4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The implementation and outcomes of self‐managing teams in elderly care: A scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          We aim to map the existing evidence and gaps in research on the implementation and outcomes of self‐managing elderly care teams.

          Background

          Due to increasing demand for elderly nursing care and an ageing workforce, recruiting and retaining community nurses have become challenging. Implementing self‐managing teams may be a solution to address this problem.

          Evaluation

          This scoping review included 27 studies, varying from narrative reviews to a quantitative cross‐sectional study. The studies' primary focus on self‐managing teams was essential for eligibility.

          Key issues

          Nurses' job satisfaction was high in self‐managing teams due to improved relationships with patients and increased autonomy. Continuity of care and patient acceptability were high. Transformation of managers to coaches in a team with a flat hierarchy is needed to empower nurses with responsibility for their own work. Trust and teamwork should be assisted by suitable ICT support systems.

          Conclusions

          International interest in self‐managing teams is large, but quantitative research is limited and guidelines for implementation are needed. Recommendations for potential successful implementation were made.

          Implications for Nursing Management

          Nurse autonomy and job satisfaction can increase by implementing self‐managing teams. This requires a change in management styles, from managing to coaching nurses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Master Studentjeanine.debruin@live.nl
                Role: Postdocotral Researcher
                Role: Research Professor
                Role: Assistant Professor
                Journal
                J Nurs Manag
                J Nurs Manag
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2834
                JONM
                Journal of Nursing Management
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0966-0429
                1365-2834
                17 October 2022
                November 2022
                : 30
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1111/jonm.v30.8 )
                : 4549-4559
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Experimental Orthopedics, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland
                [ 4 ] Department of International Health. CAPHRI ‐ Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jeanine de Bruin, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

                Email: jeanine.debruin@ 123456live.nl

                Article
                JONM13836
                10.1111/jonm.13836
                10092661
                36192833
                554753af-a648-43b8-ae57-33bf2d75d6a5
                © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Nursing Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 07 September 2022
                : 13 March 2022
                : 29 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 11, Words: 8099
                Categories
                Review Article
                Regular Issue
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:12.04.2023

                elderly care,job satisfaction,nurses,scoping review,self‐managing teams

                Comments

                Comment on this article