Research provides an international platform for academic exchange, collaboration and technological advancements. The journal publishes high-quality research from any research domain, from any author in the world. Published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in association with Science and Technology Review Publishing House, the publishing house under the leadership of China Association for Science and Technology (CAST)
Launched in 2018, Research is the first journal in the Science Partner Journal (SPJ) program. Research is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in association with Science and Technology Review Publishing House, the publishing house under the leadership of China Association for Science and Technology (CAST). As with all participants in the Science Partner Journal (SPJ) program, Research is editorially independent from the Science family of journals and CAST is responsible for all content published in the journal. To learn more about the Science Partner Journal program, visit the SPJ program homepage.
Should researchers be interested in submitting their work to Research, we ask that they please review the Information for Authors page.
Research content is Open Access, published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) on a continuous basis. This means that content is freely available to all readers upon publication and content is published as soon as production is complete. Science and Technology Review Publishing House holds an exclusive license to the content, the author(s) hold copyright and retain the right to publish.
AAAS is a member of the following organizations: ALPSP, DOAJ, OASPA, ORCID, SSP, and STM.
Research provides an international platform for academic exchange, collaboration and technological advancements. The journal publishes high-quality research from any research domain, from any author in the world.
Scope: Research publishes fundamental research in the life and physical sciences as well as important findings or issues in engineering and applied science. The journal publishes original research articles, reviews, perspectives, and editorials.
Topics of particular interest include, but are not limited to:
If you are an author seeking information regarding editorial policies or if you have questions about submitting a manuscript, please first review the journal's Publication Ethics and the Information for Authors page.
Science and Technology Review Publishing House
No. 86 Xueyuan South Rd
Haidian District, Beijing 100081
P. R. China
www.editorialmanager.com/research
Facebook: @SPJournals; @Research_Jrnl
Twitter: @SPJournals; @Research_Jrnl
YouTube: Research Journal
Research’s editorial board is comprised of active researchers and experts selected from a pool of scholars who have made significant and well recognized contributions to the field. The overall duties of our editors include, but are not limited to, overseeing the review process and soliciting submissions of high-quality manuscripts.
Members of the Editorial Board have a term of three years, which can be renewed. The founding Editorial Board (February 2018-February 2021) consisted of 102 internationally renowned scholars. The founding Editor-in-Chief (China) was Huang Wei, Professor of Northwestern Polytechnical University and academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The founding, and current, Editor-in-Chief (International) is Tianhong Cui, McKent Distinguished Professor at the University of Minnesota.
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editor
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editor
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editors
Associate Editors
Advisory Editor
Deputy Editor
Advisory Editors
Deputy Editor
The scientific editors of each Science Partner Journal (SPJ) evaluate each submission and those manuscripts that warrant further consideration for publication are sent out for in-depth peer review by external reviewers.
All Science Partner Journals operate under a single-blind peer review process. This means that editors and reviewers know the identity of the authors, however, the authors do not know the identity of the editors or reviewers. The reviewers’ identifies are also kept anonymous from each other.
When a manuscript is submitted to a Science Partner Journal, it first goes through a technical check by the editorial office. This ensures all necessary items are included in the submission prior to sending to a scientific editor for evaluation. If the scientific editor deems the manuscript worthy of full peer review, the scientific editor will then send the manuscript out for in-depth peer review by external reviewers.
A decision can be made at any point in the evaluation process to reject the manuscript, whether this be without review, or with one review. The final decision on every manuscript is made by a scientific editor.
The submitted manuscript is a privileged communication and must be treated as a confidential document. Reviewers should destroy all copies of the manuscript after review and not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor. Reviewers should not make personal or professional use of the data or interpretations before publication without the authors’ specific permission (unless they are invited to write an editorial or commentary to accompany the article).
Reviewers may not use AI technology in generating or writing their reviews because this could breach the confidentiality of the manuscript.
