18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      qSOFA as a predictor of ICU outcomes in a resource-limited setting in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in critical care patients. Developing tools to identify patients who are at risk of poor outcomes and prolonged length of stay in intensive care units (ICUs) is critical, particularly in resource-limited settings.

          Objectives

          To determine whether the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score based on bedside assessment alone was a promising tool for risk prediction in low-resource settings.

          Methods

          A retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Edendale Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (SA), was recruited into the study between 2014 and 2018. The association of qSOFA with in-ICU mortality was measured using multivariable logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the additive contribution to a baseline model using likelihood ratio testing.

          Results

          The qSOFA scores of 0, 1 and 2 were not associated with increased odds of in-ICU mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 - 1.79; p=0.26) in patients with infection, while the qSOFA of 3 was associated with in-ICU mortality in infected patients (aOR 2.82; 95% CI 1.91 - 4.16; p<0.001). On the other hand, the qSOFA scores of 2 (aOR 3.25; 95% CI 1.91 - 5.53; p<0.001) and 3 (aOR 6.26, 95% CI 0.38 - 11.62, p<0.001) were associated with increased odds of in-ICU mortality in patients without infection. Discrimination for mortality was fair to poor and adding qSOFA to a baseline model yielded a statistical improvement in both cases ( p<0.001).

          Conclusion

          qSOFA was associated with, but weakly discriminant, for in-ICU mortality for patients with and without infection in a resource-limited, public hospital in SA. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that support the use of qSOFA to deliver low-cost, high-value critical care in resource-limited settings

          Contributions of the study

          This study expanded the data supporting the use of qSOFA in resource-limited settings beyond the emergency department or ward to include patients admitted to the ICU. Additionally, this study demonstrated stronger predictive abilities in a population of patients admitted with trauma without suspected or confirmed infection, thus providing an additional use of qSOFA as a risk-prediction tool for a broader population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

          Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

            The Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force defined sepsis as "life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection." The performance of clinical criteria for this sepsis definition is unknown.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

              Septic shock currently refers to a state of acute circulatory failure associated with infection. Emerging biological insights and reported variation in epidemiology challenge the validity of this definition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                South Afr J Crit Care
                South Afr J Crit Care
                SAJCC
                PMCID
                Southern African Journal of Critical Care
                South African Medical Association (Pretoria, South Africa )
                1562-8264
                2078-676X
                01 December 2020
                2020
                : 36
                : 2
                : 10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.433
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
                [2 ] Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
                [3 ] Discipline of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
                [4 ] Discipline of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
                [5 ] Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
                [6 ] Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
                [7 ] Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: S M Savarimuthu - sella.savarimuthu@ 123456pennmedicine.upenn.edu

                Declaration: None.

                Author Contributions: Equal contributions.

                Funding: This project was supported by grant number K12HS026372 (GLA) from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

                Conflicts of interest: None.

                Article
                10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.433
                9045512
                59908682-27c2-43a1-a5a7-278911c8a5d7
                Copyright @ 2020

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 July 2020
                Categories
                Research

                sepsis,quick sequential organ failure assessment score (qsofa),resource-limited setting,low- and middle-income countries (lmic),global critical care

                Comments

                Comment on this article