6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Expanded VA Hospice Care With Aggressive Care and Cost for Veterans With Advanced Lung Cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d7230892e498">This cohort study using a modified difference-in-differences study of veterans evaluates the association of concurrent cancer treatment and hospice care with less aggressive care and reduced costs at the end of life. </p><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e504">Question</h5> <p id="d7230892e506">Is increased availability of hospice for veterans associated with reduced aggressive treatments and medical care costs at the end of life? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e509">Findings</h5> <p id="d7230892e511">In this cohort study of 13 085 veterans, those with newly diagnosed end-stage lung cancer treated at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) with the most expansion in hospice use had a significantly greater likelihood of receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy after hospice enrollment but a lower likelihood of having aggressive treatment or intensive care unit use, compared with similar veterans treated in VAMCs with low hospice growth. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e514">Meaning</h5> <p id="d7230892e516">Increasing hospice availability without restricting treatment access for veterans with advanced lung cancer was associated with less aggressive medical treatment and significantly lower medical costs while still enabling veterans to receive cancer treatment. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e520">Importance</h5> <p id="d7230892e522">Medicare hospice beneficiaries discontinue disease-modifying treatments because the hospice benefit limits access. While veterans have concurrent access to hospice care and Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center (VAMC)-provided treatments, the association of this with changes in treatment and costs of veterans’ end-of-life care is unknown. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e525">Objective</h5> <p id="d7230892e527">To determine whether increasing availability of hospice care, without restrictions on disease-modifying treatments, is associated with reduced aggressive treatments and medical care costs at the end of life. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e530">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d7230892e532">A modified difference-in-differences study design, using facility fixed effects, compared patient outcomes during years with relatively high vs lower hospice use. This study evaluated 13 085 veterans newly diagnosed with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 113 VAMCs with a minimum of 5 veterans diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC per year, between 2006 and 2012. Data analyses were conducted between January 2017 and July 2018. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e535">Exposures</h5> <p id="d7230892e537">Using VA inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy claims, and similar Medicare data, we created VAMC-level annual aggregates of all patients who died of cancer for hospice use, cancer treatment, and/or concurrent receipt of both in the last month of life, dividing all VAMC years into quintiles of exposure to hospice availability. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e540">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d7230892e542">Receipt of aggressive treatments (2 or more hospital admissions within 30 days, tube feeding, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit [ICU] admission) and total costs in the first 6 months after diagnosis. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e545">Results</h5> <p id="d7230892e547">Of the 13 085 veterans included in the study, 12 858 (98%) were men; 10 531 (81%) were white, and 5949 (46%) were older than 65 years. Veterans with NSCLC treated in a VAMC in the top hospice quintile (79% hospice users), relative to the bottom quintile (55% hospice users), were more than twice as likely to have concurrent cancer treatment after initiating hospice care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.28; 95% CI, 1.67-3.31). Nonetheless, for veterans with NSCLC seen in VAMCs in the top hospice quintile, the AOR of receiving aggressive treatment in the 6 months after diagnosis was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.81), and the AOR of ICU use was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.99) relative to patients seen in VAMCs in the bottom hospice quintile. The 6-month costs were lower by an estimated $266 (95% CI, −$358 to −$164) per day for the high-quintile group vs the low-quintile group. There was no survival difference. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi190005-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d7230892e550">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d7230892e552">Increasing the availability of hospice care without restricting treatment access for veterans with advanced lung cancer was associated with less aggressive medical treatment and significantly lower costs while still providing cancer treatment. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life.

          Although many patients with end-stage cancer are offered chemotherapy to improve quality of life (QOL), the association between chemotherapy and QOL amid progressive metastatic disease has not been well-studied. American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy only for solid tumor patients with good performance status.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data.

            There are two broad classes of models used to address the econometric problems caused by skewness in data commonly encountered in health care applications: (1) transformation to deal with skewness (e.g., ordinary least square (OLS) on ln(y)); and (2) alternative weighting approaches based on exponential conditional models (ECM) and generalized linear model (GLM) approaches. In this paper, we encompass these two classes of models using the three parameter generalized Gamma (GGM) distribution, which includes several of the standard alternatives as special cases-OLS with a normal error, OLS for the log-normal, the standard Gamma and exponential with a log link, and the Weibull. Using simulation methods, we find the tests of identifying distributions to be robust. The GGM also provides a potentially more robust alternative estimator to the standard alternatives. An example using inpatient expenditures is also analyzed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use

              Health care expenditures and use are challenging to model because these dependent variables typically have distributions that are skewed with a large mass at zero. In this article, we describe estimation and interpretation of the effects of a natural experiment using two classes of nonlinear statistical models: one for health care expenditures and the other for counts of health care use. We extend prior analyses to test the effect of the ACA's young adult expansion on three different outcomes: total health care expenditures, office-based visits, and emergency department visits. Modeling the outcomes with a two-part or hurdle model, instead of a single-equation model, reveals that the ACA policy increased the number of office-based visits but decreased emergency department visits and overall spending.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncology
                JAMA Oncol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2374-2437
                March 28 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center of Innovation in Long-term Services and Supports (LTSS COIN), Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
                [2 ]Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
                [3 ]Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California
                [4 ]Center of Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California
                [5 ]Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
                [6 ]Eastern Colorado VA Healthcare System, Denver
                [7 ]University of Colorado, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Aurora
                [8 ]Veteran Experience Center (formerly, the PROMISE Center), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [9 ]University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia
                [10 ]Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California
                [11 ]Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
                [12 ]Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [13 ]Hospice and Palliative Care Program, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
                [14 ]Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
                Article
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0081
                6567823
                30920603
                50d4a2be-b0c3-483c-b522-33369e370d04
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article