AGREE II appraisals of clinical practice guidelines in rehabilitation showed poor reporting and moderate variability in quality ratings when users apply different cuff-offs: a methodological study.
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
To analyze the reporting characteristics of Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation
(AGREE) II appraisals in rehabilitation and explore how much quality ratings of Clinical
Practice Guidelines (CPGs) vary applying different cut-offs.