4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician–Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Physician recommendation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a critical facilitator of screening completion. Providing patients a choice of screening options may increase CRC screening completion, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities.

          OBJECTIVE

          Our purpose was to assess the effectiveness of physician-only and physician–patient interventions on increasing rates of CRC screening discussions as compared to usual care.

          DESIGN

          This study was quasi-experimental. Clinics were allocated to intervention or usual care; patients in intervention clinics were randomized to receipt of patient intervention.

          PARTICIPANTS

          Patients aged 50 to 75 years, due for CRC screening, receiving care at either a federally qualified health care center or an academic health center participated in the study.

          INTERVENTION

          Intervention physicians received continuous quality improvement and communication skills training. Intervention patients watched an educational video immediately before their appointment.

          MAIN MEASURES

          Rates of patient-reported 1) CRC screening discussions, and 2) discussions of more than one screening test.

          KEY RESULTS

          The physician–patient intervention ( n = 167) resulted in higher rates of CRC screening discussions compared to both physician-only intervention ( n = 183; 61.1 % vs.50.3 %, p = 0.008) and usual care ( n = 153; 61.1 % vs. 34.0 % p = 0.03). More discussions of specific CRC screening tests and discussions of more than one test occurred in the intervention arms than in usual care (44.6 % vs. 22.9 %, p = 0.03) and (5.1 % vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.036), respectively, but discussion of more than one test was uncommon. Across all arms, 143 patients (28.4 %) reported discussion of colonoscopy only; 21 (4.2 %) reported discussion of both colonoscopy and stool tests.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Compared to usual care and a physician-only intervention, a physician–patient intervention increased rates of CRC screening discussions, yet discussions overwhelmingly focused solely on colonoscopy. In underserved patient populations where access to colonoscopy may be limited, interventions encouraging discussions of both stool tests and colonoscopy may be needed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          +1-312-6954689 , ndolan@nmff.org
          Journal
          J Gen Intern Med
          J Gen Intern Med
          Journal of General Internal Medicine
          Springer US (New York )
          0884-8734
          1525-1497
          19 May 2015
          December 2015
          : 30
          : 12
          : 1780-1787
          Affiliations
          [ ]Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 N. St. Clair St. Suite 18-200, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
          [ ]Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
          [ ]Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL USA
          [ ]Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
          [ ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL USA
          [ ]Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
          [ ]Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
          Article
          PMC4636583 PMC4636583 4636583 3381
          10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8
          4636583
          25986137
          52f4b64e-de02-4123-805b-c9f225cc69aa
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2015
          History
          : 21 October 2014
          : 16 March 2015
          : 15 April 2015
          Categories
          Original Research
          Custom metadata
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2015

          physician communication of preventive care,colorectal cancer screening,health literacy,randomized trial

          Comments

          Comment on this article