7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pro-environmental purchase intentions in a low-involvement context: the role of myopia and apathy

      , ,
      Journal of Global Responsibility
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To achieve the UN’s 2030 agenda, consumers will need to behave more responsibly and make less environmentally harmful purchases. This study aims to investigate the antecedents of consumers’ pro-environmental purchase intentions based on a range of motivating (i.e. attitudes, locus of control) and inhibiting factors (i.e. apathy and myopia) for a low-involvement product. It also tests the moderating effect of the greenness of a low-involvement product (green vs nongreen) on the consumer’s pro-environmental purchase intentions.

          Design/methodology/approach

          An online panel survey of 679 Turkish consumers was used. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships.

          Findings

          The results suggest that while inhibiting factors (i.e. apathy and myopia) may not directly impede such purchase intentions, they could prevent consumers from considering the environmental characteristics of low-involvement products.

          Practical implications

          The insights are expected to assist marketers and policymakers to understand consumer psychological mechanisms when encouraging and promoting pro-environmental behavior in the context of low-involvement purchases, enhancing consumers contributing to the 2030 objectives.

          Originality/value

          This study examines the role of inhibiting factors behind the purchase of low-involvement goods. It also tests the moderating effect of the greenness of a low-involvement product on pro-environmental purchase intentions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references139

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bad is stronger than good.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review

              The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has received considerable attention in the literature. The present study is a quantitative integration and review of that research. From a database of 185 independent studies published up to the end of 1997, the TPB accounted for 27% and 39% of the variance in behaviour and intention, respectively. The perceived behavioural control (PBC) construct accounted for significant amounts of variance in intention and behaviour, independent of theory of reasoned action variables. When behaviour measures were self-reports, the TPB accounted for 11% more of the variance in behaviour than when behaviour measures were objective or observed (R2s = .31 and .21, respectively). Attitude, subjective norm and PBC account for significantly more of the variance in individuals' desires than intentions or self-predictions, but intentions and self-predictions were better predictors of behaviour. The subjective norm construct is generally found to be a weak predictor of intentions. This is partly attributable to a combination of poor measurement and the need for expansion of the normative component. The discussion focuses on ways in which current TPB research can be taken forward in the light of the present review.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Global Responsibility
                JGR
                Emerald
                2041-2568
                2041-2568
                August 30 2022
                August 30 2022
                Article
                10.1108/JGR-04-2022-0034
                4ca4a6e4-bf92-4fdb-8b75-59e429422279
                © 2022

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article