AGREE II appraisals of clinical practice guidelines in rehabilitation showed poor reporting and moderate variability in quality ratings when users apply different cuff-offs: a methodological study.

Bargeri, Silvia; Iannicelli, Valerio; Castellini, Greta; Cinquini, Michela; Gianola, Silvia

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.021

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

AGREE II appraisals of clinical practice guidelines in rehabilitation showed poor reporting and moderate variability in quality ratings when users apply different cuff-offs: a methodological study.

Author(s): Silvia Bargeri ¹ , Valerio Iannicelli ² , Greta Castellini ³ , Michela Cinquini ⁴ , Silvia Gianola ¹

Publication date (Electronic): November 2021

Journal: Journal of clinical epidemiology

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Keywords: AGREE II instrument, Methodological guideline appraisal, Methodological quality, Methodology, Research, practice guideline, practice guidelines as topic, rehabilitation

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To analyze the reporting characteristics of Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II appraisals in rehabilitation and explore how much quality ratings of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) vary applying different cut-offs.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Clin Epidemiol

Title: Journal of clinical epidemiology

Publisher: Elsevier BV

ISSN (Electronic): 1878-5921

ISSN (Print): 0895-4356

Publication date (Electronic): November 2021

Volume: 139

Affiliations

[1 ] IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.

[2 ] IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

[3 ] IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: greta.castellini@grupposandonato.it.

[4 ] Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Article

Publisher Item ID: S0895-4356(21)00266-3

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.021

PubMed ID: 34437947

SO-VID: 5432c353-6cf0-47e6-af49-aa08a02ed540

History

Keywords: AGREE II instrument,rehabilitation,practice guidelines as topic,practice guideline,Methodology, Research,Methodological quality,Methodological guideline appraisal

Data availability:

Keywords: AGREE II instrument, rehabilitation, practice guidelines as topic, practice guideline, Methodology, Research, Methodological quality, Methodological guideline appraisal

AGREE II appraisals of clinical practice guidelines in rehabilitation showed poor reporting and moderate variability in quality ratings when users apply different cuff-offs: a methodological study.

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Special feature: Methodological Innovations in Qualitative Educational Research

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 16

Cited by 11