7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Drug Use and Type of Adverse Drug Events–Identified by a Trigger Tool in Different Units in a Swedish Pediatric Hospital

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The objectives of our study were to determine drug use, type and incidence of all adverse event associated with drug or drug-related processes (Adverse Drug Events, ADE) among pediatric inpatients in relation to hospital unit and length of stay.

          Patients and Methods

          600 pediatric (0–18 years) admissions at a Swedish university hospital during one year were included and stratified in blocks to 150 neonatal, surgical/orthopedic, medicine and emergency-medicine unit admissions, respectively. Adverse events were identified from medical records using a pediatric trigger tool. All triggers identifying an adverse event related to drugs and drug-related devices were included. Data on drug use were extracted from the hospital drug-data warehouse.

          Results

          In total, 17794 daily drug orders were administrated to 486 (81.0% exposed) admissions. Parental nutrition, potassium salts and morphine constituted half of all high-risk drugs prescribed. Two-thirds of intravenous irritating drug doses consisted of vancomycin, esomeprazole and meropenem. In 129 (21.5%) admissions, at least one ADE was identified, out of which 21 ADE were classified as more severe (National Coordinating Council Medication Error Reporting Prevention-Index, NCCMERP≥F). The ADE incidence was 47.4 (95% confidence interval: 39.4–57.3) per 1000 admission days and varied by unit category. In neonatal units, 56.9 (49.5–65.4) ADEs/1000 admission days were detected, in surgery/orthopedic 54.2 (40.3–72.8), in medicine 44.1 (33.1–58.7), and in emergency-medicine 14.3 (7.7–26.7) ADEs/1000 admission days were found. The most common types of ADEs were identified by triggers that were not directly aiming at drugs including insufficiently treated pain (incidence peaking already in the first days), skin, tissue or vascular harm (peaking at the end of the first week) and hospital-acquired infections (peaking in later admission days).

          Conclusion

          Adverse drug events are common in pediatric patients. The incidence of ADEs and type of ADE varies by hospital unit and length of hospital stay.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.

          Iatrogenic injuries, including medication errors, are an important problem in all hospitalized populations. However, few epidemiological data are available regarding medication errors in the pediatric inpatient setting. To assess the rates of medication errors, adverse drug events (ADEs), and potential ADEs; to compare pediatric rates with previously reported adult rates; to analyze the major types of errors; and to evaluate the potential impact of prevention strategies. Prospective cohort study of 1120 patients admitted to 2 academic institutions during 6 weeks in April and May of 1999. Medication errors, potential ADEs, and ADEs were identified by clinical staff reports and review of medication order sheets, medication administration records, and patient charts. We reviewed 10 778 medication orders and found 616 medication errors (5.7%), 115 potential ADEs (1.1%), and 26 ADEs (0.24%). Of the 26 ADEs, 5 (19%) were preventable. While the preventable ADE rate was similar to that of a previous adult hospital study, the potential ADE rate was 3 times higher. The rate of potential ADEs was significantly higher in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit. Most potential ADEs occurred at the stage of drug ordering (79%) and involved incorrect dosing (34%), anti-infective drugs (28%), and intravenous medications (54%). Physician reviewers judged that computerized physician order entry could potentially have prevented 93% and ward-based clinical pharmacists 94% of potential ADEs. Medication errors are common in pediatric inpatient settings, and further efforts are needed to reduce them.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Quality in Australian Health Care Study.

            A review of the medical records of over 14,000 admissions to 28 hospitals in New South Wales and South Australia revealed that 16.6% of these admissions were associated with an "adverse event", which resulted in disability or a longer hospital stay for the patient and was caused by health care management; 51% of the adverse events were considered preventable. In 77.1% the disability had resolved within 12 months, but in 13.7% the disability was permanent and in 4.9% the patient died.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events.

              To evaluate the frequency of medication errors using a multidisciplinary approach, to classify these errors by type, and to determine how often medication errors are associated with adverse drug events (ADEs) and potential ADEs. Medication errors were detected using self-report by pharmacists, nurse review of all patient charts, and review of all medication sheets. Incidents that were thought to represent ADEs or potential ADEs were identified through spontaneous reporting from nursing or pharmacy personnel, solicited reporting from nurses, and daily chart review by the study nurse. Incidents were subsequently classified by two independent reviewers as ADEs or potential ADEs. Three medical units at an urban tertiary care hospital. A cohort of 379 consecutive admissions during a 51-day period (1,704 patient-days). None. Over the study period, 10,070 medication orders were written, and 530 medications errors were identified (5.3 errors/100 orders), for a mean of 0.3 medication errors per patient-day, or 1.4 per admission. Of the medication errors, 53% involved at least one missing dose of a medication; 15% involved other dose errors, 8% frequency errors, and 5% route errors. During the same period, 25 ADEs and 35 potential ADEs were found. Of the 25 ADEs, five (20%) were associated with medication errors; all were judged preventable. Thus, five of 530 medication errors (0.9%) resulted in ADEs. Physician computer order entry could have prevented 84% of non-missing dose medication errors, 86% of potential ADEs, and 60% of preventable ADEs. Medication errors are common, although relatively few result in ADEs. However, those that do are preventable, many through physician computer order entry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Healthc Patient Saf
                Drug Healthc Patient Saf
                DHPS
                dhps
                Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
                Dove
                1179-1365
                31 January 2020
                2020
                : 12
                : 31-40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Astrid Lindgren’s Children’s Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Trauma and Reparative Medicine Theme, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                [4 ]Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Per Nydert Astrid Lindgren Children´s Hospital at Karolinska University Hospital , StockholmSE-171 76, SwedenTel +46 8 51770000 Email per.nydert@sll.se
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-0352
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-2237
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-3781
                Article
                232604
                10.2147/DHPS.S232604
                6999776
                32099481
                5754bc46-61fc-4016-b96f-ef0c86c59441
                © 2020 Nydert et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 26 September 2019
                : 13 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, References: 26, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Original Research

                Public health
                patient safety,pediatrics,adverse drug event,pharmaceutical preparation,inpatients
                Public health
                patient safety, pediatrics, adverse drug event, pharmaceutical preparation, inpatients

                Comments

                Comment on this article