3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of organization decision making styles and safety accountability on occupational health and safety implementation: The moderating role of mimetic motives

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The agriculture sector is a traditional economic pillar of many emerging economies. However, it is facing greater occupational health and safety (OHS) challenges in Pakistan, and its performance is continuously decreasing. An effective OHS implementation provides better control over OHS challenges and may help to restore its former glory. Therefore, this study aims to explore different organizational decision-making styles and safety accountability to put OHS into practice in this sector. Based on institutional theory, a theoretical framework was developed. Two hundred and eighty-seven agriculture farms in Punjab, Pakistan were surveyed and analyzed using SmartPLS 3.3.7. The findings revealed that implementation styles (rational and incremental) and safety accountability positively impact OHS implementation. Similarly, the moderating role of mimetic motives was found positively significant in the relationship between rational style and OHS implementation, and negatively significant in the relationship between incremental style and OHS implementation. While no moderating effect of mimetic motive was found between safety accountability and OHS implementation. This study suggested that OHS implementation should not be viewed as a social or technical issue alone. Strategic arrangements should be made at the organizational level to gain better control over OHS challenges by considering the institutional environment in which the organization operates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

            Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                14 November 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 1004767
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia , Penang, Malaysia
                [2] 2Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah , Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, Universidad Central de Chile, Chile

                Reviewed by: Naeem Hayat, Kota Bahru, Malaysia; Joseph Odhiambo Onyango, Strathmore University, Kenya; Suchismita Satapathy, KIIT University, India

                *Correspondence: Lilis Surienty lilis@ 123456usm.my

                This article was submitted to Occupational Health and Safety, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2022.1004767
                9702562
                36452948
                5862f45c-3567-4a9a-98c8-719252432f23
                Copyright © 2022 Nadeem, Surienty and Haque.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 July 2022
                : 17 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 13, Words: 8505
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                occupational health and safety implementation,safety accountability,organizational decision-making styles,agriculture,mimetic motives

                Comments

                Comment on this article