13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of running intensity on intestinal permeability

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Journal of Applied Physiology
      American Physiological Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pals, Kay L., Ray-Tai Chang, Alan J. Ryan, and Carl V. Gisolfi. Effect of running intensity on intestinal permeability. J. Appl. Physiol. 82(2): 571–576, 1997.—Enhanced intestinal permeability has been associated with gastrointestinal disorders in long-distance runners. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of running intensity on small intestinal permeability by using the lactulose and rhamnose differential urinary excretion test. Secondary purposes included assessing the relationship between small intestinal permeability and gastrointestinal symptoms and evaluating gastric damage by using sucrose as a probe. Six healthy volunteers [5 men, 1 woman; age = 30 ± 2 yr; peak O 2 uptake (V˙o 2 peak) = 57.7 ± 2.1 ml ⋅ kg −1 ⋅ min −1] rested or performed treadmill exercise at 40, 60, or 80%V˙o 2 peakfor 60 min in a moderate environment (22°C, 50% relative humidity). At 30 min into rest or exercise, the permeability test solution (5 g sucrose, 5 g lactulose, 2 g rhamnose in 50 ml water; ∼800 mosM) was ingested. Urinary excretion rates (6 h) of the lactulose-to-rhamnose ratio were used to assess small intestinal permeability, and concentrations of each probe were determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Running at 80%V˙o 2 peakincreased ( P < 0.05) small intestinal permeability compared with rest, 40, and 60%V˙o 2 peakwith mean values expressed as percent recovery of ingested dose of 0.107 ± 0.021 (SE), 0.048 ± 0.009, 0.056 ± 0.005, and 0.064 ± 0.010%, respectively. Increases in small intestinal permeability did not result in a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms, and urinary recovery of sucrose did not reflect increased gastric permeability. The significance and mechanisms involved in increased small intestinal permeability after high-intensity running merit further investigation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intestinal permeability: an overview.

            The noninvasive assessment of intestinal permeability in humans has a 20-year history. Because the tests are increasingly used in clinical practice and research and because there is much controversy, we reviewed the literature and outlined the potential and possible shortcomings of these procedures. Data was obtained from personal files and from a systemic search through MEDLINE and EMBASE. The principle of the differential urinary excretion of orally administered test markers is explained with reference to the desired physicochemical properties of the markers and how the principle can be exploited to allow assessment of various other gastrointestinal functions. The use of intestinal permeability tests for diagnostic screen for small bowel disease and assessment of responses to treatment, the pathogenesis of disease, normal intestinal physiology, and the effect of drugs and toxins on the intestine is described and reviewed. The controversy surrounding the anatomic location of the permeation pathways that the markers use is highlighted. Noninvasive tests of intestinal permeability have fulfilled early promises of usefulness in clinical practice and research. There is now a need for integrated research into the basic mechanisms of regulatory control of the intestinal barrier function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Structure, biochemistry, and assembly of epithelial tight junctions.

              B Gumbiner (1987)
              The zonula occludens (ZO), also referred to as the tight junction, forms the barrier to the diffusion of molecules and ions across the epithelial cell layer through the paracellular space. The level of electrical resistance of the paracellular pathway seems to depend on the number of strands in the ZO observed by freeze-fracture electron microscopy (EM). The ZO also forms the boundary between the compositionally distinct apical and basolateral plasma membrane domains because it is a barrier to the lateral diffusion of lipids and membrane proteins that reside in the extracytoplasmic leaflet of the membrane bilayer. In contrast to its appearance in transmission EM, the tight junction is not a fusion between the outer membrane leaflets of neighboring cells. Rather it consists of protein molecules, including the newly discovered protein ZO-1 and probably others, which bring the plasma membranes into extremely close apposition so as to occlude the extracellular space. Very little is known about the assembly of tight junctions, but several kinds of evidence suggest that they are very dynamic structures. Other elements of the epithelial junctional complex including the zonula adherens (ZA), the Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin, or L-CAM, and actin filaments of the cytoskeleton may participate in the assembly of the ZO.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Applied Physiology
                Journal of Applied Physiology
                American Physiological Society
                8750-7587
                1522-1601
                February 01 1997
                February 01 1997
                : 82
                : 2
                : 571-576
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Exercise Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1111
                Article
                10.1152/jappl.1997.82.2.571
                9049739
                57bf044c-d273-4fb9-8c56-681ffeeb882b
                © 1997
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article