2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protection Conferred by COVID-19 Vaccination, Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection, or Hybrid Immunity Against Omicron-Associated Severe Outcomes Among Community-Dwelling Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          We assessed protection from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and/or prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection against Omicron-associated severe outcomes during successive sublineage-predominant periods.

          Methods

          We used a test-negative design to estimate protection by vaccines and/or prior infection against hospitalization/death among community-dwelling, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-tested adults aged ≥50 years in Ontario, Canada, between 2 January 2022 and 30 June 2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the relative change in the odds of hospitalization/death with each vaccine dose (2–5) and/or prior PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (compared with unvaccinated, uninfected subjects) up to 15 months since the last vaccination or infection.

          Results

          We included 18 526 cases with Omicron-associated severe outcomes and 90 778 test-negative controls. Vaccine protection was high during BA.1/BA.2 predominance but was generally <50% during periods of BA.4/BA.5 and BQ/XBB predominance without boosters. A third/fourth dose transiently increased protection during BA.4/BA.5 predominance ( third-dose, 6-month: 68%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 63%–72%; fourth-dose, 6-month: 80%, 95% CI 77%–83%) but was lower and waned quickly during BQ/XBB predominance ( third-dose, 6-month: 59%, 95% CI 48%–67%; 12-month: 49%, 95% CI 41%–56%; fourth-dose, 6-month: 62%, 95% CI 56%–68%, 12-months: 51%, 95% CI 41%–56%). Hybrid immunity conferred nearly 90% protection throughout BA.1/BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 predominance but was reduced during BQ/XBB predominance ( third-dose, 6-month: 60%, 95% CI 36%–75%; fourth-dose, 6-month: 63%, 95% CI 42%–76%). Protection was restored with a fifth dose (bivalent; 6-month: 91%, 95% CI 79%–96%). Prior infection alone did not confer lasting protection.

          Conclusions

          Protection from COVID-19 vaccines and/or prior SARS-CoV-2 infections against severe outcomes is reduced when immune-evasive variants/subvariants emerge and may also wane over time. Our findings support a variant-adapted booster vaccination strategy with periodic review.

          Abstract

          Protection from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, prior COVID-19 infections or hybrid immunity against severe outcomes is reduced when immune-evasive variants/subvariants emerge and may also wane over time. Our findings support a variant-adapted booster vaccination strategy with periodic review.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Alarming antibody evasion properties of rising SARS-CoV-2 BQ and XBB subvariants

          The BQ and XBB subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron are now rapidly expanding, possibly due to altered antibody evasion properties deriving from their additional spike mutations. Here, we report that neutralization of BQ.1, BQ.1.1, XBB, and XBB.1 by sera from vaccinees and infected persons was markedly impaired, including sera from individuals boosted with a WA1/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine. Titers against BQ and XBB subvariants were lower by 13-81-fold and 66-155-fold, respectively, far beyond what had been observed to date. Monoclonal antibodies capable of neutralizing the original Omicron variant were largely inactive against these new subvariants, and the responsible individual spike mutations were identified. These subvariants were found to have similar ACE2-binding affinities as their predecessors. Together, our findings indicate that BQ and XBB subvariants present serious threats to current COVID-19 vaccines, render inactive all authorized antibodies, and may have gained dominance in the population because of their advantage in evading antibodies. Recent BQ and XBB subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 demonstrate dramatically increased ability to evade neutralizing antibodies, even those from people who received the bivalent mRNA booster or who are immunized and had previous breakthrough Omicron infection. Additionally, both BQ and XBB are completely resistant to bebtelovimab, meaning there are now no clinically authorized therapeutic antibodies effective against these circulating variants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omicron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression

            Background The global surge in the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant has resulted in many individuals with hybrid immunity (immunity developed through a combination of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination). We aimed to systematically review the magnitude and duration of the protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against infection and severe disease caused by the omicron variant. Methods For this systematic review and meta-regression, we searched for cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov , the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the WHO COVID-19 database, and Europe PubMed Central from Jan 1, 2020, to June 1, 2022, using keywords related to SARS-CoV-2, reinfection, protective effectiveness, previous infection, presence of antibodies, and hybrid immunity. The main outcomes were the protective effectiveness against reinfection and against hospital admission or severe disease of hybrid immunity, hybrid immunity relative to previous infection alone, hybrid immunity relative to previous vaccination alone, and hybrid immunity relative to hybrid immunity with fewer vaccine doses. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions Tool. We used log-odds random-effects meta-regression to estimate the magnitude of protection at 1-month intervals. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022318605). Findings 11 studies reporting the protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and 15 studies reporting the protective effectiveness of hybrid immunity were included. For previous infection, there were 97 estimates (27 with a moderate risk of bias and 70 with a serious risk of bias). The effectiveness of previous infection against hospital admission or severe disease was 74·6% (95% CI 63·1–83·5) at 12 months. The effectiveness of previous infection against reinfection waned to 24·7% (95% CI 16·4–35·5) at 12 months. For hybrid immunity, there were 153 estimates (78 with a moderate risk of bias and 75 with a serious risk of bias). The effectiveness of hybrid immunity against hospital admission or severe disease was 97·4% (95% CI 91·4–99·2) at 12 months with primary series vaccination and 95·3% (81·9–98·9) at 6 months with the first booster vaccination after the most recent infection or vaccination. Against reinfection, the effectiveness of hybrid immunity following primary series vaccination waned to 41·8% (95% CI 31·5–52·8) at 12 months, while the effectiveness of hybrid immunity following first booster vaccination waned to 46·5% (36·0–57·3) at 6 months. Interpretation All estimates of protection waned within months against reinfection but remained high and sustained for hospital admission or severe disease. Individuals with hybrid immunity had the highest magnitude and durability of protection, and as a result might be able to extend the period before booster vaccinations are needed compared to individuals who have never been infected. Funding WHO COVID-19 Solidarity Response Fund and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Estimated Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Omicron or Delta Symptomatic Infection and Severe Outcomes

