24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Gastrointestinal Complaints During Exercise: Prevalence, Etiology, and Nutritional Recommendations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gastrointestinal problems are common, especially in endurance athletes, and often impair performance or subsequent recovery. Generally, studies suggest that 30–50 % of athletes experience such complaints. Most gastrointestinal symptoms during exercise are mild and of no risk to health, but hemorrhagic gastritis, hematochezia, and ischemic bowel can present serious medical challenges. Three main causes of gastrointestinal symptoms have been identified, and these are either physiological, mechanical, or nutritional in nature. During intense exercise, and especially when hypohydrated, mesenteric blood flow is reduced; this is believed to be one of the main contributors to the development of gastrointestinal symptoms. Reduced splanchnic perfusion could result in compromised gut permeability in athletes. However, although evidence exists that this might occur, this has not yet been definitively linked to the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Nutritional training and appropriate nutrition choices can reduce the risk of gastrointestinal discomfort during exercise by ensuring rapid gastric emptying and the absorption of water and nutrients, and by maintaining adequate perfusion of the splanchnic vasculature. A number of nutritional manipulations have been proposed to minimize gastrointestinal symptoms, including the use of multiple transportable carbohydrates, and potentially the use of nutrients that stimulate the production of nitric oxide in the intestine and thereby improve splanchnic perfusion. However, at this stage, evidence for beneficial effects of such interventions is lacking, and more research needs to be conducted to obtain a better understanding of the etiology of the problems and to improve the recommendations to athletes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of running intensity on intestinal permeability.

          Enhanced intestinal permeability has been associated with gastrointestinal disorders in long-distance runners. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of running intensity on small intestinal permeability by using the lactulose and rhamnose differential urinary excretion test. Secondary purposes included assessing the relationship between small intestinal permeability and gastrointestinal symptoms and evaluating gastric damage by using sucrose as a probe. Six healthy volunteers [5 men, 1 woman; age = 30 +/- 2 yr; peak O2 uptake (VO2peak) = 57.7 +/- 2.1 ml.kg-1.min-1] rested or performed treadmill exercise at 40, 60, or 80% VO2peak for 60 min in a moderate environment (22 degrees C, 50% relative humidity). At 30 min into rest or exercise, the permeability test solution (5 g sucrose, 5 g lactulose, 2 g rhamnose in 50 ml water, approximately 800 mosM) was ingested. Urinary excretion rates (6 h) of the lactulose-to-rhamnose ratio were used to assess small intestinal permeability, and concentrations of each probe were determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Running at 80% VO2peak increased (P < 0.05) small intestinal permeability compared with rest, 40, and 60% VO2peak with mean values expressed as percent recovery of ingested dose of 0.107 +/- 0.021 (SE), 0.048 +/- 0.009, 0.056 +/- 0.005, and 0.064 +/- 0.010%, respectively. Increases in small intestinal permeability did not result in a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms, and urinary recovery of sucrose did not reflect increased gastric permeability. The significance and mechanisms involved in increased small intestinal permeability after high-intensity running merit further investigation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factors related to successful completion of a 161-km ultramarathon.

            Despite increased 161-km ultramarathon participation in recent years, little is known about those who pursue such an activity. This study surveyed entrants in two of the largest 161-km trail ultramarathon runs in North America to explore demographic characteristics and issues that affected race performance. All entries of the 2009 Western States Endurance Run and the Vermont 100 Endurance Race were invited to complete a postrace questionnaire. There were 500 respondents among the 701 race entries (71.3% response). Finish time was found to have a significant (P ≤ .01) negative association with training volume and was generally directly associated with body mass index. Among nonfinishers, the primary reason for dropping out was nausea and/or vomiting (23.0%). Finishers compared with nonfinishers were more likely (P ≤ .02) to report blisters (40.1% vs 17.3%), muscle pain (36.5% vs 20.1%), and exhaustion (23.1% vs 13.7%) as adversely affecting race performance, but nausea and/or vomiting was similar between groups (36.8% vs 39.6%). Nausea and/or vomiting was no more common among those using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), those participating in the event with higher ambient temperatures, those with a lower training volume, or those with less experience at finishing 161-km races. Overall use of NSAIDs was high, and greater (P = .006) among finishers (60.5%) than nonfinishers (46.4%). From this study, we conclude that primary performance-limiting issues in 161-km ultramarathons include nausea and/or vomiting, blisters, and muscle pain, and there is a disturbingly high use of NSAIDs in these events.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A meta-analysis.

              To describe the relative risk for serious gastrointestinal complications due to non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) exposure among NSAID users as well as in selected subgroups. Overview and meta-analysis. A literature search of English-language studies examining the association between NSAIDs and adverse gastrointestinal events for the period 1975 to 1990 identified using MEDLINE and communicating with three internationally recognized experts. A qualitative summary of study characteristics and a critical appraisal of study quality were done. The results of 16 primary studies were selected and combined statistically. Summary estimates were weighted by sample size and quality score. The overall odds ratio of the risk for adverse gastrointestinal events related to NSAID use, summarized from 16 studies (9 case-control and 7 cohort) was 2.74 (95% Cl, 2.54 to 2.97). The summary odds ratios were as follows: elderly patients, (aged greater than or equal to 60 years), 5.52 (Cl, 4.63 to 6.60); patients under 65 years of age, 1.65 (Cl, 1.08 to 2.53); women, 2.32 (Cl, 1.91 to 2.82); and men, 2.40 (Cl, 1.85 to 3.11). The summary odds ratio for NSAID users receiving concomitant corticosteroids compared with NSAID users not receiving corticosteroids was 1.83 (Cl, 1.20 to 2.78). The summary odds ratio for the first gastrointestinal event was 2.39 (Cl, 2.16 to 2.65). The relative risk for a subsequent or unspecified gastrointestinal event was 4.76 (Cl, 4.05 to 5.59). The summary odds ratio for less than 1 month of NSAID exposure was 8.00 (Cl, 6.37 to 10.06); for more than 1 month but less than 3 months of exposure, the summary odds ratio was 3.31 (Cl, 2.27 to 4.82); and for more than 3 months of exposure, the summary odds ratio was 1.92 (Cl, 1.19 to 3.13). Users of NSAIDs are at approximately three times greater relative risk for developing serious adverse gastrointestinal events than are nonusers. Additional risk factors include age greater than 60 years, previous history of gastrointestinal events, and concomitant corticosteroid use. Another possible risk factor is the first 3 months of NSAID therapy. The risk for serious gastrointestinal events appears to be equal among men and women. These data represent summary statistics from 16 studies and cannot be considered generalizable to all NSAID users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                erick_po@yahoo.com.br
                Journal
                Sports Med
                Sports Med
                Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.)
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0112-1642
                1179-2035
                3 May 2014
                3 May 2014
                2014
                : 44
                : 79-85
                Affiliations
                [ ]School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Av. Pará, no 1720 Bloco 2U, Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais 38400-902 Brazil
                [ ]Centre for Physical Exercise and Nutrition Metabolism, UNESP School of Medicine, Public Health Department, Botucatu, São Paulo Brazil
                [ ]Gatorade Sports Science Institute, Barrington, IL USA
                [ ]School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
                Article
                153
                10.1007/s40279-014-0153-2
                4008808
                24791919
                4f7c7059-ce13-4fc5-af53-f37a0a514c20
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

                Comments

                Comment on this article