8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To evaluate and assess the current knowledge about apexification and regenerative techniques as a meaningful treatment modality and to map the scientific evidence for the efficacy of both methods for the management of traumatised immature teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis.

          Methods

          This systematic review searched five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline), and Embase. Published articles written in English were considered for inclusion. The following keywords were used: Regenerative endodontic treatment OR regenerat* OR revital* OR endodontic regeneration OR regenerative endodontics OR pulp revascularization OR revasculari* OR ‘traumatized immature teeth’. Only peer-reviewed studies with a study size of at least 20 cases followed up for 24 months were included. Eligibility assessment was performed independently in a blinded manner by three reviewers and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Subgroup analyses were performed on three clinical outcomes: survival, success, and continued root development.

          Results

          Seven full texts out of 1359 citations were included and conventional content analysis was performed. Most of the identified citations were case reports and case series.

          Conclusions

          In the present systematic review, the qualitative analysis revealed that both regenerative and apexification techniques had equal rates of success and survival and proved to be effective in the treatment of immature necrotic permanent teeth. Endodontic regenerative techniques appear to be superior to apexification techniques in terms of stimulation of root maturation, i.e. root wall thickening and root lengthening. Knowledge gaps were identified regarding the treatment and follow-up protocols for both techniques.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references146

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

          Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

            Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

              The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions. It is important that users can distinguish high quality reviews. Many instruments have been designed to evaluate different aspects of reviews, but there are few comprehensive critical appraisal instruments. AMSTAR was developed to evaluate systematic reviews of randomised trials. In this paper, we report on the updating of AMSTAR and its adaptation to enable more detailed assessment of systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. With moves to base more decisions on real world observational evidence we believe that AMSTAR 2 will assist decision makers in the identification of high quality systematic reviews, including those based on non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alina.wikstrom@sll.se
                Journal
                Eur Arch Paediatr Dent
                Eur Arch Paediatr Dent
                European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1818-6300
                1996-9805
                8 January 2021
                8 January 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 3
                : 311-340
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Division of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Huddinge, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.418651.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 1910, Public Dental Health Services, Department of Endodontics, , Eastmaninstitutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Centre of Paediatric Oral Health, Stockholm, Sweden
                [4 ]GRID grid.418651.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 1910, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Public Dental Health Services, , Eastmaninstitutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]GRID grid.12650.30, ISNI 0000 0001 1034 3451, Department of Endodontics, , Umeå University, ; Umeå, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8281-9241
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-3307
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5840
                Article
                575
                10.1007/s40368-020-00575-1
                8213569
                33420674
                5cd8b8ed-8ad6-4c3d-a317-78ead4d5559c
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 28 April 2020
                : 17 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Karolinska Institute
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2021

                open apices,pulp necrosis,pulp regeneration,regenerative endodontics,immature teeth,children

                Comments

                Comment on this article