6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Could Not Improve Cumulative Live Birth Rate Among 705 Couples with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We evaluate whether next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the cumulative pregnancy outcomes of patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) as compared to conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

          Patients and Methods

          This was a retrospective cohort study (2015–2022). A total of 705 couples diagnosed with uRIF were included in the study. 229 women transferred blastocysts based on morphological grading (IVF/ICSI) and 476 couples opted for PGT-A to screen blastocysts by NGS. Women were further stratified according to age at retrieval (<38 years and ≥38 years). The primary outcome was the cumulative live-birth rate after all the embryos were transferred in a single oocyte retrieval or until achieving a live birth. Confounders were adjusted using binary logistic regression models.

          Results

          Cumulative live-birth rate was similar between the IVF/ICSI group and the PGT-A group after stratified by age: IVF/ICSI vs PGT-A in the <38 years subgroup (49.7% vs 57.7%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (0.84–1.84), P = 0.270) and in the ≥38 years subgroup (14.0% vs 19.5%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.41–2.92), P = 0.866), respectively. Nonetheless, the PGT group had a lower first-time biochemical pregnancy loss rate (17.0% vs 8.7%, P = 0.034) and a higher cumulative good birth outcome rate (35.2% vs 46.4%, P = 0.014) than the IVF/ICSI group in the <38 years subgroup. Other pregnancy outcomes after the initial embryo transfer and multiple transfers following a single oocyte retrieval were all similar between groups.

          Conclusion

          Our results showed no evidence of favorable effects of PGT-A treatment on improving the cumulative live birth rate in uRIF couples regardless of maternal age. Use of PGT-A in the <38 years uRIF patients would help to decrease the first-time biochemical pregnancy loss and increase the cumulative good birth outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

          To determine the relationship between the age of the female partner and the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy. Retrospective. Academic. Trophectoderm biopsies. Comprehensive chromosomal screening performed on patients with blastocysts available for biopsy. Evaluation of the impact of maternal age on the prevalence of aneuploidy, the probability of having no euploid embryos within a cohort, the complexity of aneuploidy as gauged by the number of aneuploid chromosomes, and the trisomy/monosomy ratio. Aneuploidy increased predictably after 26 years of age. A slightly increased prevalence was noted at younger ages, with >40% aneuploidy in women 23 years and under. The no euploid embryo rate was lowest (2% to 6%) in women aged 26 to 37, was 33% at age 42, and was 53% at age 44. Among the biopsies with aneuploidy, 64% involved a single chromosome, 20% two chromosomes, and 16% three chromosomes, with the proportion of more complex aneuploidy increasing with age. Finally, the trisomy/monosomy ratio approximated 1 and increased minimally with age. The lowest risk for embryonic aneuploidy was between ages 26 and 30. Both younger and older age groups had higher rates of aneuploidy and an increased risk for more complex aneuploidies. The overall risk did not measurably change after age 43. Trisomies and monosomies are equally prevalent. Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

            Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) has been increasingly advocated, but concerns about the lower pregnancy rate after reducing the number of embryos transferred have encouraged transfer of multiple embryos. Extended embryo culture combined with electively freezing all embryos and undertaking a deferred frozen embryo transfer might increase pregnancy rate after eSET. We aimed to establish whether elective frozen single blastocyst transfer improved singleton livebirth rate compared with fresh single blastocyst transfer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women

              Elective frozen-embryo transfer has been shown to result in a higher live-birth rate than fresh-embryo transfer among anovulatory women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. It is uncertain whether frozen-embryo transfer increases live-birth rates among ovulatory women with infertility.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Appl Clin Genet
                Appl Clin Genet
                tacg
                The Application of Clinical Genetics
                Dove
                1178-704X
                01 February 2024
                2024
                : 17
                : 1-13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine , Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health , Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
                [5 ]Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health , Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
                [6 ]National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Tianxiang Ni; Junhao Yan, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University , Jinan, People’s Republic of China, Tel +0531-85651172, Email tianxiangni907@163.com; yyy306@126.com
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                441784
                10.2147/TACG.S441784
                10840415
                38322806
                5b25b31e-867b-46a2-b026-334f5aeec453
                © 2024 Liu et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 19 October 2023
                : 19 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, References: 34, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Original Research

                preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy,unexplained recurrent implantation failure,cumulative live-birth rate,cumulative good birth outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article