If a reviewer cannot judge a paper impartially, they should not accept the invitation to review it. If a reviewer has any professional, personal, or financial affiliations that are or even may be perceived as a conflict of interest in reviewing the manuscript, they should not accept the invitation for review, or, if this conflict of interest is uncovered after seeing the full manuscript materials, they should recuse themselves immediately and fully inform the journal editors. If there is an aspect of a manuscript that a reviewer does not feel they are qualified to evaluate, they should inform the editor.
If the manuscript’s author is an editor, it will be assigned to another, independent editor for evaluation. It must also meet the same criteria for evaluation as all other manuscripts.
Manuscripts submitted as part of a special issue may be assigned to a guest scientific editor instead of a member of the editorial board to manage the peer review process. A guest editor is an expert in a sub-topic who is invited by an Editor-in-Chief, in consultation with the editorial board, to provide specialized leadership for a particular special issue. Articles published in a special issue must adhere to the same evaluation criteria and publication ethics as a regular article published in the journal. The peer review process for a special issue manuscript also follows the same peer review process as a regular manuscript submitted to the journal. For example, when a special issue manuscript is submitted, it first goes through a technical check by the editorial office before it is assigned to an editor or guest editor to evaluate it and select external peer reviewers. If the manuscript’s author is an editor or guest editor, it will be assigned to another, independent editor or guest editor and it must meet the same criteria for evaluation as all other manuscripts.
The Science Partner Journal (SPJ) Program advocates and adheres to the highest standards for accurate and ethical publication of science.
To be included as an "author," a researcher must meet the criteria for authorship laid out in the definition of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which states that authorship should be based on whether an individual:
The Science Partner Journals do not permit ghost, guest, or honorary authorship. "Ghost authorship" refers to any context where an individual has made author-level contributions to the paper but is not included in the author list. "Guest or honorary authorship" refers to any context when someone who has not met all criteria of authorship is listed as an author. Individuals who have participated in generation of the research paper but who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgments section of a paper alongside a brief indication of the nature of their contribution.
All authors will also receive an email from the submission system asking them to confirm receipt and verify authorship of each paper that is submitted. Submission of a paper that has not first been approved by all authors listed will result in immediate rejection without appeal. Any changes in authorship following submission must be approved in writing by all of the original authors. The Authorship Change Form may be used in these cases.
The Science Partner Journals have a primary responsibility to its readers and to the public to provide in its pages clear and unbiased scientific results and analyses. We think that our readers should be informed of additional relationships of our authors that could pose a conflict of interest. Thus, for readers to evaluate the data and opinions presented in any Science Partner Journal, they must be informed of financial and other interests of our authors that may be at odds with unbiased presentation of data or analysis.
Therefore, the Science Partner Journals believe that manuscripts should be accompanied by clear disclosures from all authors of their affiliations, funding sources, or financial holdings that might raise questions about possible sources of bias.
Prior to publication each author listed on the manuscript must complete a copy of the Authorship and Conflict of Interest Form (located in the Information for Authors). This form asks authors to specify the nature and level of their contribution to the article, their understanding regarding the obligation to share data and materials, and any affiliations, funding sources or financial holdings that might raise questions about possible sources of bias.
AI-assisted technologies [such as large language models (LLMs), chatbots, and image creators] do not meet Research's criteria for authorship and therefore may not be listed as authors or coauthors, nor may sources cited in Research journal content be authored or coauthored by AI tools. Authors who use AI-assisted technologies as components of their research study or as aids in the writing or presentation of the manuscript should note this in the cover letter and in the acknowledgments section of the manuscript. Detailed information should be provided in the methods section: The full prompt used in the production of the work, as well as the AI tool and its version, should be disclosed. Authors are accountable for the accuracy of the work and for ensuring that there is no plagiarism. They must also ensure that all sources are appropriately cited and should carefully review the work to guard against bias that may be introduced by AI. Editors may decline to move forward with manuscripts if AI is used inappropriately. Reviewers may not use AI technology in generating or writing their reviews because this could breach the confidentiality of the manuscript.
