14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What is the optimal anesthetic monitoring regarding immediate and short‐term outcomes after liver transplantation?—A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Liver transplant centers vary in approach to intraoperative vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and temperature management. Evidence is limited regarding impact of selected modalities on postoperative outcomes.

          Objectives

          To review the literature and provide expert panel recommendations on optimal intraoperative arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and intraoperative temperature management regarding immediate and short‐term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT).

          Methods

          Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Recommendations made for: (1) Vascular accesses, arterial BP and CVP monitoring, (2) cardiac function monitoring, and (3) Intraoperative temperature management (CRD42021239908).

          Results

          Of 2619 articles screened 16 were included. Studies were small, retrospective, and observational. Vascular access studies demonstrated low rates of insertion complications. TEE studies demonstrated low rates of esophageal hemorrhage. One study found lower hospital‐LOS and 30‐day mortality in patients monitored with both PAC and TEE. Other monitoring studies were heterogenous in design and outcomes. Temperature studies showed increased blood transfusion and ventilation times in hypothermic groups.

          Conclusions

          Recommendations were made for; routine arterial and CVP monitoring as a minimum standard of practice, consideration of discrepancy between peripheral and central arterial BP in patients with hemodynamic instability and high vasopressor requirements, and routine use of high flow cannulae while monitoring for extravasation and hematoma formation. Availability and expertise in PAC and/or TEE monitoring is strongly recommended particularly in hemodynamic instability, portopulmonary HT and/or cardiac dysfunction. TEE use is recommended as an acceptable risk in patients with treated esophageal varices and is an effective diagnostic tool for emergency cardiovascular collapse. Maintenance of intraoperative normothermia is strongly recommended.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.

          This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessments (HTAs), and clinical practice guidelines addressing alternative management options. The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes. After the evidence is collected and summarized, GRADE provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect. Recommendations are characterized as strong or weak (alternative terms conditional or discretionary) according to the quality of the supporting evidence and the balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of the alternative management options. GRADE suggests summarizing evidence in succinct, transparent, and informative summary of findings tables that show the quality of evidence and the magnitude of relative and absolute effects for each important outcome and/or as evidence profiles that provide, in addition, detailed information about the reason for the quality of evidence rating. Subsequent articles in this series will address GRADE's approach to formulating questions, assessing quality of evidence, and developing recommendations. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.

            This article describes the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to classifying the direction and strength of recommendations. The strength of a recommendation, separated into strong and weak, is defined as the extent to which one can be confident that the desirable effects of an intervention outweigh its undesirable effects. Alternative terms for a weak recommendation include conditional, discretionary, or qualified. The strength of a recommendation has specific implications for patients, the public, clinicians, and policy makers. Occasionally, guideline developers may choose to make "only-in-research" recommendations. Although panels may choose not to make recommendations, this choice leaves those looking for answers from guidelines without the guidance they are seeking. GRADE therefore encourages panels to, wherever possible, offer recommendations. Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength.

              In the GRADE approach, the strength of a recommendation reflects the extent to which we can be confident that the composite desirable effects of a management strategy outweigh the composite undesirable effects. This article addresses GRADE's approach to determining the direction and strength of a recommendation. The GRADE describes the balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest among alternative management strategies depending on four domains, namely estimates of effect for desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest, confidence in the estimates of effect, estimates of values and preferences, and resource use. Ultimately, guideline panels must use judgment in integrating these factors to make a strong or weak recommendation for or against an intervention. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tomf@adhb.govt.nz
                Journal
                Clin Transplant
                Clin Transplant
                10.1111/(ISSN)1399-0012
                CTR
                Clinical Transplantation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0902-0063
                1399-0012
                09 December 2022
                October 2022
                : 36
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1111/ctr.v36.10 )
                : e14643
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand
                [ 2 ] Department of Anesthesia University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
                [ 3 ] Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal Free Hospital London UK
                [ 4 ] Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 5 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland USA
                [ 6 ] Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Royal Free Hospital London UK
                [ 7 ] Division of Surgery & Interventional Science University College London London UK
                [ 8 ] Department of Anesthesiology Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
                [ 9 ] Department of Surgery Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Thomas M.A. Fernandez, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Level 8, Building A01 Support, Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, NI 1063 New Zealand.

                Email: tomf@ 123456adhb.govt.nz

                Article
                CTR14643
                10.1111/ctr.14643
                10077907
                35262975
                4eb95d2a-ed5b-4794-b680-deff0208e4ff
                © 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 14 January 2022
                : 28 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 14, Pages: 16, Words: 8793
                Funding
                Funded by: International Liver Transplant Society (ILTS)
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:06.04.2023

                Transplantation
                central venous access,cardiac output or hemodynamic monitoring,pulmonary artery catheter,transesophageal echocardiography,picco,hyperthermia,lidco,monitoring,or flotrac,hypothermia,thermoregulation,liver transplantation,venous or arterial access

                Comments

                Comment on this article