For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
1
views
38
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      234
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Coping Profiles and Differences in Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Clients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Latent Profile Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Receiving assisted reproductive technology is stressful due to its long-lasting process, which might pose negative impacts on clients’ psychological well-being and quality of life. This study was to investigate coping profiles among couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology and examine their associations with psychological distress and quality of life.

          Methods

          This cross-sectional study was conducted at the IVF center of a specialized hospital in Shanghai, China. Of 502 eligible clients completed a structured, online survey of socio-demographic information, Dyadic Coping Inventory, Kessler Psychological Stress Scale, and Fertility quality of life. Coping profiles were identified using latent profile analysis and differences between identified profiles on psychological distress and quality of life were examined using analyses of covariance.

          Results

          A three-profile solution was supported: low dyadic coping group (n = 168, 33.50%), moderate dyadic coping group (n = 241, 48.00%), and high dyadic coping group (n = 93, 18.50%). Significant differences between those groups were found in psychological distress and quality of life.

          Conclusion

          The findings of this study have revealed dyadic coping profiles in clients undergoing assisted reproductive technology, which are differentially associated with psychological distress and quality of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new look at the statistical model identification

          H Akaike, Francisco Casacuberta (1975)
          IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723
          Article 0 comments Cited 3111 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating the Dimension of a Model

            Gideon Schwarz (1978)
            Article 0 comments Cited 2865 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

              Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger … (2014)
              Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
              Article 0 comments Cited 2564 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Multidiscip Healthc
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Multidiscip Healthc
                Journal ID (publisher-id): jmdh
                Title: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
                Publisher: Dove
                ISSN (Electronic): 1178-2390
                Publication date (Electronic): 05 February 2024
                Publication date Collection: 2024
                Volume: 17
                Pages: 533-540
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Nursing Department, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]School of Nursing, Fudan University , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]Nursing Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Hui Jiang, Nursing Department, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86 21-20261221, Email jianghuitest@163.com
                Lin Qian, Nursing Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Email lc699536@126.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0578-3556
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-6014
                Article
                Publisher ID: 444053
                DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S444053
                PMC ID: 10854257
                PubMed ID: 38343753
                SO-VID: 51a06f7a-63f1-4bde-979d-e4701dca32d4
                Copyright © © 2024 Bai et al.
                License:

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                Date received : 10 October 2023
                Date accepted : 16 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 7, References: 40, Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Clinical Medical Research Special Youth Project;
                Funded by: the Research Grant of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital;
                This study is supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Clinical Medical Research Special Youth Project (Reference number: 20204Y0132) and the Research Grant of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (Reference number: 2023HL05).
                Categories
                Subject: Original Research

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Medicine
                Keywords: assisted reproductive technology,coping,latent profile analysis,psychological distress,quality of life
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Medicine
                Keywords: assisted reproductive technology, coping, latent profile analysis, psychological distress, quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article