AI-generated images and other multimedia are not permitted without explicit permission from the editors. Exceptions may be granted in certain situations—e.g., for images and/or videos in manuscripts specifically about AI and/or machine learning. Such exceptions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and should be disclosed at the time of submission. Research recognizes that this area is rapidly developing, and the position on AI-generated multimedia may change with the evolution of copyright law and industry standards on ethical use.
All Science Partner Journals utilize iThenticate, a plagiarism detection tool that compares all submissions against millions of published articles and web pages. Authors should appropriately cite all quotations and not heavily lean upon large swaths of content from other publications, including your own publications. If there is significant overlap with existing sources (not including the submission 's preprint posting), the editorial office will evaluate the overlap and contact the authors for clarification or editing if needed. Authors must comply with any requests from the editorial office regarding the iThenticate report to proceed with the review process. Significant, verbatim overlap with published sources indicating clear plagiarism will result in immediate rejection.
Papers may occasionally include images or figures created by a third-party (i.e., a non-author). Express permission must be received from the copyright holder prior to publication. The copyright holder, who could be a publisher, corporation, or individual, must complete the Image Permission form. Permission is only needed if the copyright holder is not an author on the paper. The form can be found in the Information for Authors.
Science Partner Journals will not consider any paper or component of a paper that has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere in any language. Distribution on the internet and conference proceedings may be considered prior publication and may compromise the originality of the paper, although we will accept submissions of papers first made available on not-for-profit preprint servers, such as ArXiv, AgriRxiv, and bioRxiv. Please contact the editorial office with questions regarding this policy or allowable postings. In addition, copies of papers submitted to other journals by any of the authors that relate to a research article submitted to any Science Partner Journal must be included with the submission.
After publication, all data and materials (including computer codes) necessary to understand, assess and extend the conclusions of the manuscript must be available to any reader of the Science Partner Journals. All reasonable requests for data or materials must be fulfilled. Unreasonable restrictions on data or material availability may prevent publication.
Before publication, large data sets must be deposited in a community approved database and an accession number or a specific access address must be included in the published paper. The DataCite Repository Finder can help authors find an appropriate repository for their data.
Fossils or other rare specimens must be deposited in a public museum or repository and available for research.
Any restrictions on the availability of data, codes, or materials, including fees and restrictions on original data obtained from other sources must be disclosed to the editors as must any Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs) that place constraints on providing the data or materials used or produced in this research. Please disclose this information when completing the Authorship and Conflict of Interest Form. Material Transfer Agreements must be included in the acknowledgements. Patents (whether applications or awards to the authors or home institutions) related to the work should also be declared at submission.
Citations to unpublished data and personal communications cannot be used to support claims in the paper. In press citations are allowed.
In research articles, the Materials and Methods section should provide sufficient detail to allow replication of the study.
We also encourage authors to consider submitting their step-by-step protocols to online protocol repositories such as Bio-protocol and Protocols.io and to cite them in their submissions.
For all animal experimentation described in the manuscript, all Science Partner Journals require that authors state in the Methods section their adherence to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or the equivalent. Species, strain, sex, and age of laboratory animals should be provided in the main text or Supplementary Materials.
For genetically modified animals and to avoid confounding effects of inbred strain background, littermate controls should generally be used, although exceptions may be allowed. Justification for other control animals should be included. Authors should fully describe the source of their animals and number of times backcrosses were performed.
Informed consent must be obtained for studies on humans after the nature and possible consequences of the studies are explained. A statement that informed consent was obtained must also appear in the manuscript. All research on humans must have approval from the institutional IRB (Institutional Review Board) or an equivalent body. The editors reserve the right to request IRB documents associated with a particular paper. Gender and age of all subjects should be provided in the main text or Supplementary Materials.
Authors are encouraged to follow published standard reporting guidelines for their study discipline. Many guidelines can be found at the EQUATOR website.
Accepted papers will be published online in an unformatted version as an Article in Press while the paper undergoes production. This accepted version is fully citable as an in press article.
If research is under an embargo that would be violated by such publication practices, please notify the editorial office upon acceptance.
All Science Partner Journals are archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. All Science Partner journals operate a fully Open Access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content.
