Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

A biomechanical comparison between the intact C2-C7 segments and the C5-C6 segments implanted with two different constrained types (fixed and mobile core) of artificial disc replacement (ADR) using a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element (FE) model.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Spine

Title: Spine

Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

ISSN (Electronic): 1528-1159

ISSN (Print): 0362-2436

Publication date (Electronic): Apr 20 2011

Volume: 36

Issue: 9

Affiliations

[1 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Article

DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5cb87

PubMed ID: 21245792

SO-VID: 5783123a-0bde-42c1-9bf8-49febbbfdf3b

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Cited by 38

See all cited by