19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A cluster-randomized controlled study to evaluate a team coaching concept for improving teamwork and patient-centeredness in rehabilitation teams

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Although the relevance of interprofessional teamwork in the delivery of patient-centered care is well known, there is a lack of interventions for improving team interaction in the context of rehabilitation in Germany. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether a specially developed team coaching concept (TCC) could improve both teamwork and patient-centeredness.

          Method

          A multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled intervention study was conducted with both staff and patient questionnaires. Data was collected at ten German rehabilitation clinics (five clusters) of different indication fields before (t1) and after (t2) the intervention. Intervention clinics received the TCC, while control clinics did not receive any treatment. Staff questionnaires were used to measure internal participation and other aspects of teamwork, such as team organization, while patient questionnaires assessed patient-centeredness. A multivariate analysis of variance was applied for data analysis.

          Results

          In order to analyze the effect of TCC on internal participation and teamwork, 305 questionnaires were included for t1 and 213 for t2 in the staff survey. In the patient survey, 523 questionnaires were included for t1 and 545 for t2. The TCC improved team organization, willingness to accept responsibility and knowledge integration according to staff, with small effect sizes (univariate: η 2 =.010–.017), whereas other parameters including internal participation, team leadership and cohesion did not improve due to the intervention. The patient survey did not show any improvements on the assessed dimensions.

          Conclusion

          The TCC improved dimensions that were addressed directly by the approach and were linked to the clinics’ needs, such as restructured team meetings and better exchange of information. The TCC can be used to improve team organization, willingness to accept responsibility, and knowledge integration in rehabilitation practice, but some further evaluation is needed to understand contextual factors and processes regarding the implementation of the intervention.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature.

          A 'patient-centred' approach is increasingly regarded as crucial for the delivery of high quality care by doctors. However, there is considerable ambiguity concerning the exact meaning of the term and the optimum method of measuring the process and outcomes of patient-centred care. This paper reviews the conceptual and empirical literature in order to develop a model of the various aspects of the doctor-patient relationship encompassed by the concept of 'patient-centredness' and to assess the advantages and disadvantages of alternative methods of measurement. Five conceptual dimensions are identified: biopsychosocial perspective; 'patient-as-person'; sharing power and responsibility; therapeutic alliance; and 'doctor-as-person'. Two main approaches to measurement are evaluated: self-report instruments and external observation methods. A number of recommendations concerning the measurement of patient-centredness are made.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis

            Background Existing models of patient-centeredness reveal a lack of conceptual clarity. This results in a heterogeneous use of the term, unclear measurement dimensions, inconsistent results regarding the effectiveness of patient-centered interventions, and finally in difficulties in implementing patient-centered care. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the different dimensions of patient-centeredness described in the literature and to propose an integrative model of patient-centeredness based on these results. Methods Protocol driven search in five databases, combined with a comprehensive secondary search strategy. All articles that include a definition of patient-centeredness were eligible for inclusion in the review and subject to subsequent content analysis. Two researchers independently first screened titles and abstracts, then assessed full texts for eligibility. In each article the given definition of patient-centeredness was coded independently by two researchers. We discussed codes within the research team and condensed them into an integrative model of patient-centeredness. Results 4707 records were identified through primary and secondary search, of which 706 were retained after screening of titles and abstracts. 417 articles (59%) contained a definition of patient-centeredness and were coded. 15 dimensions of patient-centeredness were identified: essential characteristics of clinician, clinician-patient relationship, clinician-patient communication, patient as unique person, biopsychosocial perspective, patient information, patient involvement in care, involvement of family and friends, patient empowerment, physical support, emotional support, integration of medical and non-medical care, teamwork and teambuilding, access to care, coordination and continuity of care. In the resulting integrative model the dimensions were mapped onto different levels of care. Conclusions The proposed integrative model of patient-centeredness allows different stakeholders to speak the same language. It provides a foundation for creating better measures and interventions. It can also be used to inform the development of clinical guidance documents and health policy directives, and through this support the shift towards patient-centered health care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A THEORY OF TEAM COACHING.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: InvestigationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 July 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 7
                : e0180171
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
                [2 ] Celenus-Kliniken GmbH, Offenburg, Germany
                [3 ] Moving-Concept, Freiburg, Germany
                [4 ] Saarland University of Cooperative Education in Health Care and Welfare, Saarbrücken, Germany
                Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, FRANCE
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-31246
                10.1371/journal.pone.0180171
                5509115
                28704377
                556cdafc-b405-4168-9ec9-c1d6414a2f60
                © 2017 Körner et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 August 2016
                : 12 June 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 10, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung;
                Award ID: 01GX1024
                Funded by: Deutsche Rentenversicherung
                Award ID: 01GX1024
                This study was supported by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, https://www.bmbf.de/; Deutsche Rentenversicherung—Bund, http://www.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de/Bund/de/Navigation/0_Home/home_node.html, grant number: 01GX1024. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Questionnaires
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Patients
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Europe
                Germany
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Decision Making
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Team Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Team Behavior
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Pilot Studies
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article