For authors funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or other funding agencies that require their research results to be made publicly available in a designated repository such as PubMed Central (PMC), authors may deposit the final published version of the work themselves to PMC/UKPMC for immediate release (see https://publicaccess.nih.gov/Methods-C-D-BP). Note that some Science Partner Journals automatically deposit the final published version of the work to PMC upon publication. Please see the journal's Abstracting and Indexing page for a current list of repositories where all journal articles will be deposited automatically.
Authors and reviewers are expected to notify editors if a manuscript could be considered to report dual use research of concern (DURC). The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity has defined DURC as "life sciences research that, based on current understanding, can be reasonably anticipated to provide knowledge, information, products, or technologies that could be directly misapplied to pose a significant threat with broad potential consequences to public health and safety, agricultural crops and other plants, animals, the environment, materiel, or national security". Papers identified as possible DURC will be brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief for further evaluation. If necessary, outside reviewers with expertise in the area will be consulted.
AAAS and all of its journals follow all COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and we require all of our partnering institutions to do the same. All Science Partner Journals are committed to following these guidelines regarding ethical concerns including issues related to:
Any ethical concerns should be directed to the specific Science Partner Journal's editorial office.
All Science Partner Journals are committed to addressing and correcting errors in published papers through the following.
Errata, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions are completed at the discretion of the editors. They are published online and linked to the related published article.
Authors or readers that discover an error in a published paper should contact the specific Science Partner Journal's editorial office.
For more infomration, please visit the journal page for author submission details here.
To check on the status of your submission, please visit Research's manuscript submissions site.
For general guidance on using the manuscript submission system, please read the tutorials for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers. For questions on specific functionality, explore the Editorial Manager video library.
The journal Research accepts submissions for original research articles, reviews, perspectives, and editorials. Prior to submission, each author should review and be prepared to fulfill the submission requirements outlined in the Publication Ethics page and comply with following limitations.
Research Articles should present a major advance and must include an abstract of up to 250 words, an introduction and sections with brief and informative subheadings. Authors may include up to six figures and/or tables and about 40 references. Total research article length should be under 10,000 words. Supplementary materials should be limited to information that is not essential for the general understanding of the research presented in the main text and can include data sets, figures, tables, videos or audio files. For ease in preparing your submission, please follow the manuscript templates in Word and LaTex. Instructions for preparing figures are provided in our one-page figure guide.
Review Articles should describe and synthesize recent developments of significance and highlight future directions. Reviews must include an abstract, an introduction that outlines the main theme, brief subheadings and an outline of important unresolved questions. Reviews should be no longer than 8,000 words, although longer manuscripts will be considered. Authors may include up to six figures and/or tables and up to 100 references. Most reviews are solicited by the editors, but unsolicited submissions will be considered.
Perspectives highlight recent exciting research, but do not primarily discuss the author’s own work. They may provide context for the findings within a field or explain potential interdisciplinary importance. Perspectives that comment on papers in Research should add a dimension to the research and not merely be a summary of the experiments described in the paper. As these are meant to express a personal viewpoint, with rare exceptions, Perspectives should have no more than five authors. Perspectives should include an abstract, have no more than 1,000 words, one figure or table, and no more than 20 references.
Commentaries are short observations or discussions about findings that concern a current issue in the field. Commentaries should have no more than three authors, include an abstract, and have no more than 1,000 words and one figure or table.
Rapid Reports present ground-breaking developments or discoveries in the field. Submissions must include a short abstract (maximum of 150 words), no more than 10 references, and two data elements (any combination of figures or tables). Rapid Reports should be divided into an introduction, a combined results and discussion section, and a materials and methods section. Total length should be less than 1,000 words excluding the abstract, materials and methods, and references. Junior scientists are encouraged to contribute their exciting validated short advances for consideration as a Rapid Report.
Editorials are short, invited opinion pieces that discuss an issue of immediate importance to the research community. Editorials should have fewer than 1,000 words total, no abstract, a minimal number of references (no more than five) and no figures or tables. Editorials are solicited by the editors.