32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Critical care in internal medicine department: EBM approach and new organizational model for Italian National Health Service

      abstract
      1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central
      22nd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
      19-22 March 2002

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During the last decade the number of over-60 patients with multiple organ dysfunction admitted in the Departments of Internal Medicine in Italy has considerably increased. Many of these patients are critically ill and needs to be treated by trained medical staff with experience in internal medicine and an olistic approach. Several studies carried out in ICUs show that prognosis of elderly patients affected by multiple organ dysfunction is related to the number and severity of comorbidity regardless of age. Furthermore many survived patients dismissed from ICUs cannot reach the previous level of performance and global quality of life. One randomized controlled trial on chronically critically ill patients compared performances of traditional intensive care units with low technology 'Special Care Unit' managed by specialist in internal medicine, supported by sub-intensive nursing. These units obtained comparable clinical outcomes (mortality, complications) and better value (economic cost, stay of hospitalization). On the basis of these data and the characteristics of Italian National Health Service, we created in our Department of Internal Medicine a 'protected area' for critically ill patients affected by internistic diseases with complex comorbidities needing continuous monitoring of vital parameters and therapies. Medical staff working in this area have been trained in emergency medicine and are supported by nurses ACLS (Advanced Cardiac Life Support) certified. This unity is constituted by four beds with monitoring of EKG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse, oximetry, body temperature, connected with a central computerized unit. Moreover, in this room are available ABG, ph-metry, and CPR equipment. Currently in Italy, this kind of patients are admitted in ICUs, often with unappropriated use of resources or in Department of Internal Medicine with inadequate quality of care. We are planning a case-control study to compare the outcomes of patients admitted in our new 'protected area' with those of matched patients previously admitted in our Department of Internal Medicine. The results of this investigation could supply data to support the creation of other 'protected areas' in Departments of Internal Medicine in our country. Furthermore this new approach could promote the renaissance of the role of Internal Medicine in Italian National Hospital System and help to release resources for the ICUs and other specialties.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Health-related quality of life of multiple organ dysfunction patients one year after intensive care.

          To assess the quality of life (QOL) of intensive care survivors 1 year after discharge with special emphasis on multiple organ dysfunction (MOD). Prospective, observational study. A ten-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital. Among the 591 consecutive patients admitted in the year 1995, 307 of 378 patients who survived 1 year were studied. None. A generic scale assessing health-related QOL, the RAND 36-item Health Survey (RAND 36) was sent by mail 12 months after discharge. Data concerning age, severity of illness, organ dysfunctions and diagnoses were recorded. Of 307 patients, 98 (31.9 %) were able to work. The QOL measured by the RAND 36 showed clinically relevant impairment in emotional and physical role limitations compared with an age- and sex-matched general population. MOD (n = 131, 42.7 %) had a statistically significant negative effect on all QOL domains, except bodily pain and mental health, with the only clinically relevant impairment being in vitality and emotional role limitations compared with non-MOD patients. Of the 131 MOD patients, 36 (27.4 %) were able to work, 26 (19.8%) had severe limitations in their daily activities and 5 (3.8 %) were unable to live at home 1 year after discharge. One year after intensive care the survivors had a lower QOL than an age-matched general population with clinically relevant further impairment of MOD patients in vitality and emotional role limitations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcomes of critically ill elderly patients: is high-dependency care for geriatric patients worthwhile?

            To study the outcomes of elderly patients in a high-dependency care unit and to evaluate the costs and benefits of a geriatric high-dependency unit (GHDU). Prospective data collection and analysis. Geriatric high-dependency unit. One hundred fifty patients > or =70 yrs of age who had been admitted to the GHDU over a 10-month period were investigated during their treatment and rehabilitation. The patients' Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores and Simplified Acute Physiology Scores (SAPS) were recorded. The APACHE II scores and SAPSs provided a close correlation with the patients' mortality (correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.92, respectively). The SAPS proved to have a better linear relationship with the elderly patients' mortality in comparison with APACHE II scores. Most of the elderly patients included in the study were suffering from multiple premorbid medical problems. Overall, the mortality rate up to 1 month after discharge from the hospital was 48%. For patients ranging in age from 70 to 84 yrs, the 1-month mortality was 39.6%; however, for patients > or =85 yrs of age, the 1-month mortality was 68.1%. The mortality ratio was 0.96 (for all patients), 0.88 (for those ages 70-84 yrs), and 1.05 (for those age 85 yrs and above). For patients with nil organ system failure, the mortality rate was 32%. For patients with one organ system failure, the mortality increased to 48%. For patients with two organ system failures, the mortality rate was 86%. Survival for patients with three or more organ system failures was unprecedented. Survivors and nonsurvivors were compared. Three poor-prognosis groups were identified: group 1, patients who had received preadmission cardiopulmonary resuscitation; group 2, patients with a recent history of malignant diseases; and group 3, patients who had been mechanically ventilated. All three groups had a significantly higher mortality than those without these factors (p 20 and >30, respectively, had a poor prognosis. The geriatric outcome scoring system (GOSS) was used as the functional outcome test for the survivors. The GOSS has three components: activities of daily living, mobility status, and social condition. At 1 month after discharge, 66.7% of the survivors returned to their premorbid activities of daily living abilities, 79.5% maintained their mobility status, and 91.7% remained at the same social environment. No survivors deteriorated more than one grade in any of the three components measured by the GOSS. The severity-of-illness scores, percentage of mechanical ventilation utilization, mortality rate, length of GHDU stay, and total hospital stay were comparable with those of other intensive care units (ICUs). The cost of 1 GHDU bed-day was equivalent to 24% of 1 ICU bed-day. The prognostic information that we gathered from an unselected group of critically ill elderly patients is useful. The GHDU achieved treatment results similar to those achieved by an ICU and is therefore seen as an innovative way of treating critically ill elderly patients. High-dependency care for the elderly patient is worthwhile.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patient outcomes for the chronically critically ill: special care unit versus intensive care unit.

              The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a low-technology environment of care and a nurse case management case delivery system (special care unit, SCU) with the traditional high-technology environment (ICU) and primary nursing care delivery system on the patient outcomes of length of stay, mortality, readmission, complications, satisfaction, and cost. A sample of 220 chronically critically ill patients were randomly assigned to either the SCU (n = 145) or the ICU (n = 75). Few significant differences were found between the two groups in length of stay, mortality, or complications. However, the findings showed significant cost savings in the SCU group in the charges accrued during the study period and in the charges and costs to produce a survivor. The average total cost of delivering care was $5,000 less per patient in the SCU than in the traditional ICU. In addition, the cost to produce a survivor was $19,000 less in the SCU. Results from this 4-year clinical trial demonstrate that nurse case managers in a SCU setting can produce patient outcomes equal to or better than those in the traditional ICU care environment for long-term critically ill patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Conference
                Crit Care
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                2002
                1 March 2002
                : 6
                : Suppl 1
                : P249
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Struttura Complessa di Medicina Interna, Azienda Ospedaliera 'Villa Sofia-CTO', Palermo, Italy
                Article
                cc1717
                10.1186/cc1717
                3333676
                564d299f-9187-4d31-8e2d-ac3d47648105
                22nd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
                Brussels, Belgium
                19-22 March 2002
                History
                Categories
                Meeting Abstract

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article