26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System to Detect Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Fundus Photographs

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          How does a deep learning system compare with professional human graders in detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy? In this cross-sectional study, the deep learning system showed a sensitivity and specificity of greater than 90% for detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy in a local validation data set, in 3 clinical-based data sets, and in a real-world distribution data set. The deep learning system showed lower sensitivity when tested in multiethnic and website-based data sets. This assessment of fundus images suggests that deep learning systems can provide a tool with high sensitivity and specificity that might expedite screening for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. This cross-sectional study compares the sensitivity and specificity of automated classification of glaucomatous optic neuropathy on retinal fundus images by a deep-learning system with classification by human experts, using Chinese, multiethnic, and website-based data sets. A deep learning system (DLS) that could automatically detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) with high sensitivity and specificity could expedite screening for GON. To establish a DLS for detection of GON using retinal fundus images and glaucoma diagnosis with convoluted neural networks (GD-CNN) that has the ability to be generalized across populations. In this cross-sectional study, a DLS for the classification of GON was developed for automated classification of GON using retinal fundus images obtained from the Chinese Glaucoma Study Alliance, the Handan Eye Study, and online databases. The researchers selected 241 032 images were selected as the training data set. The images were entered into the databases on June 9, 2009, obtained on July 11, 2018, and analyses were performed on December 15, 2018. The generalization of the DLS was tested in several validation data sets, which allowed assessment of the DLS in a clinical setting without exclusions, testing against variable image quality based on fundus photographs obtained from websites, evaluation in a population-based study that reflects a natural distribution of patients with glaucoma within the cohort and an additive data set that has a diverse ethnic distribution. An online learning system was established to transfer the trained and validated DLS to generalize the results with fundus images from new sources. To better understand the DLS decision-making process, a prediction visualization test was performed that identified regions of the fundus images utilized by the DLS for diagnosis. Use of a deep learning system. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity for DLS with reference to professional graders. From a total of 274 413 fundus images initially obtained from CGSA, 269 601 images passed initial image quality review and were graded for GON. A total of 241 032 images (definite GON 29 865 [12.4%], probable GON 11 046 [4.6%], unlikely GON 200 121 [83%]) from 68 013 patients were selected using random sampling to train the GD-CNN model. Validation and evaluation of the GD-CNN model was assessed using the remaining 28 569 images from CGSA. The AUC of the GD-CNN model in primary local validation data sets was 0.996 (95% CI, 0.995-0.998), with sensitivity of 96.2% and specificity of 97.7%. The most common reason for both false-negative and false-positive grading by GD-CNN (51 of 119 [46.3%] and 191 of 588 [32.3%]) and manual grading (50 of 113 [44.2%] and 183 of 538 [34.0%]) was pathologic or high myopia. Application of GD-CNN to fundus images from different settings and varying image quality demonstrated a high sensitivity, specificity, and generalizability for detecting GON. These findings suggest that automated DLS could enhance current screening programs in a cost-effective and time-efficient manner.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Glaucomatous damage of the macula.

          There is a growing body of evidence that early glaucomatous damage involves the macula. The anatomical basis of this damage can be studied using frequency domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT), by which the local thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and local retinal ganglion cell plus inner plexiform (RGC+) layer can be measured. Based upon averaged fdOCT results from healthy controls and patients, we show that: 1. For healthy controls, the average RGC+ layer thickness closely matches human histological data; 2. For glaucoma patients and suspects, the average RGC+ layer shows greater glaucomatous thinning in the inferior retina (superior visual field (VF)); and 3. The central test points of the 6° VF grid (24-2 test pattern) miss the region of greatest RGC+ thinning. Based upon fdOCT results from individual patients, we have learned that: 1. Local RGC+ loss is associated with local VF sensitivity loss as long as the displacement of RGCs from the foveal center is taken into consideration; and 2. Macular damage is typically arcuate in nature and often associated with local RNFL thinning in a narrow region of the disc, which we call the macular vulnerability zone (MVZ). According to our schematic model of macular damage, most of the inferior region of the macula projects to the MVZ, which is located largely in the inferior quadrant of the disc, a region that is particularly susceptible to glaucomatous damage. A small (cecocentral) region of the inferior macula, and all of the superior macula (inferior VF), project to the temporal quadrant, a region that is less susceptible to damage. The overall message is clear; clinicians need to be aware that glaucomatous damage to the macula is common, can occur early in the disease, and can be missed and/or underestimated with standard VF tests that use a 6° grid, such as the 24-2 VF test. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Ophthalmology
                JAMA Ophthalmol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6165
                December 01 2019
                December 01 2019
                : 137
                : 12
                : 1353
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
                [2 ]Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China
                [3 ]School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
                [4 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
                [6 ]Ophthalmology Hospital, First Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
                [7 ]Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
                [8 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
                [9 ]Department of Mathematics, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China
                [10 ]College of Computer Science,Nankai University, Tianjin, China
                [11 ]Beijing Shanggong Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
                [12 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
                [13 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
                [14 ]Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore
                Article
                10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3501
                6743057
                31513266
                5c6b9a5e-0615-42b0-9756-3efebfa091be
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article