11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recommendations for hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill children—expert consensus statement issued by the cardiovascular dynamics section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cardiovascular instability is common in critically ill children. There is a scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.

          Methods

          Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature—a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document.

          Results

          Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement,” 20 “weak agreement,” and 2 had “no agreement.” Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following the first round of voting. The agreed 72 recommendations were then coalesced into 36 detailing four key areas of hemodynamic monitoring in the main manuscript. Due to a lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus.

          Conclusions

          These expert consensus-based recommendations may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

          Users of clinical practice guidelines and other recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the recommendations. Systematic and explicit methods of making judgments can reduce errors and improve communication. We have developed a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts. In this article we present a summary of our approach from the perspective of a guideline user. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation require consideration of the balance between benefits and harms, the quality of the evidence, translation of the evidence into specific circumstances, and the certainty of the baseline risk. It is also important to consider costs (resource utilisation) before making a recommendation. Inconsistencies among systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations reduce their potential to facilitate critical appraisal and improve communication of these judgments. Our system for guiding these complex judgments balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

            It is unknown whether lactate monitoring aimed to decrease levels during initial treatment in critically ill patients improves outcome. To assess the effect of lactate monitoring and resuscitation directed at decreasing lactate levels in intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted with a lactate level of greater than or equal to 3.0 mEq/L. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the lactate group, treatment was guided by lactate levels with the objective to decrease lactate by 20% or more per 2 hours for the initial 8 hours of ICU stay. In the control group, the treatment team had no knowledge of lactate levels (except for the admission value) during this period. The primary outcome measure was hospital mortality. The lactate group received more fluids and vasodilators. However, there were no significant differences in lactate levels between the groups. In the intention-to-treat population (348 patients), hospital mortality in the control group was 43.5% (77/177) compared with 33.9% (58/171) in the lactate group (P = 0.067). When adjusted for predefined risk factors, hospital mortality was lower in the lactate group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.87; P = 0.006). In the lactate group, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were lower between 9 and 72 hours, inotropes could be stopped earlier, and patients could be weaned from mechanical ventilation and discharged from the ICU earlier. In patients with hyperlactatemia on ICU admission, lactate-guided therapy significantly reduced hospital mortality when adjusting for predefined risk factors. As this was consistent with important secondary endpoints, this study suggests that initial lactate monitoring has clinical benefit. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00270673).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines

              AGREE II is a widely used standard for assessing the methodological quality of practice guidelines. This article describes the development of the AGREE Reporting Checklist, which was designed to improve the quality of practice guideline reporting and aligns with AGREE II in its structure and content.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Yogen.Singh@nhs.net
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                22 October 2020
                22 October 2020
                2020
                : 24
                : 620
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5335.0, ISNI 0000000121885934, Department of Pediatrics - Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, , Cambridge University Hospitals and University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, ; Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.410526.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0277 7938, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, , Gregorio Marañón Hospital University Hospital, ; Madrid, Spain
                [3 ]GRID grid.488819.4, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado, , Section of Cardiac Intensive Care, The Heart Institute, ; Pittsburgh, USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.483570.d, ISNI 0000 0004 5345 7223, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, , Evelina London Children’s Hospital, ; London, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.414125.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0727 6809, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, , Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù-IRCC, ; Rome, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.420468.c, Department of Pediatric and Cardiac Intensive Care, , Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute for Child Health, ; London, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.420004.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 2244, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, , The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Newcastle, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.461578.9, Department of Neonatology, , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children’s Hospital, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [9 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, , Radboud University Medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5207-9019
                Article
                3326
                10.1186/s13054-020-03326-2
                7579971
                33092621
                4c71cf37-2cc8-4450-9dd9-d0b0b25af6fd
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 6 August 2020
                : 5 October 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                hemodynamic monitoring (hd),paediatric intensive care unit (picu),children,cardiovascular instability,recommendations

                Comments

                Comment on this article