              This case-control study estimates the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic infections due to the Delta and Omicron variants and severe outcomes associated with these infections among adults in Ontario, Canada. Question What is the estimated effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for preventing symptomatic infections due to the Omicron and Delta variants and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) associated with these infections? Findings In this test-negative case-control study of 134 435 adults in Ontario, Canada, the estimated effectiveness of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine was high against symptomatic Delta infection and severe outcomes and was lower against symptomatic Omicron infection. After a third dose, estimated vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was 61% for symptomatic infection and 95% for severe outcomes. Meaning The findings suggest that 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine may protect against symptomatic Omicron infection and severe outcomes, but other measures are also likely needed to prevent Omicron infection. Importance The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including among individuals who have received 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, increased substantially following the emergence of the Omicron variant in Ontario, Canada. Understanding the estimated effectiveness of 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine against outcomes associated with Omicron and Delta infections may aid decision-making at the individual and population levels. Objective To estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic infections due to the Omicron and Delta variants and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) associated with these infections. Design, Setting, and Participants This test-negative case-control study used linked provincial databases for SARS-CoV-2 laboratory testing, reportable disease, COVID-19 vaccination, and health administration in Ontario, Canada. Participants were individuals aged 18 years or older who had COVID-19 symptoms or severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between December 6 and 26, 2021. Exposures Receipt of 2 or 3 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and time since last dose. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were symptomatic Omicron or Delta infection and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) associated with infection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effectiveness of 2 or 3 COVID-19 vaccine doses by time since the latest dose compared with no vaccination. Estimated VE was calculated using the formula VE = (1 – [adjusted odds ratio]) × 100%. Results Of 134 435 total participants, 16 087 were Omicron-positive cases (mean [SD] age, 36.0 [14.1] years; 8249 [51.3%] female), 4261 were Delta-positive cases (mean [SD] age, 44.2 [16.8] years; 2199 [51.6%] female), and 114 087 were test-negative controls (mean [SD] age, 42.0 [16.5] years; 67 884 [59.5%] female). Estimated VE against symptomatic Delta infection decreased from 89% (95% CI, 86%-92%) 7 to 59 days after a second dose to 80% (95% CI, 74%-84%) after 240 or more days but increased to 97% (95% CI, 96%-98%) 7 or more days after a third dose. Estimated VE against symptomatic Omicron infection was 36% (95% CI, 24%-45%) 7 to 59 days after a second dose and 1% (95% CI, –8% to 10%) after 180 days or longer, but 7 or more days after a third dose, it increased to 61% (95% CI, 56%-65%). Estimated VE against severe outcomes was high 7 or more days after a third dose for both Delta (99%; 95% CI, 98%-99%) and Omicron (95%; 95% CI, 87%-98%). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, in contrast to high estimated VE against symptomatic Delta infection and severe outcomes after 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, estimated VE was modest and short term against symptomatic Omicron infection but better maintained against severe outcomes. A third dose was associated with improved estimated VE against symptomatic infection and with high estimated VE against severe outcomes for both variants. Preventing infection due to Omicron and potential future variants may require tools beyond the currently available vaccines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : on behalf of the Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Provincial Collaborative Network (PCN) investigators
                Journal
                Clin Infect Dis
                Clin Infect Dis
                cid
                Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                15 May 2024
                24 November 2023
                24 November 2023
                : 78
                : 5
                : 1372-1382
                Affiliations
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Public Health Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Public Health Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Public Health Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                British Columbia Children's Hospital , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Public Health Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Women's College Hospital , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                Bruyere Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Public Health Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                ICES , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Public Health Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                University Health Network , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence: J. C. Kwong, ICES, V1 06, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada ( jeff.kwong@ 123456utoronto.ca or @DrJeffKwong).

                Potential conflicts of interest. N. L. has previously received honoraria for consultancy work, speaking in educational programs, and/or travel support from: Shionogi Inc., Gilead Sciences Canada Inc., Janssen Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc., Sanofi Pasteur Ltd., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Genentech Inc., CIDARA Therapeutics Inc., Clarion Healthcare, bioStrategies, Technospert, Aligos; all unrelated to this work. K. W. is a shareholder and board member and Co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer of CANImmunize Inc. and has served on independent scientific advisory boards for Medicago (Independent Data Monitoring Committee) and Moderna (Global Advisory Core Consultancy Group). J. G. reports a position as a paid consultant scientific editor for GIDEON Informatics, Inc., which is unrelated to the current work. S. E. W. reports being a co-investigator on a grant related to public health surveillance of invasive pneumococcal disease (no involvement in administration of funds) for the Canadian Immunization Research Network and a co-investigator on a grant on immunization data in Canada (no involvement in administration of funds) for CIRN; travel support to attend the Future of Vaccinology conference in October 2023 as an invited speaker from McMaster University (Hamilton, ON) and a role as an unpaid volunteer member for Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI). All other authors report no potential conflicts.

                All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-6607
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-233X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-8974
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9793-113X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-2046
                Article
                ciad716
                10.1093/cid/ciad716
                11093681
                38001037
                5b2cbd8a-44e2-42a4-bed8-d9e1712ac09d
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 21 August 2023
                : 15 November 2023
                : 04 January 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Categories
                Major Article
                Vaccine
                AcademicSubjects/MED00290

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                covid-19 vaccination,hybrid immunity,omicron,severe outcomes,adults

                Comments

                Comment on this article