The optimal ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter with negative-pressure ureteral access sheath: an in vitro research

Shi, Jingyu; Huang, Ting; Song, Baiyang; Liu, Wanzhang; Cheng, Yue; Fang, Li Gang

doi:10.1007/s00345-024-04815-7

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

The optimal ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter with negative-pressure ureteral access sheath: an in vitro research

Author(s): Jingyu Shi , Ting Huang , Baiyang Song , Wanzhang Liu , Yue Cheng , Li Fang

Publication date Created: December 2024

Publication date (Electronic): March 07 2024

Journal: World Journal of Urology

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Most cited references 18

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology.

Theodoros Tokas, Thomas Herrmann, Andreas Skolarikos … (2019)

To perform a review on the latest evidence related to normal and pathological intrarenal pressures (IRPs), complications of incremented values, and IRP ranges during endourology.

0 comments Cited 70 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview

Vincent De Coninck, Etienne Xavier Keller, Bhaskar Somani … (2020)

The aim of this paper was to give a complete overview of all published complications associated with ureteroscopy and their according management and prevention in current urological practice.

0 comments Cited 45 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones.

Zewu Zhu, Yu. Cui, Feng Zeng … (2019)

To compare the efficiency and safety of suctioning ureteral access sheath (UAS) and traditional UAS during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for treatment of renal stones.

0 comments Cited 37 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Li Fang: (View ORCID Profile)

Journal

Title: World Journal of Urology

Abbreviated Title: World J Urol

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

ISSN (Electronic): 1433-8726

Publication date Created: December 2024

Publication date (Electronic): March 07 2024

Volume: 42

Issue: 1

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04815-7

PubMed ID: 38453696

SO-VID: 5a32298e-a66b-43ad-bcd8-01b5ef56365b

License:

https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.