Consensus on Outcome Measures for Glaucoma Effectiveness Trials: Results From a Delphi and Nominal Group Technique Approaches.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Comparing the relative effectiveness of interventions across glaucoma trials can be problematic due to differences in definitions of outcomes. We sought to identify a key set of clinical outcomes and reach consensus on how best to measure them from the perspective of glaucoma experts.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J. Glaucoma

Title: Journal of glaucoma

Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

ISSN (Electronic): 1536-481X

ISSN (Print): 1057-0829

Publication date (Electronic): June 2016

Volume: 25

Issue: 6

Affiliations

[1 ] *Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen †Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen ‡Institute of Clinical Science, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Article

DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000301

PubMed ID: 26091178

SO-VID: 5890af5e-fe32-46c0-b148-b2cc6c17a7ab

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 15

See all cited by