12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perception and use of flywheel resistance training amongst therapists in sport

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Flywheel (isoinertial) resistance training is a valid strength training method that has been incorporated in sport for decades, yet little is known about how therapists working in sport apply flywheel resistance training. We aimed to describe and understand current application and perception of flywheel resistance training amongst therapists working in sport. Seventy- three therapists (13 ± 10 years of experience) started part of this survey with 52 completing the entire electronic questionnaire. Nine multiple choice questions on application and perceptions of flywheel training (prerequisites, use of technology, barriers, and upper- and lower-body exercises) preceded two 6-point Likert scale statements on strength and reduction of injury likelihood. Most therapists (47/73) either used or intended to use flywheel training with their athletes and stated familiarisation would be a priority prior to initiating training. Although more than half suggested they were confident flywheel training could enhance strength (27/52) and muscular prehabilitation outcomes (40/52), many remained unsure. Nonetheless, it appears that therapists would mostly include flywheel training within prehabilitation (40/52) or during the later stages of rehabilitation (37/52). To monitor progress, therapists slightly prefer power (30/52) over velocity outputs, while few would not use them at all. Although therapists would prescribe most exercises - the squat, rotational exercise, and unilateral leg curl would be the most selected. Meanwhile, therapists reported remain most unsure or would avoid prescribing the lateral squat and unilateral hip extension. The biggest perceived barriers to flywheel training are equipment cost/space, evidence, and scheduling. The investigation provides valuable insight into the application and perception of flywheel training amongst therapists working in sport.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework

          Throughout the sport-science and sports-medicine literature, the term “elite” subjects might be one of the most overused and ill-defined terms. Currently, there is no common perspective or terminology to characterize the caliber and training status of an individual or cohort. This paper presents a 6-tiered Participant Classification Framework whereby all individuals across a spectrum of exercise backgrounds and athletic abilities can be classified. The Participant Classification Framework uses training volume and performance metrics to classify a participant to one of the following: Tier 0: Sedentary; Tier 1: Recreationally Active; Tier 2: Trained/Developmental; Tier 3: Highly Trained/National Level; Tier 4: Elite/International Level; or Tier 5: World Class. We suggest the Participant Classification Framework can be used to classify participants both prospectively (as part of study participant recruitment) and retrospectively (during systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses). Discussion around how the Participant Classification Framework can be tailored toward different sports, athletes, and/or events has occurred, and sport-specific examples provided. Additional nuances such as depth of sport participation, nationality differences, and gender parity within a sport are all discussed. Finally, chronological age with reference to the junior and masters athlete, as well as the Paralympic athlete, and their inclusion within the Participant Classification Framework has also been considered. It is our intention that this framework be widely implemented to systematically classify participants in research featuring exercise, sport, performance, health, and/or fitness outcomes going forward, providing the much-needed uniformity to classification practices.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Sports Act Living
                Front Sports Act Living
                Front. Sports Act. Living
                Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2624-9367
                12 April 2023
                2023
                : 5
                : 1141431
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]School of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Suffolk , Ipswich, United Kingdom
                [ 2 ]Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Suffolk , Ipswich, United Kingdom
                [ 3 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Isabel I , Burgos, Spain
                [ 4 ]Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres , Spain
                [ 5 ]Exercise Physiology Group, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria , Madrid, Spain
                [ 6 ]Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche , San Joan, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hamdi Chtourou, High institute of Sports and Physical Education, University of Sfax, Tunisia

                Reviewed by: Stephen McQuilliam, Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom Jordi Vicens Bordas, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Spain

                [* ] Correspondence: Marco Beato m.beato@ 123456uos.ac.uk

                Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

                Article
                10.3389/fspor.2023.1141431
                10130652
                37122637
                50b42b9d-3599-47be-a22b-a6548c615acc
                © 2023 de Keijzer, Raya-González, López Samanes, Moreno-Perez and Beato.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 January 2023
                : 22 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 47, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Funding
                This study received funding from Desmotec.SRL (Italy). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
                Categories
                Sports and Active Living
                Brief Research Report

                strength,survey,opinion,team sport,research
                strength, survey, opinion, team sport, research

                Comments

                Comment on this article