11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Eight‐Year Follow‐Up Study on the Treatment of Single‐Level Cervical Spondylosis Through Intervertebral Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To compare the efficacy and safety of the postoperative long‐term effect of the treatment of single‐level cervical spondylosis through anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR).

          Methods

          This is a retrospective contrastive study, which was conducted for the period of January 2007 and January 2009 at the Department of Spine Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. A total of 113 patients were divided into two groups depending on the operation method: ACDF group (fusion group, n = 66) and ACDR group (replacement group, n = 47). The ACDR group comprised of 23 males and 24 females. The age of these patients ranged from 31–60 years, with an average age of 42.89 ± 6.30 years. The ACDF group comprised of 38 males and 28 females. The age of these patients ranged from 28–73 years old, with an average age of 49.38 ± 9.89 years old. The evaluation index included the visual analogue scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), range of motion, dysphagia, adjacent vertebral disease, and related complications (prosthesis displacement, heterotopic ossification, etc.).

          Results

          A total of 113 patients met the inclusion criteria, and these patients receive more than 96 months of follow‐up. The VAS and NDI of these two groups of patients significantly improved, when compared with those before the operation. In the last follow‐up visit, the range of motion in the ACDR group and ACDF group was 43.22 ± 3.58 and 32.54 ± 2.82, respectively, and both are significantly different comparing to the values measured before the operation ( P < 0.05). The dysphagia incidence of the ACDR group was higher than that of the ACDF group at the 36th month, but was lower than that of the ACDF group in other points time. In the last follow‐up visit, six patients (12.77%) in the ACDR group and 18 patients (27.27%) in the ACDF suffered from adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The general complication rate in the replacement group and fusion group was 38.31% and 37.88%, respectively, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).

          Conclusion

          Overall, the clinical efficacy and related complication rate of single‐level cervical spondylosis after an anterior cervical approach operation was superior in the ACDR group when compared to the ACDF group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study.

          A prospective longitudinal study was conducted to evaluate dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. To evaluate the incidence and natural history of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery, and to identify risk factors for the development of postoperative dysphagia. The literature contains only retrospective evaluations of postoperative dysphagia. A wide range of incidence has been reported in these studies. Altogether, 249 consecutive patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery were eligible for the study. These patients were contacted 1, 2, 6, and 12 months after the procedure to evaluate swallowing. Risk factors such as age, gender, procedure type, hardware use, and number and location of surgical levels addressed were assessed. Dysphagia incidences of 50.2%, 32.2%, 17.8%, and 12.5% were found at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 6 months after the procedure, only 4.8% of the patients were experiencing moderate or severe dysphagia. Patient age, type of procedure (corpectomy vs. discectomy or primary vs. revision), hardware presence, and location of surgical levels were not statistically significant risk factors for the development of postoperative dysphagia. Female gender was significant for increased risk of dysphagia at 6 months. Surgery at multiple disc levels increased the risk of postoperative dysphagia at 1 and 2 months. The etiology of the dysphagia in most of the patients was unknown. However, vocal cord paresis was identified in 1.3% of the patients at 12 months. Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery is a common early finding. However, it decreases significantly by 6 months. The minority of patients experience moderate or severe symptoms by 6 months after the procedure. Female gender and multiple surgical levels could be identified as risk factors for the development of postoperative dysphagia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery?

            Existing studies suggest a relatively high incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). The majority of these studies, however, are retrospective in nature and lack a control group. We therefore (1) prospectively determined the incidence and severity of dysphagia after ACDF using lumbar decompression patients as a control group; and (2) determined which factors, if any, are associated with increased postoperative dysphagia. Patients undergoing either one- or two-level ACDF (n=38) or posterior lumbar decompression (n=56) were prospectively followed. Baseline patient characteristics were recorded. A dysphagia questionnaire was administered preoperatively and during the 2-week, 6-week, and 12-week postoperative visits. We found no differences in patient age, body mass index, or the preoperative incidence and severity of dysphagia between the cervical and lumbar groups. We compared the incidence and severity of dysphagia between the patients who had cervical and lumbar surgery. Postoperatively, 71% of patients having cervical spine surgery reported dysphagia at 2 weeks followup. This incidence decreased to 8% at 12 weeks followup. The incidence and severity of dysphagia were greater in the cervical group at 2 and 6 weeks followup with a trend toward greater dysphagia at 12 weeks followup. Body mass index, gender, location of surgery, and the number of surgical levels were not related to the risk of developing dysphagia. We observed a correlation between operative time and the severity of postoperative dysphagia. Dysphagia is common after ACDF. The incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia decreases over time, although symptoms may persist at least 12 weeks after surgery. Level II, prospective, comparative study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.

              Prospective, multicenter, randomized Food and Drug Administration approved investigational device exemption clinical trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                shengwb1983@163.com
                Journal
                Orthop Surg
                Orthop Surg
                10.1111/(ISSN)1757-7861
                OS
                Orthopaedic Surgery
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1757-7853
                1757-7861
                14 April 2020
                June 2020
                : 12
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/os.v12.3 )
                : 717-726
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Spine Surgery The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi China
                [ 2 ] The Second Department of Orthopedics Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi China
                [ 3 ] Department of Orthopedics The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address for correspondence Jun Sheng, MD, Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, No. 137, Liyushan South Road, New Urban Area, Urumqi, China 830099. Tel: +86 136 0999 6875; Fax: +86 0991 4362829; Email: shengwb1983@ 123456163.com
                [†]

                Contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0313-4744
                Article
                OS12634
                10.1111/os.12634
                7307226
                32291950
                56671004-0dd2-4031-893a-e975a1fd9ef8
                © 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 10 October 2019
                : 13 January 2020
                : 21 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Pages: 10, Words: 6004
                Categories
                Clinical Article
                Clinical Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:22.06.2020

                anterior cervical decompression and fusion,cervical spondylosis,intervertebral disc replacement,long‐term complication rate

                Comments

                Comment on this article