficacy.

              To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation (Biophage-PA) targeting antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic otitis. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial approved by UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) ethical review process. A single specialist university hospital. 24 patients with chronic otitis with a duration of several years (2-58). Each patient had, at the time of entry to the trial, an ear infection because of an antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa strain sensitive to one or more of the six phages present in Biophage-PA. Participants were randomised in two groups of 12 treated with either a single dose of Biophage-PA or placebo and followed up at 7, 21 and 42 days after treatment by the same otologist. Ears were thoroughly cleaned on each occasion and clinical and microbiological indicators measured. Physician assessed erythema/inflammation, ulceration/granulation/polyps, discharge quantity, discharge type and odour using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients reported discomfort, itchiness, wetness and smell also using a VAS. Bacterial levels of P. aeruginosa and phage counts from swabs were measured initially and at follow-up. At each visit patients were asked about side effects using a structured form. Digital otoscopic images were obtained on days 0 and 42 for illustrative purposes only. Relative to day 0, pooled patient- and physician-reported clinical indicators improved for the phage treated group relative to the placebo group. Variation from baseline levels was statistically significant for combined data from all clinic days only for the phage treated group. Variation from baseline levels was statistically significant for the majority of the patient assessed clinical indicators only for the phage treated group. P. aeruginosa counts were significantly lower only in the phage treated group. No treatment related adverse event was reported. The first controlled clinical trial of a therapeutic bacteriophage preparation showed efficacy and safety in chronic otitis because of chemo-resistant P. aeruginosa.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Antimicrob Agents Chemother
                Antimicrob Agents Chemother
                aac
                Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                0066-4804
                1098-6596
                18 January 2022
                15 March 2022
                March 2022
                15 March 2022
                : 66
                : 3
                : e02071-21
                Affiliations
                [a ] Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [b ] Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciencesgrid.413555.3, , Albany, New York, USA
                [c ] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicinegrid.471401.7, , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [d ] National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
                [e ] Advent Health, Orlando, Florida, USA
                [f ] University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
                [g ] Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
                [h ] Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [i ] University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [j ] Baylor College of Medicinegrid.39382.33, , Houston, Texas, USA
                [k ] College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences and School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
                [l ] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillgrid.10698.36, , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [m ] University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
                Author notes

                Gina A. Suh and Thomas P. Lodise contributed equally; author order was decided by consensus during the planning stages of this work

                The authors declare a conflict of interest. Mayo Clinic (Patel, Suh) has a business relationship with Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-6897
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4730-0655
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-6324
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8181-1176
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-1858
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-6015
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2220-0081
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4784-3227
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-0103
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-4141
                Article
                02071-21 aac.02071-21
                10.1128/aac.02071-21
                8923208
                35041506
                5e0235b6-c478-4ffe-a03b-3358738b849d
                Copyright © 2022 Suh et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 215, Pages: 36, Words: 25218
                Funding
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000060;
                Award ID: UM1 AI104681
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000060;
                Award ID: U19 AI157981
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000069;
                Award ID: T32 AR56950
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Minireview
                bacteriophages, Bacteriophages
                Custom metadata
                March 2022

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                staphylococcus aureus,pseudomonas aeruginosa,biofilms,phages
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                staphylococcus aureus, pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilms, phages

                Comments

                Comment on this article