8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do people really care less about their cats than about their dogs? A comparative study in three European countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Previous studies have shown that cat owners seem to care less about their cats than dog owners care about their dogs – both in terms of their emotional state of attachment and in their willingness to pay for services that potentially benefit the animals. One study speculated that this difference is “driven by the behavior of the pet” – that the behavior of dogs encourages care more than the behavior of cats – and therefore is a universal phenomenon. However, previous studies mostly relied on convenience sampling of owners and were undertaken in single countries. Based on responses to a questionnaire from cat and dog owners drawn from representative samples of citizens (18 to 89 years of age) in three different European countries, Denmark, Austria and the United Kingdom, we tested the degree to which owners care about their cats and dogs. We used four different measures: Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS), possession of pet health insurance, willingness to pay for life-saving treatment, and expectation of veterinary diagnostic and treatment options. Dog owners had higher LAPS scores in all countries. However, the difference between dog and cat owners was greater in Denmark than in Austria and the United Kingdom. More dogs than cats were insured in all three countries, but the ratio was much less skewed in favor of dogs in the United Kingdom compared to Denmark. In terms of expensive life-saving treatment, in every country, more dog owners than cat owners were willing to spend over a certain amount, but the differences were much more pronounced in Denmark compared to the United Kingdom. In Denmark and Austria, dog owners expected more veterinary treatment options to be available, but species made no difference to the expectations of UK owners. People care more about their dogs than their cats in all countries, but with a clear cross-country variation and a very modest difference in the United Kingdom. Therefore, it does not seem to be a universal phenomenon that people care much less about their cats than their dogs. This finding has practical implications for future efforts to expand the level of veterinary services provided for cat owners.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Psychometric Evaluation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of the owner-pet and client-veterinarian bond on the care that pets receive.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring attachment to companion animals: a dog is not a cat is not a bird

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                23 October 2023
                2023
                : 10
                : 1237547
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen , Frederiksberg, Denmark
                [2] 2Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Frederiksberg, Denmark
                [3] 3Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX, United States
                [4] 4Division of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [5] 5Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Márta Gácsi, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Hungary

                Reviewed by: Péter Pongrácz, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary; Paolo Mongillo, University of Padua, Italy

                *Correspondence: Peter Sandøe, pes@ 123456sund.ku.dk

                †ORCID: Peter Sandøe, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-3273

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2023.1237547
                10625900
                37937153
                50d05c99-04ed-47e5-a6b1-1ca60a86a436
                Copyright © 2023 Sandøe, Palmer, Corr, Springer and Lund.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 June 2023
                : 11 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 8, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 9, Words: 8778
                Funding
                The study was supported via the Danish Centre for Companion Animal Welfare, of which PS is a leader. The Centre gets its core funding from the charitable foundation Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R. og Hustrus Fond. The funder had no influence on the design of the study and the interpretation of the presented results.
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences

                companion animals,attachment,dogs (canis familiaris),cats (felis catus),laps,pet health insurance,willingness to pay,representative questionnaire-based survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article