6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The neurobiology of wellness: 1H-MRS correlates of agency, flexibility and neuroaffective reserves in healthy young adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1H-MRS) is a noninvasive imaging technique that measures the concentration of metabolites in defined areas of the human brain in vivo. The underlying structure of natural metabolism-emotion relationships is unknown. Further, there is a wide range of between-person differences in metabolite concentration in healthy individuals, but the significance of this variation for understanding emotion in healthy humans is unclear. Here we investigated the relationship of two emotional constructs, agency and flexibility, with the metabolites glutamate and glutamine (Glx), N-acetylaspartate (tNAA), choline (Cho), creatine (tCr), and myo-inositol (Ins) in the right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) in medically and psychiatrically healthy volunteers ( N = 20, 9 female; mean age = 22.8 years, SD = 3.40). The dACC was selected because this region is an integrative hub involved in multiple brain networks of emotion, cognition and behavior. Emotional traits were assessed using the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire Brief Form (MPQ-BF), an empirically derived self-report instrument with an orthogonal factor structure. Phenotypes evaluated were positive and negative agency (MPQ-BF Social Potency, Aggression), emotional and behavioral flexibility (MPQ-BF Absorption, Control-reversed), and positive and negative affect (MPQ-BF Social Closeness; Stress Reaction, Alienation). The resting concentration of tNAA in the dACC was robustly positively correlated with Absorption ( r = +0.56, unadjusted p = .005), moderately positively correlated with Social Potency ( r = +0.42, unadjusted p = .03), and robustly negatively correlated with Aggression ( r = −0.59, unadjusted p = .003). Absorption and Aggression accounted for substantial variance in tNAA ( R 2 = 0.31, 0.35; combined R 2 = 0.50), and survived correction for multiple comparisons (Holm-Bonferroni adjusted p = .032, 0.021, respectively). dACC Glx and Cho had modest relationships with behavioral flexibility and social affiliation that did not survive this multiple correction, providing effect sizes for future work. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed a three-factor orthogonal solution indicating specific relationships between: 1) Glx and behavioral engagement; 2) Cho and affiliative bonding; and 3) tNAA and a novel dimension that we term neuroaffective reserves. Our results inform the neurobiology of agency and flexibility and lay the groundwork for understanding mechanisms of natural emotion using 1H-MRS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references131

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

          G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A power primer.

            One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Unified segmentation.

              A probabilistic framework is presented that enables image registration, tissue classification, and bias correction to be combined within the same generative model. A derivation of a log-likelihood objective function for the unified model is provided. The model is based on a mixture of Gaussians and is extended to incorporate a smooth intensity variation and nonlinear registration with tissue probability maps. A strategy for optimising the model parameters is described, along with the requisite partial derivatives of the objective function.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9215515
                20498
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                NeuroImage
                1053-8119
                1095-9572
                1 January 2021
                27 October 2020
                15 January 2021
                08 February 2021
                : 225
                : 117509
                Affiliations
                [a ]Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-4, 121 South Main St., Providence, RI 02912, USA
                [b ]Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
                [c ]Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
                [d ]Neuroscience Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
                [e ]Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, and McKnight Brain Research Foundation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
                [f ]Department of Radiology, CAIR Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
                [g ]Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
                [h ]Neuroscience Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
                [i ]Department of Psychiatry, and Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Research Foundation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
                [j ]Center for Neuropsychological Studies, Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
                [k ]Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
                Author notes

                Author contributions

                TLW conceived the basic idea, initiated, designed and directed the study, and wrote the manuscript. TLW, AZN and EGW designed procedures for voxel placement. AZN acquired the majority of the MRS data. ADH and ECP designed and conducted the segmentation analysis for neuroanatomical datasets. EGW, MAM, AW, ECP and TLW conducted the data quality control procedures. EGW, MAM, DGL and TLW performed the statistical and data analyses. TLW and MAG created the working model and graphical abstract. TLW, ECP, AW, ADH, RAC, MAG, DGL, EGW and MAM provided input on data analysis and the interpretation of results. TLW, MAG, ADH, MAM, ECP, DGL, AW, RAC, CBB and EGW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

                [* ]Corresponding author at: Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-5, 121 South Main St., Providence, RI 02912, USA. Tara_White@ 123456Brown.edu (T.L. White).
                Article
                NIHMS1659132
                10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117509
                7869459
                33127477
                5ded28e1-ddfd-46b5-8462-90f84f0f8979

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                trait emotion,personality,single voxel proton magnetic spectroscopy,dorsal anterior cingulate,tnaa,neurotypical adult volunteers

                Comments

                Comment on this article