27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What Do Patients Complain About Online: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy Framework Based on Patient Centeredness

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Complaints made online by patients about their health care experiences are becoming prevalent because of widespread worldwide internet connectivity. An a priori framework, based on patient centeredness, may be useful in identifying the types of issues patients complain about online across multiple settings. It may also assist in examining whether the determinants of patient-centered care (PCC) mirror the determinants of patient experiences.

          Objective

          The objective of our study was to develop a taxonomy framework for patient complaints online based on patient centeredness and to examine whether the determinants of PCC mirror the determinants of patient experiences.

          Methods

          First, the best fit framework synthesis technique was applied to develop the proposed a priori framework. Second, electronic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched for articles published between 2000 and June 2018. Studies were only included if they collected primary quantitative data on patients’ online complaints. Third, a deductive and inductive thematic analysis approach was adopted to code the themes of recognized complaints into the framework.

          Results

          In total, 17 studies from 5 countries were included in this study. Patient complaint online taxonomies and theme terms varied. According to our framework, patients expressed most dissatisfaction with patient-centered processes (101,586/204,363, 49.71%), followed by prerequisites (appropriate skills and knowledge of physicians; 50,563, 24.74%) and the care environment (48,563/204,363, 23.76%). The least dissatisfied theme was expected outcomes (3651/204,363, 1.79%). People expressed little dissatisfaction with expanded PCC dimensions, such as involvement of family and friends (591/204,363, 0.29%). Variation in the concerns across different countries’ patients were also observed.

          Conclusions

          Online complaints made by patients are of major value to health care providers, regulatory bodies, and patients themselves. Our PCC framework can be applied to analyze them under a wide range of conditions, treatments, and countries. This review has shown significant heterogeneity of patients’ online complaints across different countries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Quality of Care

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing.

            To identify the common, core elements of patient-centred care in the health policy, medical and nursing literature. Healthcare reform is being driven by the rhetoric around patient-centred care yet no common definition exists and few integrated reviews undertaken. Narrative review and synthesis. Key seminal texts and papers from patient organizations, policy documents, and medical and nursing studies which looked at patient-centred care in the acute care setting. Search sources included Medline, CINHAL, SCOPUS, and primary policy documents and texts covering the period from 1990-March 2010. A narrative review and synthesis was undertaken including empirical, descriptive, and discursive papers. Initially, generic search terms were used to capture relevant literature; the selection process was narrowed to seminal texts (Stage 1 of the review) and papers from three key areas (in Stage 2). In total, 60 papers were included in the review and synthesis. Seven were from health policy, 22 from medicine, and 31 from nursing literature. Few common definitions were found across the literature. Three core themes, however, were identified: patient participation and involvement, the relationship between the patient and the healthcare professional, and the context where care is delivered. Three core themes describing patient-centred care have emerged from the health policy, medical, and nursing literature. This may indicate a common conceptual source. Different professional groups tend to focus on or emphasize different elements within the themes. This may affect the success of implementing patient-centred care in practice. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The patient experience and health outcomes.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J. Med. Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                August 2019
                07 August 2019
                : 21
                : 8
                : e14634
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Medicine and Health Management Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
                [2 ] Library, Tongji Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
                [3 ] College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences Brunel University London London United Kingdom
                [4 ] Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics College of Business Florida International University Miami, FL United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Jingdong Ma jdma@ 123456hust.edu.cn
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7301-0125
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-3838
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0560
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1036-4222
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-0705
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-4579
                Article
                v21i8e14634
                10.2196/14634
                6702801
                31392961
                64397b1a-4fa3-45f7-a698-8137d8d44eff
                ©Jing Liu, Shengchao Hou, Richard Evans, Chenxi Xia, Weidong Xia, Jingdong Ma. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 07.08.2019.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/.as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 7 May 2019
                : 29 May 2019
                : 5 June 2019
                : 9 June 2019
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                Medicine
                patient-centered care,delivery of health care,systematic review,taxonomy
                Medicine
                patient-centered care, delivery of health care, systematic review, taxonomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article