10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current Practice in Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia in Public Hospitals of Greece: A 2016 National Survey

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims:

          This descriptive survey was to evaluate the use of regional anesthesia in obstetrics in Greek public hospitals.

          Methods:

          The survey was conducted between March and August 2016. A structured questionnaire was sent to 50 anesthesia departments in Greek public hospitals with obstetric units.

          Results:

          The response rate was 94%. Data corresponding to 9475 cesarean and 8155 vaginal deliveries were collected. Regional anesthesia was used in 69.2% of all cesareans, with single shot spinal being the most popular (44.3% of all cesareans). Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was used in 18.1% of all cesareans (35.1% in hospitals of Athens versus 7.9% outside Athens, p<0.001). Post-cesarean analgesia was applied with simple analgesics and systematic opioids (78.6%). Long-acting spinal opioids were rarely used (4.4% of spinal and spinal/epidurals). Labor epidural analgesia was applied in 19.1% of all vaginal deliveries (30.3% in Athens versus 13.1% outside Athens, p<0.001). Paracetamol and pethidine represented the standard labor analgesics in 48.9% and 55.3% of all hospitals. Intravenous remifentanil was used in 10.6% of hospitals (50% in Athens versus 2.5% outside Athens, p=0.002). In 48.9% of hospitals, mainly outside Athens, the anesthesiologists did not get involved in labor analgesia.

          Conclusion:

          Regional anesthesia is the most common practice for cesareans in Greek public hospitals; however, the percentage of general anesthesia remains high. In addition, the use of labor epidural analgesia is limited in hospitals outside Athens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies.

          Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is an iatrogenic complication of neuraxial blockade. We systematically reviewed the literature on parturients to determine the frequency, onset, and duration of PDPH. Citations on PDPH in the obstetrical population were identified by computerized searches, citation review, and hand searches of abstracts and conference proceedings. Citations were included if they contained extractable data on frequency, onset, or duration of PDPH. Using meta-analysis, we calculated pooled estimates of the frequency of accidental dural puncture for epidural needles and pooled estimates of the frequencies of PDPH for epidural and spinal needles. Parturients have approximately a 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5% to 1.5%) risk of accidental dural puncture with epidural insertion. Of these, approximately half (52.1%; 95% CI, 51.4% to 52.8%) will result in PDPH. The risk of PDPH from spinal needles diminishes with small diameter, atraumatic needles, but is still appreciable (Whitacre 27-gauge needle 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.6% to 1.8%). PDPH occurs as early as one day and as late as seven days after dural puncture and lasts 12 hr to seven days. PDPH is a common complication for parturients undergoing neuraxial blockade.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Postdural puncture headache

            Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication after inadvertent dural puncture. Risks factors include female sex, young age, pregnancy, vaginal delivery, low body mass index, and being a non-smoker. Needle size, design, and the technique used also affect the risk. Because PDPH can be incapacitating, prompt diagnosis and treatment are mandatory. A diagnostic hallmark of PDPH is a postural headache that worsens with sitting or standing, and improves with lying down. Conservative therapies such as bed rest, hydration, and caffeine are commonly used as prophylaxis and treatment for this condition; however, no substantial evidence supports routine bed rest and aggressive hydration. An epidural blood patch is the most effective treatment option for patients with unsuccessful conservative management. Various other prophylactic and treatment interventions have been suggested. However, due to a lack of conclusive evidence supporting their use, the potential benefits of such interventions should be weighed carefully against the risks. This article reviews the current literature on the diagnosis, risk factors, pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of PDPH.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes.

              Neuraxial analgesic techniques are the gold standards for pain relief during labour and delivery. Despite the increased use and known benefits of neuraxial labour analgesia, there has been significant controversy regarding the impact of neuraxial analgesia on labour outcomes. Review of the evidence suggests that effective neuraxial labour analgesia does not increase the rate of Caesarean delivery, even when administered early in the course of labour; however, its use is associated with a prolonged second stage of labour. Effective second-stage analgesia might also be associated with an increased rate of instrumental vaginal delivery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Balkan Med J
                Balkan Med J
                BMJ
                Balkan Medical Journal
                Galenos Publishing
                2146-3123
                2146-3131
                September 2018
                21 September 2018
                : 35
                : 5
                : 394-397
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
                [2 ]Clinic of Anesthesia, Asklipieio Voulas General Hospital, Athens, Greece
                [3 ]Clinic of Anesthesia, Georgios Gennimatas General Hospital, Athens, Greece
                [4 ]Clinic of Anesthesia, Creta Interclinic Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
                [5 ]Clinic of Anesthesia, General University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
                [6 ]Clinic of Anesthesia, General Hospital of Attica KAT, Athens, Greece
                Author notes
                * Address for Correspondence: Clinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece Phone: +30 210 621 88 19 E-mail: c_staikou@ 123456yahoo.gr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-0443
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-4642
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-2181
                Article
                19697
                10.4274/balkanmedj.2018.0083
                6158474
                29914232
                52f348ee-c55f-471e-bdae-c677181709a0
                © Copyright 2018, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine

                Balkan Medical Journal

                History
                : 8 February 2018
                : 14 June 2018
                Categories
                Brief Report

                analgesia,healthcare,obstetrical,regional anesthesia,survey
                analgesia, healthcare, obstetrical, regional anesthesia, survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article